Fortu Jesusa Milalaine T, Kim In K, Cooper Amy, Condra Cole, Lorenz Douglas J, Pierce Mary Clyde
Department of Emergency Medicine, Joe DiMaggio Children's Hospital, Hollywood, FL 33021, USA.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2009 Jun;25(6):387-92. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181a79305.
We sought to determine the use and results of urine toxicology screens (UTS) in psychiatric patients undergoing a UTS test for medical clearance in a pediatric emergency department.
A structured retrospective study was conducted over a 6-month period. All emergency department (ED) charts were reviewed of patients 8 to 17 years who had a UTS. Urine toxicology screens were identified as medically indicated or routine-driven. Medically indicated UTS were patients who presented with seizures, syncope, headache, altered mental status, ingestion, chest pain/palpitation, shortness of breath, sexual assault, or those who were brought in for motor vehicle accident (MVA). Routine-driven UTS were uncomplicated psychiatric patients who presented with aggressive or out of control behavior, intentional self-inflicted wounds, or symptoms of depression, all of whom presented without any evidence of drug or alcohol ingestion or altered mental status. Routine-driven UTS were quantified for positive tests. In addition, we determined the change in management and disposition of those patients. We also determined the concordance of provided drug use history with UTS result.
Of the 652 charts reviewed, 267 UTS were medically indicated; 385 were routine-driven. Of the routine-driven UTS group, 254/267 (95%) patients with negative screens and 115/118 (97%) with positive screens were referred for psychiatric treatment after psychiatric evaluation. Fisher exact test of the comparison of the disposition after psychiatric assessment with the UTS result was nonsignificant. The UTS result also had no effect on the type of psychiatric disposition (ie, outpatient therapy, partial hospitalization, inpatient hospitalization). Concordance with provided history of illicit drug use was significant.
Routine-driven UTS in uncomplicated pediatric psychiatric patients being evaluated in the ED offered little additional information, did not influence management, and potentially increased both ED cost and time. Patients with straightforward psychiatric complaints may be medically cleared without a UTS.
我们试图确定在儿科急诊科接受尿液毒理学筛查(UTS)以获得医疗许可的精神科患者中UTS的使用情况及结果。
进行了一项为期6个月的结构化回顾性研究。对所有8至17岁接受UTS检查的急诊科(ED)患者病历进行了审查。尿液毒理学筛查被确定为有医学指征或常规驱动。有医学指征的UTS患者表现为癫痫发作、晕厥、头痛、精神状态改变、摄入、胸痛/心悸、呼吸急促、性侵犯,或因机动车事故(MVA)而被送来的患者。常规驱动的UTS是指那些没有药物或酒精摄入或精神状态改变证据的、表现为攻击性行为或行为失控、故意自伤或抑郁症状的无并发症精神科患者。对常规驱动的UTS进行阳性检测量化。此外,我们确定了这些患者的管理和处置变化。我们还确定了所提供的药物使用史与UTS结果的一致性。
在审查的652份病历中,267份UTS有医学指征;385份是常规驱动。在常规驱动的UTS组中,254/267(95%)筛查结果为阴性的患者和115/118(97%)筛查结果为阳性的患者在精神科评估后被转介接受精神科治疗。对精神科评估后的处置与UTS结果进行比较的Fisher精确检验无统计学意义。UTS结果对精神科处置类型(即门诊治疗、部分住院、住院治疗)也没有影响。与所提供的非法药物使用史的一致性显著。
在急诊科接受评估的无并发症儿科精神科患者中,常规驱动的UTS几乎没有提供额外信息,不影响管理,并且可能增加急诊科的成本和时间。有简单精神科主诉的患者可能无需进行UTS即可获得医疗许可。