Chan Mark Y, Mahaffey Kenneth W, Sun Lena J, Pieper Karen S, White Harvey D, Aylward Philip E, Ferguson James J, Califf Robert M, Roe Matthew T
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Aug;1(4):369-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.03.019.
We sought to characterize the utilization and impact of a conservative medical management strategy for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE ACS) and significant coronary artery disease on early angiography.
Practice guidelines recommend an early invasive management strategy for NSTE ACS, but revascularization procedures may not always be performed after early angiography, even when significant coronary artery disease is present.
We evaluated 8,225 intermediate- to high-risk NSTE ACS patients with at least 1 coronary lesion >50% stenosis on early angiography from the SYNERGY (Superior Yield of the New Strategy of Enoxaparin, Revascularization, and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors) trial (2001 to 2003), comparing patients treated with conservative medical management with those who underwent in-hospital percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) within 7 days of randomization.
A total of 2,633 patients (32%) were medically managed, 4,294 (52%) underwent PCI, and 1,298 (16%) underwent CABG. The strongest independent predictors of conservative medical management versus any intervention were prior CABG, lower body weight, lack of a reinfarction between randomization and catheterization, and 3-vessel disease. With conservative medical management, the cumulative risk of 1-year mortality after discharge increased rapidly during the first 90 days and thereafter remained higher at 7.7% compared with that seen in patients treated with PCI (3.6%) or CABG (6.2%).
One-third of patients with NSTE ACS and significant coronary disease on early angiography were managed without in-hospital revascularization in the SYNERGY trial, and these patients had an increased risk of late mortality. These findings highlight the need for novel treatment approaches for NSTE ACS patients who are not candidates for revascularization. (SYNERGY trial; NCT00043784).
我们试图描述非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE ACS)且患有严重冠状动脉疾病的患者采用保守药物治疗策略对早期血管造影的利用情况及影响。
实践指南推荐对NSTE ACS采用早期侵入性治疗策略,但即使存在严重冠状动脉疾病,早期血管造影后也并非总是进行血运重建手术。
我们评估了来自SYNERGY(依诺肝素、血运重建和糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂新策略的卓越疗效)试验(2001年至2003年)的8225例中高危NSTE ACS患者,这些患者在早期血管造影时有至少1处冠状动脉病变狭窄>50%,比较了接受保守药物治疗的患者与随机分组后7天内接受院内经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)或冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的患者。
共有2633例患者(32%)接受药物治疗,4294例(52%)接受PCI,1298例(16%)接受CABG。与任何干预措施相比,保守药物治疗的最强独立预测因素是既往CABG、体重较低、随机分组至导管插入术期间无再梗死以及三支血管病变。采用保守药物治疗时,出院后1年死亡率的累积风险在最初90天内迅速增加,此后与接受PCI治疗的患者(3.6%)或CABG治疗的患者(6.2%)相比,仍较高,为7.7%。
在SYNERGY试验中,三分之一早期血管造影显示患有NSTE ACS且有严重冠状动脉疾病的患者未进行院内血运重建治疗,这些患者的晚期死亡风险增加。这些发现凸显了对不适合血运重建的NSTE ACS患者需要新的治疗方法。(SYNERGY试验;NCT00043784)