Livingston Victoria J, Bonnan Matthew F, Elsey Ruth M, Sandrik Jennifer L, Wilhite D Ray
Department of Biological Sciences, Functional Morphology and Evolutionary Anatomy (FMEA) Working Group, Western Illinois University, Macomb, Illinois 61455, USA.
Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2009 Jun;292(6):787-97. doi: 10.1002/ar.20912.
Bipedalism evolved multiple times within archosaurs, and relatively shorter forelimbs characterize both crocodyliforms and nonavian dinosaurs. Analysis of a comprehensive ontogenetic sequence of specimens (embryo to adult) of the sauropodomorph Massospondylus has shown that bipedal limb proportions result from negative forelimb allometry. We ask, is negative forelimb allometry a pattern basal to archosaurs, amplified in certain taxa to produce bipedalism? Given the phylogenetic position of extant crocodylians and their relatively shorter forelimb, we tested the hypothesis that prevalent negative forelimb allometry is present in Alligator mississippiensis from a sample of wild specimens from embryonic to adult sizes. Long bone lengths (humerus, radius, ulna, femur, tibia, fibula, third metapodials) were measured with their epiphyseal cartilage intact at all sizes. Our results show an overall isometric pattern for most elements regressed on femur length, humerus length, or total limb length. However, negative allometry was prevalent for the ulna, and the third metapodials scale with positive allometry embryonically. These data suggest that the general forelimb proportions in relation to the hindlimb do not change significantly with increasing size in A. mississippiensis. The negative allometry of the ulna and embryonicaly positive allometry of the third metapodials appears to be related to maintaining the functional integrity of the limbs. We show that this pattern is different from that of the sauropodomorph Massospondylus, and we suggest that if bipedalism in archosaurs is tied, in part, to negative forearm allometry, it was either secondarily lost through isometric scaling, or never developed in the ancestor of A. mississippiensis.
两足行走在主龙类中多次演化,相对较短的前肢是鳄形类和非鸟恐龙的共同特征。对蜥脚形亚目恐龙大椎龙从胚胎到成年的完整个体发育序列标本进行分析后发现,两足的肢体比例是由前肢负异速生长导致的。我们不禁要问,前肢负异速生长是否是主龙类的一种基本模式,在某些类群中被放大从而产生了两足行走?鉴于现存鳄类的系统发育位置及其相对较短的前肢,我们从胚胎到成年大小的野生密西西比鳄样本中检验了普遍存在前肢负异速生长这一假说。测量了所有大小标本完整骨骺软骨状态下的长骨长度(肱骨、桡骨、尺骨、股骨、胫骨、腓骨、第三掌骨)。我们的结果显示,大多数元素相对于股骨长度、肱骨长度或总肢体长度的回归呈现出整体等速模式。然而,尺骨普遍存在负异速生长,第三掌骨在胚胎期呈正异速生长。这些数据表明,密西西比鳄中前肢与后肢的总体比例不会随着体型增大而显著变化。尺骨的负异速生长以及第三掌骨胚胎期的正异速生长似乎与维持肢体的功能完整性有关。我们表明这种模式与蜥脚形亚目恐龙大椎龙不同,并且我们认为,如果主龙类的两足行走部分与前臂负异速生长有关,那么它要么是通过等速缩放而次生丧失,要么在密西西比鳄的祖先中从未发育出来。