Weishaupt M A, Byström A, von Peinen K, Wiestner T, Meyers H, Waldern N, Johnston C, van Weeren R, Roepstorff L
Equine Department, Vetsuisse Faculty University of Zurich, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
Equine Vet J. 2009 Mar;41(3):263-7. doi: 10.2746/042516409x397226.
The load acting on the limbs and the load distribution between fore- and hindlimbs while performing specific dressage exercises lack objective assessment.
The greater a horse's level of collection, the more load is shifted to the rear and that during the passage the vertical load on the limbs increases in relation to the accentuated vertical movement of the centre of mass.
Back and limb kinematics, vertical ground reaction force and time parameters of each limb were measured in 6 Grand Prix dressage horses performing on an instrumented treadmill at the trot and the passage. Horses were ridden by their own professional rider.
At the passage, horses moved at a slower speed (-43.2%), with a lower stride frequency (-23.6%) and, therefore, higher stride impulses (+31.0%). Relative stance duration of fore- and hindlimbs and suspension duration remained unchanged. While at the trot the diagonal limbs impacted almost simultaneously, the hindlimbs always impacted first at the passage; the time dissociation between landing and lift-off remained unchanged. Because of the prolonged stride duration, stride impulse and consequently limb impulses were higher at the passage in the fore- as well as in the hindlimbs (+24.8% and +39.9%, respectively). Within the diagonal limb pair, load was shifted from the forehand to the hindquarters (percentage stride impulse carried by the forehand -4.8%). Despite the higher impulses, peak vertical forces in the fore- and hindlimbs remained unchanged because of the prolonged absolute stance durations in fore- and hindlimbs (+28.1% and +32.2%, respectively).
Based on the intralimb timing, the passage closely resembles the trot. Compared to other head-neck positions, the higher degree of collection resulted in a pronounced shift in impulse towards the hindquarters. Despite the higher limb impulses, peak forces acting on the limbs were similar to those observed at the trot.
An understanding of load distribution between fore- and hindlimbs in relation to different riding techniques is crucial to prevent wear-and-tear on the locomotor apparatus.
在进行特定盛装舞步训练时,作用于四肢的负荷以及前肢与后肢之间的负荷分布缺乏客观评估。
马匹的收缩程度越高,负荷向后肢转移的就越多,且在慢步时,四肢上的垂直负荷会随着质心垂直运动的加剧而增加。
对6匹参加大奖赛的盛装舞步马在装有仪器的跑步机上进行快步和慢步训练时的背部和四肢运动学、垂直地面反作用力以及每个肢体的时间参数进行了测量。马匹由其各自的专业骑手骑乘。
在慢步时,马匹移动速度较慢(-43.2%),步频较低(-23.6%),因此步幅冲量较高(+31.0%)。前肢和后肢的相对站立持续时间以及悬空持续时间保持不变。在快步时,对角肢几乎同时着地,而后肢在慢步时总是先着地;着地和离地之间的时间间隔保持不变。由于步幅持续时间延长,前肢和后肢在慢步时的步幅冲量以及由此产生的肢体冲量都更高(分别为+24.8%和+39.9%)。在对角肢对中,负荷从前躯转移到了后躯(前躯承担的步幅冲量百分比 -4.8%)。尽管冲量较高,但由于前肢和后肢的绝对站立持续时间延长(分别为+28.1%和+32.2%),前肢和后肢的垂直力峰值保持不变。
基于肢体内部的时间安排,慢步与快步非常相似。与其他头颈姿势相比,更高程度的收缩导致冲量明显向后躯转移。尽管肢体冲量较高,但作用于四肢的峰值力与快步时观察到的相似。
了解不同骑乘技术下前肢与后肢之间的负荷分布对于预防运动器官的磨损至关重要。