Talabot-Ayer Dominique, Lamacchia Céline, Gabay Cem, Palmer Gaby
Division of Rheumatology, University Hospital, and Department of Pathology and Immunology, University of Geneva School of Medicine, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland.
J Biol Chem. 2009 Jul 17;284(29):19420-6. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M901744200. Epub 2009 May 22.
The new interleukin (IL)-1 family cytokine IL-33 is synthesized as a 30-kDa precursor. Like pro-IL-1beta, human pro-IL-33 was reported to be cleaved by caspase-1 to generate an 18-kDa fragment, which is sufficient to activate signaling by the IL-33 receptor T1/ST2. However, the proposed caspase-1 cleavage site is poorly conserved between species. In addition, it is not clear whether caspase-1 cleavage of pro-IL-33 occurs in vivo and whether, as for IL-1beta, this cleavage is a prerequisite for IL-33 secretion and bioactivity. In this study, we further investigated caspase-1 cleavage of mouse and human pro-IL-33 and assessed the potential bioactivity of the IL-33 precursor. We observed the generation of a 20-kDa IL-33 fragment in cell lysates, which was enhanced by incubation with caspase-1. However, in vitro assays of mouse and human pro-IL-33 indicated that IL-33 is not a direct substrate for this enzyme. Consistently, caspase-1 activation in THP-1 cells induced cleavage of pro-IL-1beta but not of pro-IL-33, and activated THP-1 cells released full-length pro-IL-33 into culture supernatants. Finally, addition of full-length pro-IL-33 induced T1/ST2-dependent IL-6 secretion in mast cells. However, we observed in situ processing of pro-IL-33 in mast cell cultures, and it remains to be determined whether full-length pro-IL-33 itself indeed represents the bioactive species. In conclusion, our data indicate that pro-IL-33 is not a direct substrate for caspase-1. In addition, our results clearly show that caspase-1 cleavage is not required for pro-IL-33 secretion and bioactivity, highlighting major differences between IL-1beta and IL-33.
新型白细胞介素(IL)-1家族细胞因子IL-33以30 kDa的前体形式合成。与前IL-1β一样,据报道人源前IL-33可被半胱天冬酶-1切割产生一个18 kDa的片段,该片段足以激活IL-33受体T1/ST2的信号传导。然而,所提出的半胱天冬酶-1切割位点在物种间的保守性较差。此外,尚不清楚前IL-33的半胱天冬酶-1切割是否在体内发生,以及与IL-1β一样,这种切割是否是IL-33分泌和生物活性的先决条件。在本研究中,我们进一步研究了小鼠和人源前IL-33的半胱天冬酶-1切割,并评估了IL-33前体的潜在生物活性。我们在细胞裂解物中观察到一个20 kDa的IL-33片段的产生,与半胱天冬酶-1孵育后该片段增加。然而,对小鼠和人源前IL-33的体外分析表明,IL-33不是该酶的直接底物。一致地,THP-1细胞中的半胱天冬酶-1激活诱导了前IL-1β的切割,但未诱导前IL-33的切割,并且激活的THP-1细胞将全长前IL-33释放到培养上清液中。最后,添加全长前IL-33诱导肥大细胞中T1/ST2依赖性IL-6的分泌。然而,我们在肥大细胞培养物中观察到前IL-33的原位加工,全长前IL-33本身是否确实代表生物活性形式仍有待确定。总之,我们的数据表明前IL-33不是半胱天冬酶-1的直接底物。此外,我们的结果清楚地表明,前IL-33的分泌和生物活性不需要半胱天冬酶-1切割,突出了IL-1β和IL-33之间的主要差异。