• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年I期非小细胞肺癌的解剖性肺段切除术

Anatomic segmentectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer in the elderly.

作者信息

Kilic Arman, Schuchert Matthew J, Pettiford Brian L, Pennathur Arjun, Landreneau James R, Landreneau Joshua P, Luketich James D, Landreneau Rodney J

机构信息

Heart, Lung, and Esophageal Surgery Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jun;87(6):1662-6; discussion 1667-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.02.097.

DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.02.097
PMID:19463574
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anatomic segmentectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) offers the potential of surgical cure with preservation of lung function. This may be of particular importance in elderly NSCLC patients with declining cardiopulmonary status and a limited life expectancy.

METHODS

The study compared outcomes of 78 elderly patients (aged > 75 years) with stage I NSCLC undergoing segmentectomy and 106 undergoing lobectomy for stage I NSCLC from 2002 to 2007. Primary outcome variables included perioperative morbidity and mortality, hospital course, recurrence patterns, and survival.

RESULTS

Age, gender, tumor histology, and surgical approach were similar between groups. Comorbidities were similar except for a higher incidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and diabetes in segmentectomy patients. The tumors in the lobectomy group were significantly larger (3.5 vs 2.5 cm, p = 0.0001). Operative mortality was 1.3% for segmentectomy and 4.7% for lobectomy. Segmentectomy patients had fewer major complications (11.5% vs 25.5%, p = 0.02). There were no differences in median hospitalization (7 vs 6 days). The estimated overall survival at 2, 3, and 5 years was 76%, 69%, and 46% for segmentectomy patients and 68%, 59%, and 47% for lobectomy patients (p = 0.28). The 5-year disease-free survival was equivalent (segmentectomy, 49.8%; lobectomy, 45.5%; p = 0.80).

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomic segmentectomy can be performed safely in elderly patients with early-stage NSCLC. This approach is associated with reduced perioperative complications and comparable oncologic efficacy compared with lobectomy in older patients with a limited life expectancy.

摘要

背景

对于Ⅰ期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC),解剖性肺段切除术有望实现手术治愈并保留肺功能。这对于心肺功能逐渐下降且预期寿命有限的老年NSCLC患者可能尤为重要。

方法

该研究比较了2002年至2007年间78例接受肺段切除术的Ⅰ期NSCLC老年患者(年龄>75岁)和106例接受肺叶切除术的Ⅰ期NSCLC老年患者的治疗结果。主要结局变量包括围手术期发病率和死亡率、住院过程、复发模式和生存率。

结果

两组患者的年龄、性别、肿瘤组织学和手术方式相似。合并症情况相似,但肺段切除术患者慢性阻塞性肺疾病和糖尿病的发病率较高。肺叶切除术组的肿瘤明显更大(3.5 vs 2.5 cm,p = 0.0001)。肺段切除术的手术死亡率为1.3%,肺叶切除术为4.7%。肺段切除术患者的主要并发症较少(11.5% vs 25.5%,p = 0.02)。中位住院时间无差异(7天 vs 6天)。肺段切除术患者2年、3年和5年的估计总生存率分别为76%、69%和46%,肺叶切除术患者分别为68%、59%和47%(p = 0.28)。5年无病生存率相当(肺段切除术,49.8%;肺叶切除术,45.5%;p = 0.80)。

