• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

供体风险指数对丙型肝炎病毒阳性肝移植受者结局的影响。

Impact of the donor risk index on the outcome of hepatitis C virus-positive liver transplant recipients.

作者信息

Maluf Daniel G, Edwards Erick B, Stravitz R Todd, Kauffman H Myron

机构信息

Division of Transplantation Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298-0248, USA.

出版信息

Liver Transpl. 2009 Jun;15(6):592-9. doi: 10.1002/lt.21699.

DOI:10.1002/lt.21699
PMID:19479802
Abstract

We have investigated the impact of the donor risk index (DRI) on the outcome of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients undergoing liver transplantation (LTx). Retrospective analysis was performed from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database (January 1, 2000 to June, 2006). The DRI was calculated as described by Feng et al. (Am J Transplant 2006;6:783-790). Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) exceptions were excluded from the analysis. Relative risk (RR) estimates of patient and graft loss were derived from Cox regression models. The Wald test was used to test the effect of the MELD score at transplant on the HCV-DRI interaction. Of the LTx recipients (16,678), 76.1% were Caucasian, and 66.7% were male; the median age was 52 (range, 18-80 years), and the mean follow-up time was 1148 days (range, 0-2959 days). Forty-six percent (n = 7675) of LTx recipients were HCV(+). The median DRI was 1.3 (range, 0.77-4.27). Increasing DRI was associated with a statistically significant increase in the RR of graft failure and patient death for both HCV(+) and HCV(-) recipients. However, HCV(+) recipients demonstrated a significantly higher increase in the RR of patient and graft loss as a function of the DRI than HCV(-) subjects, even after adjustments for several recipient factors, including MELD. In conclusion, a synergistic interaction between donor DRI and recipient HCV status exists, such that an allograft from a high-DRI donor more adversely affects the outcome of an HCV(+) recipient than that of an HCV(-) recipient.

摘要

我们研究了供体风险指数(DRI)对接受肝移植(LTx)的丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染患者预后的影响。从器官获取与移植网络数据库(2000年1月1日至2006年6月)进行回顾性分析。按照Feng等人所述方法计算DRI(《美国移植杂志》2006年;6:783 - 790)。分析排除了终末期肝病模型(MELD)例外情况。患者和移植物丢失的相对风险(RR)估计值来自Cox回归模型。采用Wald检验来检验移植时MELD评分对HCV - DRI相互作用的影响。在LTx受者(16,678例)中,76.1%为白种人,66.7%为男性;中位年龄为52岁(范围18 - 80岁),平均随访时间为1148天(范围0 - 2959天)。46%(n = 7675)的LTx受者HCV呈阳性。DRI中位数为1.3(范围0.77 - 4.27)。对于HCV阳性和HCV阴性受者,DRI升高均与移植物失败和患者死亡的RR在统计学上显著增加相关。然而,即使在对包括MELD在内的多个受者因素进行调整后,HCV阳性受者的患者和移植物丢失RR随DRI的增加幅度仍显著高于HCV阴性受者。总之,供体DRI与受者HCV状态之间存在协同相互作用,即来自高DRI供体的同种异体移植物对HCV阳性受者预后的不利影响比对HCV阴性受者更大。

