• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基层医疗中乳腺癌风险评估与管理:医疗服务提供者的态度、实践及障碍

Breast cancer risk assessment and management in primary care: provider attitudes, practices, and barriers.

作者信息

Sabatino Susan A, McCarthy Ellen P, Phillips Russell S, Burns Risa B

机构信息

Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway (MS) K-53, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Detect Prev. 2007;31(5):375-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cdp.2007.08.003. Epub 2007 Nov 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.cdp.2007.08.003
PMID:18037249
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We surveyed primary care providers to evaluate breast cancer risk assessment and management practices.

METHODS

Primary care providers included staff (attendees, fellows, nurse practitioners) and residents practicing >or=1 session/week in an outpatient general medicine practice or community practices. Of 201 eligible providers, 107 (53%) completed a self-administered questionnaire ascertaining attitudes, perceived barriers, and clinical practices related to assessing and managing breast cancer risk.

RESULTS

Of providers, 96% mostly or definitely agreed that assessing breast cancer risk was a primary care provider's responsibility. In assessing risk, most providers reported usually or always asking about family history (71%), but fewer usually or always ask about parity (48%), biopsies (40%), or menarche (35%), and most never calculate Gail scores (76%). In managing women at high risk for breast cancer, many providers reported usually or always communicating increased risk to patients (58%) and tailoring screening based on risk (53%); however fewer providers usually or always discuss chemoprevention (13%) or genetic testing (16%) or refer to specialists (35%). Addressing more immediate issues (25%) and lacking confidence in knowledge of risk and risk assessment (20%) were the most commonly reported barriers to assessing risk (n=83).

CONCLUSION

Primary care providers generally assess breast cancer risk primarily using family history, potentially missing women at increased risk based on other criteria. In addition, although providers tailor screening and refer women at high risk to specialists, they infrequently discuss chemoprevention or genetic testing. Addressing perceived barriers to assessing risk may improve care.

摘要

背景

我们对基层医疗服务提供者进行了调查,以评估乳腺癌风险评估与管理实践。

方法

基层医疗服务提供者包括员工(参会者、研究员、执业护士)以及在门诊普通内科或社区诊所每周执业≥1次的住院医师。在201名符合条件的提供者中,107名(53%)完成了一份自我管理的问卷,该问卷用于确定与评估和管理乳腺癌风险相关的态度、感知到的障碍及临床实践。

结果

96%的提供者大多或肯定同意评估乳腺癌风险是基层医疗服务提供者的职责。在评估风险时,大多数提供者报告通常或总是询问家族史(71%),但较少有人通常或总是询问生育情况(48%)、活检情况(40%)或初潮情况(35%),且大多数人从不计算盖尔评分(76%)。在管理乳腺癌高风险女性时,许多提供者报告通常或总是向患者传达增加的风险(58%)并根据风险调整筛查(53%);然而,较少有提供者通常或总是讨论化学预防(13%)或基因检测(16%)或转诊至专科医生(35%)。处理更紧迫的问题(25%)以及对风险和风险评估知识缺乏信心(20%)是评估风险时最常报告的障碍(n = 83)。

结论

基层医疗服务提供者通常主要利用家族史评估乳腺癌风险,可能会遗漏基于其他标准风险增加的女性。此外,尽管提供者会根据风险调整筛查并将高风险女性转诊至专科医生,但他们很少讨论化学预防或基因检测。解决评估风险时感知到的障碍可能会改善医疗服务。

