Honjo Osami, Benson Lee N, Mewhort Holly E, Predescu Dragos, Holtby Helen, Van Arsdell Glen S, Caldarone Christopher A
Labatt Family Heart Centre, Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jun;87(6):1885-92; discussion 1892-3. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.03.061.
Hybrid strategies for single ventricle palliation may differ from Norwood strategies in terms of anatomic and physiologic growth stimuli to the pulmonary arteries (PA), hemodynamics, resource utilization, and survival. Few studies have directly compared these strategies.
In all, 58 patients underwent Norwood (Blalock-Taussig shunt; n = 39) or hybrid (n = 19) single ventricle palliation (2004 to 2007). Hemodynamics, PA morphology, hemodynamics, resource utilization, and survival were reviewed.
At pre-stage 2 evaluation, there were nonsignificant trends toward lower ventricular end-diastolic pressure, higher mixed venous saturation, and larger Nakata and lower lobe indices in the hybrids. Mean PA pressures were not different between groups. Four Norwood patients (10%) underwent transplantation before stage 2 palliation. Forty-two patients underwent stage 2 palliation (bidirectional cavopulmonary shunt or stage 2 hybrid (aortic arch reconstruction and bidirectional cavopulmonary shunt). Requirement for PA plasty, postoperative CVP, stage 2 survival, and 1-year survival were similar between groups. Combined (stage 1 plus stage 2) intubation time, intensive care unit time, and hospital length of stay was shorter for hybrids in comparison with Norwood survivors (p < 0.05). Comparison of resource utilization at the time of arch reconstruction (Norwood procedure or stage 2 hybrid), demonstrated a time-related trend toward improvement (weak negative correlation: intubation, rho = -0.386, p = 0.172; intensive care unit stay, rho = -0.487, p = 0.077; hospital stay, rho = -0.429, p = 0.126) in the hybrid group, but not in the Norwood group.
Hybrid palliation does not have a significant adverse impact on PA development, with comparable PA growth and hemodynamics. The demonstration of equivalent survival, diminished hospital utilization, and trends indicating ongoing refinement of the hybrid strategy warrants a prospective randomized trial.
单心室姑息治疗的混合策略在对肺动脉(PA)的解剖和生理生长刺激、血流动力学、资源利用及生存率方面可能与诺伍德策略有所不同。很少有研究直接比较这些策略。
2004年至2007年期间,共有58例患者接受了诺伍德(布莱洛克 - 陶西格分流术;n = 39)或混合(n = 19)单心室姑息治疗。对血流动力学、PA形态、血流动力学、资源利用及生存率进行了回顾分析。
在二期术前评估时,混合治疗组在降低心室舒张末期压力、提高混合静脉血氧饱和度以及增大中田指数和下叶指数方面有不显著的趋势。两组间平均PA压力无差异。4例诺伍德患者(10%)在二期姑息治疗前接受了移植。42例患者接受了二期姑息治疗(双向腔肺分流术或二期混合治疗(主动脉弓重建和双向腔肺分流术))。两组间PA成形术的需求、术后中心静脉压、二期生存率及1年生存率相似。与诺伍德幸存者相比,混合治疗组的联合(一期加二期)插管时间、重症监护病房时间及住院时间更短(p < 0.05)。对主动脉弓重建时(诺伍德手术或二期混合治疗)的资源利用进行比较,结果显示混合治疗组有与时间相关的改善趋势(弱负相关:插管,rho = -0.386,p = 0.172;重症监护病房停留时间,rho = -0.487,p = 0.077;住院时间,rho = -0.429,p = 0.126),而诺伍德组无此趋势。
混合姑息治疗对PA发育没有显著的不利影响,PA生长和血流动力学相当。等效生存率、减少的医院资源利用以及混合策略不断改进的趋势表明有必要进行一项前瞻性随机试验。