• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用边支评分球囊治疗真性分叉病变的临时策略:AGILITY 试验的最终结果。

A provisional strategy for treating true bifurcation lesions employing a scoring balloon for the side branch: final results of the AGILITY trial.

机构信息

NewYork Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York; Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Sep 1;82(3):352-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24630. Epub 2013 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.24630
PMID:22927100
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The provisional approach for bifurcation stenting with side-branch balloon angioplasty is associated with dissections and suboptimal results requiring kissing balloon techniques or bailout stenting. We hypothesized that using a scoring balloon for the side branch and a drug-eluting stent for the main vessel might improve outcomes of true bifurcation lesions.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 93 patients with complex bifurcations were enrolled in a multicenter, single-arm, prospective clinical trial. A drug-eluting stent was deployed in the main vessel following dilatation of the side-branch stenosis with a scoring balloon. The overall angiographic success rate was 93.5%, and procedural success rate was 91.4%. The final diameter stenosis was 13.9% ± 7.2% for the main vessel and 33.3% ± 22.9% for the side branch. Crossover to stent deployment in the side branch was required in 10.8%. The postscoring balloon dissection rate was 8.2% and 6% (all ≤ class C) for the main vessel and side branch respectively, which was reduced to 1.1 and 2.1% poststenting. At 9-month follow-up, the composite MACE rate [cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization (TLR)] was 5.4%, including a TLR rate of 3.3% (1.1% from hospital discharge to 9 months).

CONCLUSION

The 9-month results of the AGILITY trial support a simple provisional strategy for treating complex true bifurcation lesions with deployment of a drug-eluting stent in the main vessel after dilatation of the side-branch vessel with a scoring balloon. This strategy was associated with excellent and safe procedural results, a low rate of crossover to side-branch stenting, and favorable outcomes.

摘要

背景

采用边支球囊血管成形术的分叉支架置入术的临时方法与夹层和不理想的结果相关,需要采用对吻球囊技术或挽救性支架置入术。我们假设,使用边支的切割球囊和主血管的药物洗脱支架可能会改善真正分叉病变的结果。

方法和结果

共纳入 93 例复杂分叉病变患者,进行了一项多中心、单臂、前瞻性临床试验。边支狭窄采用切割球囊扩张后,在主血管内置入药物洗脱支架。总的血管造影成功率为 93.5%,手术成功率为 91.4%。主血管的最终直径狭窄率为 13.9%±7.2%,边支为 33.3%±22.9%。10.8%的患者需要边支支架置入。主血管和边支的 postscoring balloon 夹层发生率分别为 8.2%和 6%(均为 ≤ C 类),支架置入后分别降低至 1.1%和 2.1%。9 个月随访时,复合终点事件(MACCE)发生率为 5.4%,包括 3.3%的靶病变血运重建(TLR)(1.1%的患者从出院到 9 个月)。

结论

AGILITY 试验的 9 个月结果支持一种简单的临时策略,即采用切割球囊扩张边支血管后,在主血管内置入药物洗脱支架治疗复杂的真性分叉病变。该策略具有出色且安全的手术结果、较低的边支支架置入率和良好的预后。

相似文献

1
A provisional strategy for treating true bifurcation lesions employing a scoring balloon for the side branch: final results of the AGILITY trial.采用边支评分球囊治疗真性分叉病变的临时策略:AGILITY 试验的最终结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Sep 1;82(3):352-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24630. Epub 2013 Mar 9.
2
Drug-eluting stents in bifurcation lesions: to stent one branch or both?分叉病变中的药物洗脱支架:支架置入一个分支还是两个分支?
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Dec;68(6):891-6. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20870.
3
True coronary bifurcation lesions: meta-analysis and review of literature.真性冠状动脉分叉病变:荟萃分析及文献复习。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2010 Feb;11(2):103-10. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e32832ffc85.
4
Randomized Comparison of FFR-Guided and Angiography-Guided Provisional Stenting of True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: The DKCRUSH-VI Trial (Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions VI).随机比较血流储备分数指导下和血管造影指导下的真性冠状动脉分叉病变的临时支架置入术:DKCRUSH-VI 试验(双对吻挤压术与分叉病变治疗中临时支架置入术的 VI 代技术)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Apr 20;8(4):536-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.12.221. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
5
Drug eluting stenting in bifurcation coronary lesions long-term results applying a systematic treatment strategy.药物洗脱支架治疗分叉病变冠状动脉的长期结果:应用系统治疗策略。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Mar 1;79(4):615-22. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23180. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
6
2-year outcome of patients treated for bifurcation coronary disease with provisional side branch T-stenting using drug-eluting stents.使用药物洗脱支架行临时边支T型支架置入术治疗分叉冠状动脉疾病患者的2年预后
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Aug;1(4):358-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.05.005.
7
The Glider registry.滑翔机注册库。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jan;89(1):E1-E6. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25040. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
8
DANUBIO - a new drug-eluting balloon for the treatment of side branches in bifurcation lesions: six-month angiographic follow-up results of the DEBSIDE trial.DANUBIO - 一种用于治疗分叉病变中分支的新型药物洗脱球囊:DEBSIDE试验的六个月血管造影随访结果
EuroIntervention. 2015 Dec;11(8):868-76. doi: 10.4244/EIJV11I8A177.
9
A randomized trial of a dedicated bifurcation stent versus provisional stenting in the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions.冠状动脉分叉病变治疗中专用分叉支架与预扩张支架的随机试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Feb 17;65(6):533-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.11.031.
10
A randomized clinical study comparing double kissing crush with provisional stenting for treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions: results from the DKCRUSH-II (Double Kissing Crush versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions) trial.一项比较双对吻挤压与预扩张支架术治疗冠状动脉分叉病变的随机临床试验:来自 DKCRUSH-II 试验(双对吻挤压与预扩张支架术治疗冠状动脉分叉病变的对比研究)的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Feb 22;57(8):914-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.10.023.

引用本文的文献

1
Intravascular Lithotripsy for Calcific Coronary Bifurcations: Procedural Success and 1-Year Clinical Outcomes.钙化性冠状动脉分叉病变的血管内碎石术:手术成功率及1年临床结局
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Aug;106(2):1489-1498. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31713. Epub 2025 Jun 23.
2
Impact of Lesion Preparation Technique on Side Branch Compromise in Calcified Coronary Bifurcations: A Subgroup Analysis of the PREPARE-CALC Trial.病变准备技术对钙化分叉病变中边支受损的影响:PREPARE-CALC 试验的亚组分析。
J Interv Cardiol. 2020 Nov 11;2020:9740938. doi: 10.1155/2020/9740938. eCollection 2020.
3
Calcific lesion preparation for coronary bifurcation stenting.
冠状动脉分叉病变支架置入术的钙化病变准备。
Cardiol J. 2019;26(5):429-437. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2019.0094. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
4
Contemporary Management of Stent Failure: Part One.支架失败的当代管理:第一部分。
Interv Cardiol. 2019 Feb;14(1):10-16. doi: 10.15420/icr.2018.39.1.