结论

解剖性肺段切除术可在老年早期NSCLC患者中安全进行。与肺叶切除术相比,这种方法在预期寿命有限的老年患者中与围手术期并发症减少以及相当的肿瘤学疗效相关。

相似文献

1
Anatomic segmentectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer in the elderly.老年I期非小细胞肺癌的解剖性肺段切除术
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jun;87(6):1662-6; discussion 1667-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.02.097.
2
Impact of tumor size on outcomes after anatomic lung resection for stage 1A non-small cell lung cancer based on the current staging system.基于现行分期系统,肿瘤大小对 1A 期非小细胞肺癌解剖性肺切除术后结局的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Feb;143(2):390-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.10.023. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
3
Anatomic segmentectomy in the treatment of stage I non-small cell lung cancer.解剖性肺段切除术治疗Ⅰ期非小细胞肺癌。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Sep;84(3):926-32; discussion 932-3. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.05.007.
4
A case-matched study of anatomical segmentectomy versus lobectomy for stage I lung cancer in high-risk patients.一项针对高危患者I期肺癌行解剖性肺段切除术与肺叶切除术的病例对照研究。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005 Apr;27(4):675-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.01.006.
5
Influence of age and IB status after resection of node-negative non-small cell lung cancer.淋巴结阴性非小细胞肺癌切除术后年龄和 IB 状态的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Mar;93(3):929-35; discussion 935-6. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.09.047.
6
Segmental resection spares pulmonary function in patients with stage I lung cancer.肺段切除术可保留I期肺癌患者的肺功能。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Jul;78(1):228-33; discussion 228-33. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.01.024.
7
Thoracoscopic segmentectomy compares favorably with thoracoscopic lobectomy for patients with small stage I lung cancer.对于早期小肺癌患者,电视胸腔镜肺段切除术与电视胸腔镜肺叶切除术相比具有优势。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Jun;137(6):1388-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.02.009. Epub 2009 Apr 11.
8
Anatomic segmentectomy for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: comparison of video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open approach.I期非小细胞肺癌的解剖性肺段切除术:电视辅助胸腔镜手术与开放手术的比较
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Dec;138(6):1318-25.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.08.028.
9
Factors associated with outcome of segmentectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: long-term follow-up study at a single institution in Japan.非小细胞肺癌肺段切除术预后的相关因素:日本某单一机构的长期随访研究
Lung Cancer. 2007 Nov;58(2):231-7. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.06.014. Epub 2007 Jul 30.
10
Oncologic efficacy of anatomic segmentectomy in stage IA lung cancer patients with T1a tumors.T1a 期肺癌患者解剖性肺段切除术的肿瘤学疗效。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Feb;93(2):381-7; discussion 387-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.10.079. Epub 2011 Dec 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing Outcomes in Clinical Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Tumors up to Two Centimeters in Diameter in Segmentectomy vs. Lobectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.肺段切除术与肺叶切除术治疗直径达2厘米的临床I期非小细胞肺癌的疗效评估:系统评价与荟萃分析
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb;16(1):279-289. doi: 10.1007/s13193-024-02080-z. Epub 2024 Sep 7.
2
Clinically important pulmonary vascular variations: a narrative review.具有临床意义的肺血管变异:一篇叙述性综述
J Thorac Dis. 2024 May 31;16(5):3406-3421. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-1715. Epub 2024 May 7.
3
The use of intravenous indocyanine green in minimally invasive segmental lung resections: a systematic review.
静脉注射吲哚菁绿在微创节段性肺切除术中的应用:一项系统评价
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2024 Mar 29;13(3):612-622. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-23-807. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
4
Computed tomography-based 3D convolutional neural network deep learning model for predicting micropapillary or solid growth pattern of invasive lung adenocarcinoma.基于计算机断层扫描的三维卷积神经网络深度学习模型预测浸润性肺腺癌的微乳头状或实性生长模式。
Radiol Med. 2024 May;129(5):776-784. doi: 10.1007/s11547-024-01800-3. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
5
Sublobar resection versus lobectomy for stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer ≤ 2 cm: a systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis.对于直径≤2 cm的IA期非小细胞肺癌,亚肺叶切除术与肺叶切除术的比较:一项系统评价和患者水平的荟萃分析。
Updates Surg. 2023 Dec;75(8):2343-2354. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01627-z. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
6
A guide for managing patients with stage I NSCLC: deciding between lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, SBRT and ablation-part 3: systematic review of evidence regarding surgery in compromised patients or specific tumors.I期非小细胞肺癌患者管理指南:肺叶切除术、肺段切除术、楔形切除术、立体定向体部放疗和消融术之间的抉择——第3部分:关于合并症患者或特定肿瘤手术证据的系统评价
J Thorac Dis. 2022 Jun;14(6):2387-2411. doi: 10.21037/jtd-21-1825.
7
Thoracoscopic Lobectomy Versus Sublobar Resection for pStage I Geriatric Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.胸腔镜肺叶切除术与肺段切除术治疗老年pI期非小细胞肺癌的对比研究
Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 24;11:777590. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.777590. eCollection 2021.
8
Segmentectomy and Wedge Resection for Elderly Patients with Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.老年I期非小细胞肺癌患者的肺段切除术和楔形切除术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Jan 6;11(2):294. doi: 10.3390/jcm11020294.
9
The Survival Advantage of Lobectomy over Wedge Resection Lessens as Health-Related Life Expectancy Decreases.随着与健康相关的预期寿命降低,肺叶切除术相对于楔形切除术的生存优势减弱。
JTO Clin Res Rep. 2021 Jan 21;2(3):100143. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2021.100143. eCollection 2021 Mar.
10
Demarcation of arteriopulmonary segments: a novel and effective method for the identification of pulmonary segments.肺动脉段划分:一种新颖有效的肺段识别方法。
J Int Med Res. 2021 May;49(5):3000605211014383. doi: 10.1177/03000605211014383.