Suppr超能文献

麻风病神经功能损害诊断简化试验的评估:感觉运动筛查(SMS)研究

Evaluation of simplified tests for the diagnosis of nerve function impairment in leprosy: the Sensory Motor Screening (SMS) study.

作者信息

Van Veen Natasja H J, Roberts Anne E, Mahato Margaret E, Velema Johan P

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Lepr Rev. 2009 Mar;80(1):51-64.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Rapid and simple tests for diagnosing nerve function impairment (NFI) in leprosy are required in integrated settings. We examined whether simplified tests performed by newly trained general health workers (GHWs) have comparable diagnostic accuracy to the reference test conducted by experienced physiotherapists.

DESIGN

This multi-centre study from India and Bangladesh evaluated three simplified tests named: ILEP Learning Guide Two (M2), Indian dance (M3), and a questionnaire (M4) in 408 people affected by leprosy. Sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of the three tests were calculated using the full assessment (M1) as reference. Se and Sp were calculated at both whole body and individual nerve levels: whether any NFI and if single NFI (voluntary muscle testing of lid gap, eye closure, little finger out, thumb up and foot up, sensory testing of hands and of feet) was present.

RESULTS

M2 had 83% Se and 69% Sp, M3 had 76% Se and 84% Sp and M4 had 85% Se and 46% Sp in diagnosing any NFI. At the level of single NFI, M2 was most or similarly accurate in diagnosing single NFIs with highest prevalence (ST feet, ST hands, little finger out, thumb up), compared to M3 and M4.

CONCLUSIONS

ILEP Learning Guide Two (M2) and Indian dance (M3) were found to be the most accurate simplified tests for diagnosing the presence of NFI compared to the reference. M2 was the most useful test, because of greatest accuracy for most of the common types of NFI and inclusion of sensory testing of the hands. M2 is considered to be a useful tool in the hands of GHWs with time constraints in integrated settings.

摘要

目的

在综合医疗环境中,需要快速且简便的检测方法来诊断麻风病患者的神经功能损害(NFI)。我们研究了由新培训的普通卫生工作者(GHW)进行的简化检测,其诊断准确性是否与经验丰富的物理治疗师进行的参考检测相当。

设计

这项来自印度和孟加拉国的多中心研究,对408名麻风病患者评估了三项简化检测,分别为:ILEP学习指南二(M2)、印度舞蹈(M3)和一份问卷(M4)。以全面评估(M1)为参考,计算这三项检测的敏感性(Se)和特异性(Sp)。Se和Sp在全身及单个神经水平进行计算:即是否存在任何NFI以及是否存在单个NFI(睑裂、闭眼、小指外展、拇指上抬和足背屈的随意肌测试,手部和足部的感觉测试)。

结果

在诊断任何NFI时,M2的敏感性为83%,特异性为69%;M3的敏感性为76%,特异性为84%;M4的敏感性为85%,特异性为46%。在单个NFI水平上,与M3和M4相比,M2在诊断患病率最高的单个NFI(手足浅感觉、小指外展、拇指上抬)时,准确性最高或与之相当。

结论

与参考检测相比,ILEP学习指南二(M2)和印度舞蹈(M3)被发现是诊断NFI存在的最准确简化检测方法。M2是最有用的检测方法,因为它对大多数常见类型的NFI具有最高的准确性,并且包括了手部感觉测试。在综合医疗环境中,对于时间有限的GHW而言,M2被认为是一种有用的工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验