Rangwala Hussain Sohail, Fatima Hareer, Mustafa Muhammad Saqlain, Shafique Muhammad Ashir, Imam Syed Irtiza, Abbas Syed Raza, Qazi Qurat Ul Ain, Iqbal Muhammad Osama
Department of Medicine, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Iqbal, Shaheed Rd, Karachi, Pakistan.
Department of Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb;16(1):279-289. doi: 10.1007/s13193-024-02080-z. Epub 2024 Sep 7.
Lung cancer, which accounted for 1.8 million fatalities in 2020, necessitates the investigation of optimal surgical approaches for early-stage cases. Although lobectomy has long been associated with successful results, the growing interest in segmentectomy as an alternative procedure warrants further examination. The primary objective of this study was to compare segmentectomy with lobectomy as a viable treatment option for early-stage lung cancer. Our systematic review of NSCLC studies comparing lobectomy to segmentectomy followed the PRISMA guidelines and used a random-effects model. We extracted the patient characteristics, outcomes (overall survival, disease-free survival, and recurrence), and postoperative complications. Statistical analyses included hazard ratios, risk ratios, sensitivity assessments, and bias evaluations, all of which were performed using a random-effects model to account for heterogeneity among studies. Twelve studies involving 6049 patients revealed that segmentectomy and lobectomy demonstrated comparable overall survival (OS), with an HR of 0.99 (95% CI 0.81-1.21, = 0.90). At 24 and 60 months, OS rates were RR = 0.95 (95% CI 0.92-0.97, = 0.0001) and RR = 0.81 (95% CI 0.67-0.98, = 0.03), respectively. Similarly, disease-free survival (DFS) results were comparable (HR = 1.01; 95% CI 0.86-1.19, = 0.87). DFS at 24 and 60 months demonstrated RR = 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-1.0, = 0.05) and RR = 0.82 (95% CI 0.70-0.97, = 0.02), respectively. The risk of lung cancer recurrence was similar between the two groups (RR = 0.98; 95% CI 0.75-1.30, = 0.26). Our study revealed that segmentectomy and lobectomy had identical oncological outcomes in terms of OS and DFS. Although segmentectomy showed a slightly higher complication rate, further research is needed to draw definitive conclusions, emphasizing the importance of additional randomized trials.
肺癌在2020年导致了180万人死亡,因此有必要对早期病例的最佳手术方法进行研究。尽管肺叶切除术长期以来都与成功的治疗结果相关,但作为一种替代手术,肺段切除术越来越受到关注,值得进一步研究。本研究的主要目的是比较肺段切除术和肺叶切除术作为早期肺癌可行治疗方案的效果。我们对非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)研究中比较肺叶切除术和肺段切除术的系统评价遵循PRISMA指南,并使用随机效应模型。我们提取了患者特征、结局(总生存期、无病生存期和复发情况)以及术后并发症。统计分析包括风险比、危险比、敏感性评估和偏倚评估,所有这些分析均使用随机效应模型进行,以考虑研究之间的异质性。12项涉及6049名患者的研究表明,肺段切除术和肺叶切除术的总生存期(OS)相当,危险比为0.99(95%置信区间0.81 - 1.21,P = 0.90)。在24个月和60个月时,总生存率的风险比分别为RR = 0.95(95%置信区间0.92 - 0.97,P = 0.0001)和RR = 0.81(95%置信区间0.67 - 0.98,P = 0.03)。同样,无病生存期(DFS)结果也相当(危险比 = 1.01;95%置信区间0.86 - 1.19,P = 0.87)。24个月和60个月时的无病生存率风险比分别为RR = 0.97(95%置信区间0.95 - 1.0,P = 0.05)和RR = 0.82(95%置信区间0.70 - 0.97,P = 0.02)。两组肺癌复发风险相似(风险比 = 0.98;95%置信区间0.75 - 1.30,P = 0.26)。我们的研究表明,在总生存期和无病生存期方面,肺段切除术和肺叶切除术的肿瘤学结局相同。尽管肺段切除术的并发症发生率略高,但需要进一步研究才能得出明确结论,这强调了额外进行随机试验的重要性。