Bruce John B, Cooper Guy A, Chabas Hélène, West Stuart A, Griffin Ashleigh S
Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
CEFE UMR 5175, CNRS-Université de Montpellier, Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier, Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
Evolution. 2017 Oct;71(10):2484-2495. doi: 10.1111/evo.13328. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
Bacteria perform cooperative behaviors that are exploitable by noncooperative cheats, and cheats frequently arise and coexist with cooperators in laboratory microcosms. However, evidence of competitive dynamics between cooperators and cheats in nature remains limited. Using the production of pyoverdine, an iron-scavenging molecule, and natural soil populations of Pseudomonas fluorescens, we found that (1) nonproducers are present in the population; (2) they co-occur (<1cm ) with pyoverdine producers; (3) they retain functional pyoverdine receptors; and (4) they can use the pyoverdine of on average 52% of producers. This suggests nonproducers can potentially act as social cheats in soil: utilizing the pyoverdine of others while producing little or none themselves. However, we found considerable variation in the extent to which nonproducers can exploit producers, as some isolates appear to produce exclusive forms of pyoverdine or kill nonproducers with toxins. We examined the consequences of this variation using theoretical modeling. We found variance in exploitability leads to some cheats gaining increased fitness benefits and others decreased benefits. However, the absolute gain in fitness from high exploitation is lower than the drop in fitness from low exploitation, decreasing the mean fitness of cheats and subsequently lowering the proportion of cheats maintained in the population. Our results suggest that although cooperator-cheat dynamics can occur in soil, a range of mechanisms can prevent nonproducers from exploiting producers.
细菌会表现出可被非合作型作弊者利用的合作行为,而且在实验室微观环境中,作弊者经常出现并与合作者共存。然而,自然界中合作者与作弊者之间竞争动态的证据仍然有限。利用荧光假单胞菌产生的一种铁载体分子——绿脓菌素以及自然土壤菌群,我们发现:(1)群体中存在不产生绿脓菌素的个体;(2)它们与绿脓菌素产生者共现(距离<1厘米);(3)它们保留了功能性绿脓菌素受体;(4)它们能够利用平均52%的产生者所产生的绿脓菌素。这表明不产生绿脓菌素的个体可能在土壤中充当社会作弊者:自己很少产生或不产生绿脓菌素,却利用其他个体产生的绿脓菌素。然而,我们发现不产生绿脓菌素的个体利用产生者的程度存在很大差异,因为一些分离株似乎会产生独特形式的绿脓菌素,或者用毒素杀死不产生绿脓菌素的个体。我们通过理论建模研究了这种差异的后果。我们发现可利用性的差异导致一些作弊者获得了更多的适应性益处,而另一些则减少了益处。然而,高利用度带来的适应性绝对增益低于低利用度导致的适应性下降,这降低了作弊者的平均适应性,进而降低了群体中作弊者的维持比例。我们的结果表明,虽然合作者与作弊者的动态关系可能在土壤中发生,但一系列机制可以阻止不产生绿脓菌素的个体利用产生者。