Buckley Lorrene A, Dorato Michael A
Eli Lilly & Co., Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2009 Aug;54(3):301-7. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2009.05.015. Epub 2009 May 27.
The choice of an appropriate high dose for nonclinical toxicology studies continues to generate significant discussion and debate. Typically, use of the term "high dose" reflects a consideration of a Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) or a Maximum Feasible Dose (MFD), inexact terms applied to the design of nonclinical studies conducted to support human clinical trials for experimental new drugs. A pharmaceutical industry perspective on appropriate considerations for high doses in nonclinical studies is provided herein, however, the basic principles applied to the design of toxicology studies translate across the areas of Regulatory, Academic, and Industrial toxicology. Dose selection approaches for nonclinical studies of safety assessment for pharmaceuticals should consider the need to demonstrate the full range of the dose-response continuum (e.g., NOAEL through a toxic dose), however, should also take into account relevance to human therapeutic doses and incorporate clinical indication- and phase-specific considerations.
在非临床毒理学研究中选择合适的高剂量持续引发大量讨论和争议。通常,“高剂量”一词的使用反映了对最大耐受剂量(MTD)或最大可行剂量(MFD)的考量,这两个术语并不精确,适用于为支持实验性新药的人体临床试验而开展的非临床研究设计。本文提供了制药行业对非临床研究中高剂量适当考量的观点,然而,应用于毒理学研究设计的基本原则在监管毒理学、学术毒理学和工业毒理学领域是相通的。药物安全性评估非临床研究的剂量选择方法应考虑证明剂量反应连续体的全范围(例如,从无观察到有害作用水平直至毒性剂量)的必要性,然而,也应考虑与人体治疗剂量的相关性,并纳入临床适应证和阶段特异性考量。