相似文献

1
Breast cancer risk assessment and management in primary care: provider attitudes, practices, and barriers.基层医疗中乳腺癌风险评估与管理:医疗服务提供者的态度、实践及障碍
Cancer Detect Prev. 2007;31(5):375-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cdp.2007.08.003. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
2
Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.儿科初级保健提供者对幼儿进行牙科筛查和转诊。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e642-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1269.
3
Attitudes of Colorado health professionals toward breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women.科罗拉多州医疗专业人员对西班牙裔女性乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查的态度。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1995(18):95-100.
4
Implementation of lipid screening guidelines in children by primary pediatric providers.儿科初级保健提供者在儿童中实施血脂筛查指南。
J Pediatr. 2014 Mar;164(3):572-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.10.027. Epub 2013 Nov 16.
5
Cervical cancer screening and management practices among providers in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP).国家乳腺癌和宫颈癌早期检测项目(NBCCEDP)中医疗服务提供者的宫颈癌筛查与管理实践。
Cancer. 2007 Sep 1;110(5):1024-32. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22875.
6
Use of the Gail model and breast cancer preventive therapy among three primary care specialties.盖尔模型在三个初级保健专科中的应用及乳腺癌预防性治疗
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014 Sep;23(9):746-52. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2014.4742. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
7
Screening for colorectal cancer on the front line.一线结直肠癌筛查
Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Apr;98(4):915-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07360.x.
8
Obesity management in gynecologic cancer survivors: provider practices and attitudes.妇科癌症幸存者的肥胖管理:提供者的实践和态度。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 May;208(5):408.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.02.002. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
9
Needs assessment and current practice of alcohol risk assessment of pregnant women and women of childbearing age by primary health care professionals.初级卫生保健专业人员对孕妇和育龄妇女进行酒精风险评估的需求评估及当前实践。
Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 Summer;15(2):e214-22. Epub 2008 Jun 1.
10
Breast and colorectal cancer screening: U.S. primary care physicians' reports of barriers.乳腺癌和结直肠癌筛查:美国初级保健医生报告的障碍。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Dec;43(6):584-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.08.016.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation study of risk-reduction activities after personalized breast cancer education tool in the WISDOM study.WISDOM研究中个性化乳腺癌教育工具后风险降低活动的验证研究。
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2024 Oct 14;10(1):90. doi: 10.1038/s41523-024-00681-z.
2
Impact of Affordable Care Act Provisions on the Racial Makeup of Patients Enrolled at a Deep South, High-Risk Breast Cancer Clinic.《平价医疗法案》条款对美国最南部一家高风险乳腺癌诊所登记患者种族构成的影响
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Sep 5. doi: 10.1007/s40615-024-02104-y.
3
A Scoping Review of Personalized, Interactive, Web-Based Clinical Decision Tools Available for Breast Cancer Prevention and Screening in the United States.
美国可用于乳腺癌预防和筛查的个性化、交互式、基于网络的临床决策工具的范围综述
MDM Policy Pract. 2024 Mar 17;9(1):23814683241236511. doi: 10.1177/23814683241236511. eCollection 2024 Jan-Jun.
4
Validation Study on Risk-Reduction Activities after Exposure to a Personalized Breast Cancer Risk-Assessment Education Tool in High-Risk Women in the WISDOM Study.WISDOM研究中高危女性接触个性化乳腺癌风险评估教育工具后风险降低活动的验证研究
Res Sq. 2023 May 10:rs.3.rs-2787493. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2787493/v1.
5
Proactive breast cancer risk assessment in primary care: a review based on the principles of screening.初级保健中的主动乳腺癌风险评估:基于筛查原则的综述。
Br J Cancer. 2023 May;128(9):1636-1646. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02145-w. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
6
Determinants of guideline-concordant breast cancer screening by family physicians for women aged 40-49 years: a qualitative analysis.影响家庭医生为 40-49 岁女性进行符合指南的乳腺癌筛查的因素:一项定性分析。
CMAJ Open. 2022 Oct 18;10(4):E900-E910. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210266. Print 2022 Sep-Oct.
7
Primary care physician referral practices regarding BRCA1/2 genetic counseling in a major health system.主要医疗保健系统中初级保健医生对 BRCA1/2 基因咨询的转诊实践。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Sep;195(2):153-160. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06523-5. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
8
Physicians' strategies for using family history data: having the data is not the same as using the data.医生使用家族病史数据的策略:拥有数据并不等同于使用数据。
JAMIA Open. 2020 Oct 8;3(3):378-385. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaa035. eCollection 2020 Oct.
9
OB/GYN residents' training, attitudes, and comfort level regarding genetics.妇产科住院医师的培训、态度和对遗传学的舒适程度。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Nov;38(11):2871-2880. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02310-1. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
10
Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Primary Prevention Advice in Primary Care: A Systematic Review of Provider Attitudes and Routine Behaviours.基层医疗中乳腺癌风险评估与一级预防建议:对医疗服务提供者态度和常规行为的系统评价
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Aug 18;13(16):4150. doi: 10.3390/cancers13164150.