Cahill Ronan A, Bembenek Andreas, Sirop Saad, Waterhouse Deirdre F, Schneider Wolfgang, Leroy Joel, Wiese David, Beutler Thomas, Bilchik Anton, Saha Sukamal, Schlag Peter M
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Aug;16(8):2170-80. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0510-9. Epub 2009 May 27.
The requirement for nodal analysis currently confounds the oncological propriety of focused purely endoscopic resection for early-stage colon cancer and complicates the evolution of innovative alternatives such as natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and its hybrids. Adjunctive sentinel node biopsy (SNB) deserves consideration as a means of addressing this shortfall.
Data from two prospectively maintained databases established for multicentric studies of SNB in colon cancer that employed similar methodologies were pooled to establish technique potency selectively in T1/T2 disease (both overall and under optimized conditions) and to project potential clinical impact.
Of 891 patients with T1-4, M0 intraperitoneal colon cancer, 225 had T1/T2 disease. Sentinel nodes were either not found or were falsely negative in 18 patients with T1/T2 cancers (8%) as compared with 17% (112/646) in those with T3/T4 disease (P = 0.001). Negative predictive value (NPV) in the former exceeded 95%, while sensitivity [including immunohistochemistry (IHC)] was 81%. In the 193 patients with T1/T2 disease recruited from those centers contributing >22 patients, sensitivity was 89% and NPV 97%. Thus, in this cohort, SNB could have correctly prompted localized resection (obviating en bloc mesenteric dissection) in 75% (144) of patients, including 59 with T1 lesions potentially amenable to intraluminal resection alone as their definitive treatment. Forty-four patients (23.4%) would still have conventional resection, leaving three patients (1.6% overall) understaged (11% false-negative rate).
These findings support the further investigation of SNB as oncological augment for localized resective techniques. Specific prospective study should pursue this goal.
目前对于区域淋巴结分析的要求使早期结肠癌单纯内镜下切除的肿瘤学合理性变得复杂,并使诸如经自然腔道内镜手术(NOTES)及其混合术式等创新替代方法的发展变得棘手。作为解决这一不足的手段,辅助前哨淋巴结活检(SNB)值得考虑。
将两个为结肠癌SNB多中心研究而建立的前瞻性维护数据库中的数据进行汇总,这些研究采用了相似的方法,以选择性地确定T1/T2期疾病(总体及优化条件下)的技术效能,并预测潜在的临床影响。
在891例T1-4、M0期腹腔内结肠癌患者中,225例为T1/T2期疾病。18例T1/T2期癌症患者(8%)未发现前哨淋巴结或前哨淋巴结为假阴性,而T3/T4期疾病患者中这一比例为17%(112/646)(P = 0.001)。前者的阴性预测值(NPV)超过95%,而敏感性[包括免疫组织化学(IHC)]为81%。在那些贡献患者数超过22例的中心招募的193例T1/T2期疾病患者中,敏感性为89%,NPV为97%。因此,在该队列中,SNB可以正确地促使75%(144例)患者进行局部切除(避免整块肠系膜清扫),其中包括59例T1期病变患者,这些患者可能仅通过腔内切除作为其确定性治疗方法。44例患者(23.4%)仍需进行传统切除,仅3例患者(总体的1.6%)分期过低(假阴性率为11%)。
这些发现支持进一步研究SNB作为局部切除技术的肿瘤学辅助手段。具体的前瞻性研究应朝着这一目标进行。