Boone D
Drake Complex, Trenton Psychiatric Hospital, West Trenton, NJ 08628.
J Pers Assess. 1994 Apr;62(2):346-51. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6202_14.
Internal consistency reliability estimates were determined for the Wiener and Harmon (1948) Subtle and Obvious scales of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) with a group of psychiatric inpatients. Except for Subtle Scale 3 (Hy), Subtle scale reliabilities were unacceptably low, ranging from .32 to .59. In each case, inclusion of the Subtle items attenuated the reliability of the corresponding Full clinical scale. Removing the Subtle items resulted in comparable reliabilities across all Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) scales, ranging from .75 to .92. It was hypothesized that the poor reliability of the Subtle scales may attenuate the validity of the Full clinical scales.
针对一组精神科住院患者,确定了明尼苏达多相人格问卷第二版(MMPI - 2)的维纳和哈蒙(1948)的细微和明显量表的内部一致性信度估计值。除了细微量表3(Hy)外,细微量表的信度低得令人无法接受,范围从0.32到0.59。在每种情况下,纳入细微项目都会削弱相应全临床量表的信度。去除细微项目后,所有明尼苏达多相人格问卷第二版(MMPI - 2)量表的信度相当,范围从0.75到0.92。据推测,细微量表信度不佳可能会削弱全临床量表的效度。