Suppr超能文献

一项前瞻性随机试验,比较患者自控硬膜外镇痛与患者自控静脉镇痛对大型开放性妇科癌症手术后疼痛控制和恢复的影响。

A prospective randomized trial comparing patient-controlled epidural analgesia to patient-controlled intravenous analgesia on postoperative pain control and recovery after major open gynecologic cancer surgery.

作者信息

Ferguson Sarah E, Malhotra Tim, Seshan Venkatraman E, Levine Douglas A, Sonoda Yukio, Chi Dennis S, Barakat Richard R, Abu-Rustum Nadeem R

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology, Division Gynecologic Oncology Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Jul;114(1):111-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.03.014. Epub 2009 Apr 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of perioperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) compared to postoperative intravenous (IV) patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) on postoperative recovery parameters after major open gynecologic surgery.

METHODS

A randomized controlled clinical trial included women undergoing laparotomy for a gynecologic disorder. Patients were randomized to postoperative IV morphine PCA (control arm) or to postoperative morphine-bupivacaine PCEA (treatment arm). Postoperative outcomes such as pain, and length of hospital stay were compared with an intention-to-treat analysis. The primary endpoint was postoperative pain at rest and when coughing--assessed by a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS).

RESULTS

Between 9/04 and 6/07, 153 patients were randomized and 135 were evaluable (PCEA=67; PCA=68). Over 75% of the women in this study had gynecologic cancer. Patients in the PCEA arm had significantly less postoperative pain at rest on Day 1 and during the first 3 postoperative days when coughing compared to the PCA arm (P<0.05). The mean pain score at rest on Day 1 was 3.3 for the PCEA group compared to 4.3 for the PCA group (P=0.01). Overall, postoperative pain at rest and while coughing in the first 6 days was less in women treated with PCEA compared to PCA (P<0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

PCEA offers superior postoperative pain control after laparotomy for gynecologic surgery compared to traditional IV PCA. Women requiring major open surgery for gynecologic cancer should be offered PCEA for postoperative pain management if there are no contraindications.

摘要

目的

确定与术后静脉自控镇痛(PCA)相比,围手术期患者自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)对大型开放性妇科手术后恢复参数的影响。

方法

一项随机对照临床试验纳入了因妇科疾病接受剖腹手术的女性。患者被随机分为术后静脉注射吗啡PCA(对照组)或术后吗啡-布比卡因PCEA(治疗组)。采用意向性分析比较术后疼痛、住院时间等结果。主要终点是静息和咳嗽时的术后疼痛,通过10分视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估。

结果

在2004年9月至2007年6月期间,153例患者被随机分组,135例可进行评估(PCEA组=67例;PCA组=68例)。本研究中超过75%的女性患有妇科癌症。与PCA组相比,PCEA组患者在术后第1天静息时以及术后前3天咳嗽时的术后疼痛明显减轻(P<0.05)。PCEA组术后第1天静息时的平均疼痛评分为3.3分,而PCA组为4.3分(P=0.01)。总体而言,与PCA组相比,PCEA治疗的女性在术后前6天静息和咳嗽时的疼痛较轻(P<0.003)。

结论

与传统的静脉PCA相比,PCEA在妇科手术剖腹术后提供了更好的术后疼痛控制。如果没有禁忌症,对于因妇科癌症需要进行大型开放性手术的女性,应提供PCEA进行术后疼痛管理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验