• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用药物洗脱支架行临时边支T型支架置入术治疗分叉冠状动脉疾病患者的2年预后

2-year outcome of patients treated for bifurcation coronary disease with provisional side branch T-stenting using drug-eluting stents.

作者信息

Routledge Helen C, Morice Marie-Claude, Lefèvre Thierry, Garot Philippe, De Marco Federico, Vaquerizo Beatriz, Louvard Yves

机构信息

ICPS Institut Cardiovasculaire, Paris Sud, Massy, France.

出版信息

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Aug;1(4):358-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.05.005.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2008.05.005
PMID:19463330
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Our goal was to determine whether the deployment of drug-eluting stents (DES) in bifurcation lesions, according to a uniform provisional side-branch T-stenting strategy (PTS), is a safe and effective treatment in the immediate and long term.

BACKGROUND

In comparison with simple stenoses, successful percutaneous intervention for coronary bifurcation lesions is limited by a higher incidence of procedural complications and need for repeat revascularization. The ideal strategy to overcome these limitations remains to be demonstrated while recent controversy surrounds the long-term safety of DES in bifurcations.

METHODS

Consecutive patients treated for bifurcation lesions using DES were studied in a prospective single-center registry. Between 2003 to 2005, 477 procedures were performed. The PTS strategy was used in 92%, with a side-branch stent in 28% and final kissing balloon inflation in 95%.

RESULTS

Angiographic success was achieved in 99% with 2.5% in-hospital major adverse cardiac events. The cumulative rate of major adverse cardiac events was 10.7% at 1 year and 13.6% at 2 years, including 6.9% and 8.9% target vessel revascularization. Deviation from the PTS strategy independently predicted 2-year mortality (odds ratio: 5.5 [95% confidence interval: 1.63 to 18.3], p < 0.01). The rate of definite or probable stent thrombosis at 2 years was 2.5% with half of all events occurring before hospital discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

The PTS strategy for the treatment of bifurcation lesions is applicable to over 90% of patients in the real world. With DES, both safety and efficacy have been demonstrated in the long-term with <10% need for repeat revascularization in the first 2 years and a low incidence of late stent thrombosis.

摘要

目的

我们的目标是确定根据统一的临时分支T型支架置入策略(PTS)在分叉病变中植入药物洗脱支架(DES)在近期和长期是否为安全有效的治疗方法。

背景

与单纯狭窄相比,冠状动脉分叉病变的成功经皮介入治疗受到手术并发症发生率较高和需要重复血运重建的限制。克服这些限制的理想策略仍有待证明,而近期关于DES在分叉病变中的长期安全性存在争议。

方法

在一项前瞻性单中心登记研究中,对使用DES治疗分叉病变的连续患者进行研究。2003年至2005年期间,共进行了477例手术。92%的患者采用了PTS策略,28%的患者置入了分支支架,95%的患者进行了最终球囊对吻扩张。

结果

血管造影成功率为99%,住院期间主要不良心脏事件发生率为2.5%。1年时主要不良心脏事件的累积发生率为10.7%,2年时为13.6%,包括6.9%和8.9%的靶血管血运重建。偏离PTS策略可独立预测2年死亡率(比值比:5.5[95%置信区间:1.63至18.3],p<0.01)。2年时明确或可能的支架血栓形成率为2.5%,所有事件的一半发生在出院前。

