Baum Ellen Z, Crespo-Carbone Steven M, Foleno Barbara D, Simon Lee D, Guillemont Jerome, Macielag Mark, Bush Karen
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C., 1000 Route 202, Raritan, NJ 08869, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 Aug;53(8):3240-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00166-09. Epub 2009 May 26.
MurF catalyzes the last cytoplasmic step of bacterial cell wall synthesis and is essential for bacterial survival. Our previous studies used a pharmacophore model of a MurF inhibitor to identify additional inhibitors with improved properties. We now present the characterization of two such inhibitors, the diarylquinolines DQ1 and DQ2. DQ1 inhibited Escherichia coli MurF (50% inhibitory concentration, 24 microM) and had modest activity (MICs, 8 to 16 microg/ml) against lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-defective E. coli and wild-type E. coli rendered permeable with polymyxin B nonapeptide. DQ2 additionally displayed activity against gram-positive bacteria (MICs, 8 to 16 microg/ml), including methicillin (meticillin)-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates and vancomycin-susceptible and -resistant Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium isolates. Treatment of LPS-defective E. coli cells with >or=2x MIC of DQ1 resulted in a 75-fold-greater accumulation of the MurF substrate compared to the control, a 70% decline in the amount of the MurF product, and eventual cell lysis, consistent with the inhibition of MurF within bacteria. DQ2 treatment of S. aureus resulted in similar effects on the MurF substrate and product quantities. At lower levels of DQ1 (<or=1x MIC), the level of accumulation of the substrate was less pronounced (15-fold greater compared to the amount for the control). However, a 50% increase in the amount of the MurF product compared to the control was reproducibly observed, consistent with the possible upregulation of muropeptide biosynthesis upon partial inhibition of this pathway. The overexpression of cloned MurF appeared to partly alleviate the DQ1-mediated inhibition of muropeptide synthesis. The identification of MurF inhibitors such as DQ1 and DQ2 that disrupt cell wall biosynthesis suggests that MurF remains a viable target for an antibacterial agent.
MurF催化细菌细胞壁合成的最后一个胞质步骤,对细菌存活至关重要。我们之前的研究使用MurF抑制剂的药效团模型来鉴定具有改进特性的其他抑制剂。我们现在展示两种此类抑制剂——二芳基喹啉DQ1和DQ2的特性。DQ1抑制大肠杆菌MurF(50%抑制浓度,24 microM),对脂多糖(LPS)缺陷型大肠杆菌和用多粘菌素B九肽使其通透的野生型大肠杆菌具有适度活性(最低抑菌浓度,8至16 microg/ml)。DQ2还对革兰氏阳性菌具有活性(最低抑菌浓度,8至16 microg/ml),包括对甲氧西林(美洛西林)敏感和耐药的金黄色葡萄球菌分离株以及对万古霉素敏感和耐药的粪肠球菌和屎肠球菌分离株。用≥2倍最低抑菌浓度的DQ1处理LPS缺陷型大肠杆菌细胞,与对照相比,MurF底物的积累增加了75倍,MurF产物的量下降了70%,最终导致细胞裂解,这与细菌内MurF的抑制作用一致。用DQ2处理金黄色葡萄球菌对MurF底物和产物量产生了类似影响。在较低水平的DQ1(≤1倍最低抑菌浓度)下,底物的积累水平不太明显(与对照相比增加了15倍)。然而,与对照相比,可重复观察到MurF产物的量增加了50%,这与该途径部分抑制后可能上调的胞壁肽生物合成一致。克隆的MurF的过表达似乎部分减轻了DQ1介导的胞壁肽合成抑制。鉴定出如DQ1和DQ2这样破坏细胞壁生物合成的MurF抑制剂表明,MurF仍然是抗菌剂的一个可行靶点。