Zhang Quan-Guo, Buckling Angus, Ellis Richard J, Godfray H Charles J
Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Evolution. 2009 Sep;63(9):2248-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00708.x. Epub 2009 Apr 9.
In many circumstances organisms invest in cooperative activities to increase their mutual fitness but are susceptible to cheats that obtain the benefits of cooperation without investment. Natural selection may favor cooperators that resist cheats, and cheats that avoid such resistance; in theory the coevolutionary interaction may be sustained and dynamic. Here, we report evidence of antagonistic coevolution between cooperators and cheats involved in biofilm formation by Pseudomonas fluorescens bacteria. Two distinct phenotypes occur in static culture tubes: one that can form a biofilm at the air-broth interface and thus obtain improved access to oxygen, and one that colonizes the broth phase but which can also invade, and weaken, the biofilm produced by the other type. Over serial passage, biofilm producers (considered here as cooperators) evolve to become better at resisting invasion, and biofilm nonproducers (cheats) evolve to be more efficient invaders. Each type has higher performance (resistance in the case of cooperators and biofilm invasion for cheats) in competition with isolates of the other type from their past compared to that from their future, indicating a dynamic coevolutionary interaction. Such coevolution may have important consequences for the maintenance of cooperation.
在许多情况下,生物体通过合作活动来提高彼此的适应性,但容易受到不付出代价却获取合作利益的欺骗者的影响。自然选择可能会青睐抵抗欺骗者的合作者,以及避免这种抵抗的欺骗者;理论上,这种协同进化的相互作用可能是持续且动态的。在此,我们报告了荧光假单胞菌形成生物膜过程中合作者与欺骗者之间对抗性协同进化的证据。在静止培养管中出现两种不同的表型:一种能在气液界面形成生物膜,从而获得更好的氧气供应;另一种定殖于液相,但也能侵入并削弱另一种类型产生的生物膜。经过连续传代,生物膜生产者(在此被视为合作者)进化出更强的抵抗入侵能力,而不产生生物膜者(欺骗者)进化出更高效的入侵能力。与来自未来的另一种类型的分离株相比,每种类型在与来自过去的另一种类型的分离株竞争时都具有更高的表现(合作者表现为抗性,欺骗者表现为生物膜入侵能力),这表明存在动态的协同进化相互作用。这种协同进化可能对合作的维持产生重要影响。