结论

治疗分叉病变的PTS策略适用于现实世界中超过90%的患者。使用DES,长期安全性和有效性均得到证实,前2年重复血运重建的需求<10%,晚期支架血栓形成发生率低。

相似文献

1
2-year outcome of patients treated for bifurcation coronary disease with provisional side branch T-stenting using drug-eluting stents.使用药物洗脱支架行临时边支T型支架置入术治疗分叉冠状动脉疾病患者的2年预后
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Aug;1(4):358-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.05.005.
2
Drug eluting stenting in bifurcation coronary lesions long-term results applying a systematic treatment strategy.药物洗脱支架治疗分叉病变冠状动脉的长期结果:应用系统治疗策略。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Mar 1;79(4):615-22. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23180. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
3
A provisional strategy for treating true bifurcation lesions employing a scoring balloon for the side branch: final results of the AGILITY trial.采用边支评分球囊治疗真性分叉病变的临时策略:AGILITY 试验的最终结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Sep 1;82(3):352-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24630. Epub 2013 Mar 9.
4
Randomized Comparison of FFR-Guided and Angiography-Guided Provisional Stenting of True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: The DKCRUSH-VI Trial (Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions VI).随机比较血流储备分数指导下和血管造影指导下的真性冠状动脉分叉病变的临时支架置入术:DKCRUSH-VI 试验(双对吻挤压术与分叉病变治疗中临时支架置入术的 VI 代技术)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Apr 20;8(4):536-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.12.221. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
5
Randomized Comparisons Between Different Stenting Approaches for Bifurcation Coronary Lesions With or Without Side Branch Stenosis.随机比较伴或不伴分支狭窄的分叉病变的不同支架置入方法。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Apr 20;8(4):550-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.01.016.
6
Unprotected left main stenting with a second-generation drug-eluting stent: one-year outcomes of the LEMAX Pilot study.无保护左主干支架置入术联合第二代药物洗脱支架:LEMAX Pilot 研究一年随访结果。
EuroIntervention. 2011 Oct 30;7(6):689-96. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7I6A111.
7
Safety and efficacy of drug-eluting balloons in percutaneous treatment of bifurcation lesions: the DEBIUT (drug-eluting balloon in bifurcation Utrecht) registry.药物洗脱球囊在经皮治疗分叉病变中的安全性和有效性:DEBIUT(乌得勒支分叉病变药物洗脱球囊)注册研究
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Apr 1;71(5):629-35. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21452.
8
Long-term outcome of provisional side-branch T-stenting for the treatment of unprotected distal left main coronary artery disease.为治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉远端病变而行的边支 T 型支架术的长期疗效。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 May 1;77(6):765-72. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22899. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
9
3-year follow-up of 100 consecutive coronary bifurcation lesions treated with Taxus stents and the crush technique.100 例连续冠状动脉分叉病变采用 Taxus 支架和 crush 技术治疗的 3 年随访结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Mar 1;75(4):605-13. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22252.
10
A randomized clinical study comparing double kissing crush with provisional stenting for treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions: results from the DKCRUSH-II (Double Kissing Crush versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions) trial.一项比较双对吻挤压与预扩张支架术治疗冠状动脉分叉病变的随机临床试验:来自 DKCRUSH-II 试验(双对吻挤压与预扩张支架术治疗冠状动脉分叉病变的对比研究)的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Feb 22;57(8):914-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.10.023.

引用本文的文献

1
Two-Year clinical outcomes after coronary bifurcation stenting in older patients from Korea and Italy.韩国和意大利老年患者冠状动脉分叉处支架置入术后的两年临床结果。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Mar 23;10:1106594. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1106594. eCollection 2023.
2
Predictors and complications of side branch occlusion after recanalization of chronic total occlusions complicated with bifurcation lesions.慢性完全闭塞合并分叉病变血管内再通后分支闭塞的预测因素及并发症。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 24;11(1):4460. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83458-9.
3
The role of intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention of complex coronary lesions.
血管内超声在复杂冠状动脉病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的作用。
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2020 Oct;10(5):1371-1388. doi: 10.21037/cdt-20-189.
4
In-stent Anchoring Facilitating Side-branch Balloon Delivery for Final Kissing: A Prospective, Single-center Registry Study.支架内锚定辅助侧支球囊输送用于最终亲吻技术:一项前瞻性单中心注册研究
Chin Med J (Engl). 2016 Nov 20;129(22):2666-2669. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.193439.
5
Bifurcation lesion morphology and intravascular ultrasound assessment.分叉病变形态学和血管内超声评估。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Feb;27(2):189-96. doi: 10.1007/s10554-011-9846-x. Epub 2011 Mar 17.