Suppr超能文献

药物洗脱支架非标签使用的结局和并发症:STENT(新疗法的战略导管评估)组的结果

Outcomes and complications with off-label use of drug-eluting stents: results from the STENT (Strategic Transcatheter Evaluation of New Therapies) group.

作者信息

Brodie Bruce R, Stuckey Thomas, Downey William, Humphrey Angela, Bradshaw Barbara, Metzger Chris, Hermiller James, Krainin Fred, Juk Stanley, Cheek Barry, Duffy Peter, Smith Henry, Edmunds John, Varanasi Jay, Simonton Charles A

机构信息

LeBauer Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Aug;1(4):405-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.06.005.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluates outcomes and complications in patients treated with drug-eluting stents (DES) for "off-label" indications.

BACKGROUND

Drug-eluting stents have been effective in randomized trials, but their safety and efficacy for off-label indications has not been well studied.

METHODS

The STENT (Strategic Transcatheter Evaluation of New Therapies) Registry is the largest multicenter U.S. registry evaluating outcomes of DES. Off-label indications included ostial, left main, long, bifurcation, and in-stent restenotic lesions, saphenous vein grafts, chronic total occlusions, small or large vessels, multilesion or multivessel percutaneous coronary interventions, and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Outcomes were adjusted using Cox proportional hazards regression and propensity analyses.

RESULTS

Drug-eluting stents were used in an off-label manner in 59% of patients. The patients who received off-label treatment were more often male, had a higher incidence of prior infarction and bypass surgery, and lower ejection fractions. Off-label versus "on-label" use of DES was associated with higher rates of death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, major adverse cardiac events, and stent thrombosis at 9 months and 2 years. Off-label use of DES compared with off-label use of bare-metal stents (BMS) had lower rates of death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and major adverse cardiac events at 9 months and 2 years and lower rates of stent thrombosis at 9 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Off-label use of DES is associated with higher event rates compared with on-label use of DES, which is consistent with a higher risk clinical and lesion profile. However, event rates with off-label use of DES are lower compared with off-label use of BMS. Pending results from randomized trials, our data support the use of DES for off-label indications in selected patients.

摘要

目的

本研究评估接受药物洗脱支架(DES)治疗“非标签”适应症患者的疗效和并发症。

背景

药物洗脱支架在随机试验中已显示出有效性,但其用于非标签适应症的安全性和有效性尚未得到充分研究。

方法

STENT(新疗法的战略导管评估)注册研究是美国最大的评估DES疗效的多中心注册研究。非标签适应症包括开口处、左主干、长病变、分叉病变、支架内再狭窄病变、大隐静脉桥血管病变、慢性完全闭塞病变、小血管或大血管病变、多病变或多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗以及ST段抬高型心肌梗死。使用Cox比例风险回归和倾向分析对结果进行调整。

结果

59%的患者以非标签方式使用了药物洗脱支架。接受非标签治疗的患者男性更多,既往梗死和搭桥手术的发生率更高,射血分数更低。与“标签内”使用DES相比,非标签使用DES在9个月和2年时死亡、心肌梗死、靶血管重建、主要不良心脏事件和支架血栓形成的发生率更高。与非标签使用裸金属支架(BMS)相比,非标签使用DES在9个月和2年时死亡、心肌梗死、靶血管重建和主要不良心脏事件的发生率更低,在9个月时支架血栓形成的发生率也更低。

结论

与标签内使用DES相比,非标签使用DES与更高的事件发生率相关,这与更高风险的临床和病变特征一致。然而,与非标签使用BMS相比,非标签使用DES的事件发生率更低。在随机试验结果出来之前,我们的数据支持在特定患者中使用DES治疗非标签适应症。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验