Boone D
Trenton Psychiatric Hospital, NJ 08628.
Percept Mot Skills. 1991 Aug;73(1):315-22. doi: 10.2466/pms.1991.73.1.315.
Use of the Modified WAIS-R described by Cella in 1984 with psychiatric inpatients was criticized on several grounds. First, the modification did not accurately identify areas of relative cognitive strength and weakness. An accuracy rate of 49% was considered unacceptable for interpretation of individual profiles, the task the WAIS-RM was originally designed to perform. Second, use of the WAIS-RM does not significantly reduce total administration time. For the majority of 70 psychiatric inpatients, at least 80% of the WAIS-R items would be administered, resulting in saving just fifteen minutes. Finally, an inpatient's confidence and motivation to perform well could be compromised by skipping earlier, easier items. Administration of the full WAIS-R battery is recommended if a discussion of relative strengths and weaknesses is desired.
1984年,塞拉描述的修订版韦氏成人智力量表(WAIS-R)在精神病住院患者中的使用受到了多方面的批评。首先,这种修订未能准确识别相对认知优势和劣势的领域。对于个体剖面图的解读而言,49%的准确率被认为是不可接受的,而解读个体剖面图正是WAIS-RM最初设计要完成的任务。其次,使用WAIS-RM并不能显著减少总施测时间。对于70名精神病住院患者中的大多数而言,至少80%的WAIS-R项目仍需施测,结果仅节省了15分钟。最后,跳过较早、较容易的项目可能会损害住院患者良好表现的信心和动力。如果希望讨论相对优势和劣势,建议施测完整的WAIS-R量表。