Roe Matthew T, White Jennifer A, Kaul Padma, Tricoci Pierluigi, Lokhnygina Yuliya, Miller Chadwick D, van't Hof Arnoud W, Montalescot Gilles, James Stefan K, Saucedo Jorge, Ohman E Magnus, Pollack Charles V, Hochman Judith S, Armstrong Paul W, Giugliano Robert P, Harrington Robert A, Van de Werf Frans, Califf Robert M, Newby L Kristin
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Mar 1;5(2):205-13. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.962332. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
Regional differences in the profile and prognosis of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE ACS) patients treated with medical management after angiography remain uncertain.
Using data from the Early Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibition in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes (EARLY ACS) trial, we examined regional variations in the use of an in-hospital medical management strategy in NSTE ACS patients who had significant coronary artery disease (CAD) identified during angiography, factors associated with the use of a medical management strategy, and 1-year mortality rates. Of 9406 patients, 8387 (89%) underwent angiography and had significant CAD; thereafter, 1766 (21%) were treated solely with a medical management strategy (range: 18% to 23% across 4 major geographic regions). Factors most strongly associated with a medical management strategy were negative baseline troponin values, prior coronary artery bypass grafting, lower baseline hemoglobin values, and greater number of diseased vessels; region was not a significant factor. One-year mortality was higher among patients treated with a medical management strategy compared with those who underwent revascularization (7.8% versus 3.6%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.21-1.76), with no significant interaction by region (interaction probability value=0.42).
Approximately 20% of NSTE ACS patients with significant CAD in an international trial were treated solely with an in-hospital medical management strategy after early angiography, with no regional differences in factors associated with medical management or the risk of 1-year mortality. These findings have important implications for the conduct of future clinical trials, and highlight global similarities in the profile and prognosis of medically managed NSTE ACS patients.
血管造影术后接受药物治疗的非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE ACS)患者的特征和预后的地区差异仍不明确。
利用非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征早期糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制(EARLY ACS)试验的数据,我们研究了血管造影时确诊为严重冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的NSTE ACS患者住院药物治疗策略的使用情况的地区差异、与药物治疗策略使用相关的因素以及1年死亡率。在9406例患者中,8387例(89%)接受了血管造影且患有严重CAD;此后,1766例(21%)仅接受药物治疗策略(范围:4个主要地理区域为18%至23%)。与药物治疗策略最密切相关的因素是基线肌钙蛋白值为阴性、既往冠状动脉旁路移植术、较低的基线血红蛋白值和更多的病变血管;地区不是一个显著因素。与接受血运重建的患者相比,接受药物治疗策略的患者1年死亡率更高(7.8%对3.6%;调整后的风险比为1.46;95%CI为1.21 - 1.76),且地区间无显著交互作用(交互概率值 = 0.42)。
在一项国际试验中,约20%的早期血管造影后确诊为严重CAD的NSTE ACS患者仅接受住院药物治疗策略,在与药物治疗相关的因素或1年死亡风险方面无地区差异。这些发现对未来临床试验的开展具有重要意义,并突出了药物治疗的NSTE ACS患者的特征和预后的全球相似性。