• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

妇科手术后患者自控硬膜外镇痛的吗啡浓度比较。

A comparison of morphine concentrations for patient-controlled epidural analgesia following gynecological surgery.

作者信息

Inoue S, Kawakami T, Seo N

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Jichi Medical University, School of Medicine, Tochigi, 19644434, Japan.

出版信息

Minerva Anestesiol. 2009 Sep;75(9):498-503. Epub 2009 May 21.

PMID:19461562
Abstract

AIM

To compare the analgesic efficacy of a lower (12.5 mg/mL) vs. higher (25 mg/mL) concentration of morphine with 0.2% ropivacaine for patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) following gynecological surgery.

METHODS

In a randomized double-blinded study, 40 ASA physical status I and II gynecological patients who were receiving combined general and epidural anesthesia for surgery and epidural analgesia for postoperative analgesia were assigned to receive 12.5 mg/mL (N=20) or 25 mg/mL (N=20) morphine with 0.2% ropivacaine for PCEA (continuous infusion 4 mL/h, bolus injection 2 ml, lockout interval 15 min). Maximum visual analogue pain scores (VAPS) at rest (VAPS-R max) and movement (VAPS-M max) during the previous 24 hours were assessed at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively, and the cumulative number of self-administrations in PCEA during the postoperative 48 h were also measured.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in VAPS at rest or with movement, and there were no differences in the cumulative boluses of PCEA between the groups. The incidences of nausea, vomiting, pruritus and leg numbness were greater in the 25 mg/mL morphine group, although statistically insignificant.

CONCLUSIONS

PCEA using 0.2% ropivacaine and 12.5 mg/mL morphine compared with 0.2% ropivacaine and 25 mg/mL morphine provides equianalgesia with no differences in bolus administration. With respect to the analgesic efficacy and the potential risk for side effects, PCEA using 0.2% ropivacaine and 12.5 mg/ml morphine is a better choice for postoperative gynecological patients.

摘要

目的

比较较低浓度(12.5毫克/毫升)与较高浓度(25毫克/毫升)的吗啡联合0.2%罗哌卡因用于妇科手术后患者自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)的镇痛效果。

方法

在一项随机双盲研究中,40例接受全身麻醉与硬膜外麻醉联合手术且术后采用硬膜外镇痛的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况I级和II级的妇科患者被随机分为两组,每组20例,分别接受含12.5毫克/毫升(N = 20)或25毫克/毫升(N = 20)吗啡的0.2%罗哌卡因用于PCEA(持续输注4毫升/小时,单次注射2毫升,锁定时间间隔15分钟)。在术后24小时和48小时评估前24小时静息时的最大视觉模拟疼痛评分(VAPS-R max)和活动时的最大视觉模拟疼痛评分(VAPS-M max),并测量术后48小时内PCEA的累计自控给药次数。

结果

静息或活动时的VAPS无显著差异,两组间PCEA的累计单次给药量也无差异。25毫克/毫升吗啡组恶心、呕吐、瘙痒和腿部麻木的发生率更高,尽管无统计学意义。

结论

与0.2%罗哌卡因联合25毫克/毫升吗啡相比,0.2%罗哌卡因联合12.5毫克/毫升吗啡用于PCEA时镇痛效果相当,单次给药量无差异。就镇痛效果和潜在副作用风险而言,0.2%罗哌卡因联合12.5毫克/毫升吗啡用于PCEA对妇科术后患者是更好的选择。

相似文献

1
A comparison of morphine concentrations for patient-controlled epidural analgesia following gynecological surgery.妇科手术后患者自控硬膜外镇痛的吗啡浓度比较。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2009 Sep;75(9):498-503. Epub 2009 May 21.
2
Addition of 0.1% bupivacaine to buprenorphine and droperidol in patient-controlled epidural analgesia improved postoperative pain scores on coughing after gynecological surgery.在患者自控硬膜外镇痛中,将0.1%布比卡因添加到丁丙诺啡和氟哌利多中,可改善妇科手术后咳嗽时的术后疼痛评分。
J Clin Anesth. 2005 May;17(3):167-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2004.06.015.
3
Efficacy of intrathecal morphine with epidural ropivacaine infusion for postcesarean analgesia.鞘内注射吗啡联合硬膜外罗哌卡因输注用于剖宫产术后镇痛的效果。
J Clin Anesth. 2010 Jun;22(4):268-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2009.09.003.
4
Postoperative extradural analgesia with morphine and ropivacaine. A double-blind comparison between placebo and ropivacaine 10 mg/h or 16 mg/h.吗啡与罗哌卡因用于术后硬膜外镇痛。安慰剂与10毫克/小时或16毫克/小时罗哌卡因的双盲对照研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005 Sep;49(8):1191-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00715.x.
5
Comparison of 2 concentrations of levobupivacaine in postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia.术后患者自控硬膜外镇痛中两种浓度左旋布比卡因的比较。
J Clin Anesth. 2005 Nov;17(7):531-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2005.01.007.
6
Superiority of postoperative epidural over intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in orthopedic oncologic patients.骨科肿瘤患者术后硬膜外镇痛优于静脉自控镇痛。
Surgery. 2005 Nov;138(5):869-76. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.004.
7
The efficacy of intravenous patient-controlled remifentanil versus morphine anesthesia after coronary artery surgery.冠状动脉搭桥术后静脉自控瑞芬太尼与吗啡麻醉的疗效比较
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009 Apr;23(2):170-4. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2008.07.006. Epub 2008 Sep 24.
8
A prospective randomized trial comparing patient-controlled epidural analgesia to patient-controlled intravenous analgesia on postoperative pain control and recovery after major open gynecologic cancer surgery.一项前瞻性随机试验,比较患者自控硬膜外镇痛与患者自控静脉镇痛对大型开放性妇科癌症手术后疼痛控制和恢复的影响。
Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Jul;114(1):111-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.03.014. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
9
Low vs. high concentration of levobupivacaine for post-operative epidural analgesia: influence of mode of delivery.低浓度与高浓度左旋布比卡因用于术后硬膜外镇痛:给药方式的影响
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006 May;50(5):613-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.001004.x.
10
Postoperative analgesia after major spine surgery: patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia.脊柱大手术后的术后镇痛:患者自控硬膜外镇痛与患者自控静脉镇痛的比较。
Anesth Analg. 2006 Nov;103(5):1311-7. doi: 10.1213/01.ane/0000247966.49492.72.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Parecoxib as an Adjunct to Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia after Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.帕瑞昔布作为腹部子宫切除术后患者自控硬膜外镇痛辅助用药的效果:一项多中心、随机、安慰剂对照试验
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 13;11(9):e0162589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162589. eCollection 2016.
2
Postoperative analgesia.术后镇痛
J Anesth. 2010 Apr;24(2):333-6. doi: 10.1007/s00540-010-0920-7. Epub 2010 Mar 18.