相似文献

1
Impact of the donor risk index on the outcome of hepatitis C virus-positive liver transplant recipients.供体风险指数对丙型肝炎病毒阳性肝移植受者结局的影响。
Liver Transpl. 2009 Jun;15(6):592-9. doi: 10.1002/lt.21699.
2
Utilization of extended donor criteria liver allograft: Is the elevated risk of failure independent of the model for end-stage liver disease score of the recipient?扩大标准供体肝移植的应用:移植失败风险升高是否独立于受者的终末期肝病模型评分?
Transplantation. 2006 Dec 27;82(12):1653-7. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000250571.41361.21.
3
Donor livers with steatosis are safe to use in hepatitis C virus-positive recipients.脂肪变性的供体肝脏用于丙型肝炎病毒阳性受者是安全的。
Liver Transpl. 2009 Jun;15(6):619-28. doi: 10.1002/lt.21761.
4
Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score does not predict patient or graft survival in living donor liver transplant recipients.终末期肝病模型评分不能预测活体肝移植受者的患者或移植物存活率。
Liver Transpl. 2003 Jul;9(7):737-40. doi: 10.1053/jlts.2003.50122.
5
Elderly donors for HCV(+) versus non-HCV recipients: patient survival following liver transplantation.丙型肝炎病毒阳性(HCV(+))供体与非丙型肝炎病毒受体的老年供体:肝移植后的患者生存率
Transplant Proc. 2008 Apr;40(3):792-6. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.02.069.
6
Impact of donor age on survival and fibrosis progression in patients with hepatitis C undergoing liver transplantation using HCV+ allografts.供体年龄对接受丙型肝炎病毒阳性同种异体肝移植的丙型肝炎患者生存及纤维化进展的影响。
Liver Transpl. 2006 Oct;12(10):1496-503. doi: 10.1002/lt.20849.
7
Should a lower quality organ go to the least sick patient? Model for end-stage liver disease score and donor risk index as predictors of early allograft dysfunction.质量较低的器官应该给病情最轻的患者吗?终末期肝病评分和供体风险指数作为早期移植肝功能障碍预测指标的模型。
Transplant Proc. 2012 Jun;44(5):1303-6. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.01.115.
8
Improved outcome of adult recipients with a high model for end-stage liver disease score and a small-for-size graft.终末期肝病模型评分高且移植物过小的成年受者的预后改善。
Liver Transpl. 2009 May;15(5):496-503. doi: 10.1002/lt.21606.
9
Outcome of liver transplantation for recipients with hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus coinfection: analysis of the UNOS data.肝移植治疗乙型肝炎和丙型肝炎病毒合并感染受者的结果:UNOS 数据分析。
Transplantation. 2011 Oct 15;92(7):809-14. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31822d4dc3.
10
Liver Match, a prospective observational cohort study on liver transplantation in Italy: study design and current practice of donor-recipient matching.Liver Match,一项关于意大利肝移植的前瞻性观察队列研究:研究设计和供受者匹配的当前实践。
Dig Liver Dis. 2011 Feb;43(2):155-64. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2010.11.002. Epub 2010 Dec 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Retrospective Analysis of the Impact of High- and Low-Quality Donor Livers for Patients with High-Acuity Illness.回顾性分析高质量和低质量供肝对急性危重症患者的影响。
Ann Transplant. 2024 Jan 9;29:e941931. doi: 10.12659/AOT.941931.
2
The utility of machine learning for predicting donor discard in abdominal transplantation.机器学习在预测腹部移植中供者淘汰的应用。
Clin Transplant. 2023 May;37(5):e14951. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14951. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
3
Hepatitis C viral infection after liver transplantation.肝移植后的丙型肝炎病毒感染
Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2012 Jul 23;1(3):73-76. doi: 10.1002/cld.62. eCollection 2012 Jul.
4
High Center Volume Does Not Mitigate Risk Associated with Using High Donor Risk Organs in Liver Transplantation.高中心容量并不能减轻肝移植中使用高供体风险器官相关的风险。
Dig Dis Sci. 2017 Sep;62(9):2578-2585. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4639-2. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
5
Factors Associated With Short- and Long-term Liver Graft Survival in the United Kingdom: Development of a UK Donor Liver Index.英国肝脏移植短期和长期存活的相关因素:英国供肝指数的制定
Transplantation. 2017 Apr;101(4):786-792. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001576.
6
The role of extended criteria donors in liver transplantation for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.扩大标准供体在非酒精性脂肪性肝炎肝移植中的作用。
Surgery. 2016 Dec;160(6):1533-1543. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.06.051. Epub 2016 Aug 21.
7
Donor Factors Including Donor Risk Index Predict Fibrosis Progression, Allograft Loss, and Patient Survival following Liver Transplantation for Hepatitis C Virus.包括供体风险指数在内的供体因素可预测丙型肝炎病毒肝移植后的纤维化进展、移植物丢失和患者生存情况。
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2016 Jun;6(2):109-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
8
Key donor factors associated with graft loss among liver transplant recipients with human immunodeficiency virus.与感染人类免疫缺陷病毒的肝移植受者移植物丢失相关的关键供体因素。
Clin Transplant. 2016 Sep;30(9):1140-5. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12800. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
9
Post-liver transplant hepatitis C virus recurrence: an unresolved thorny problem.肝移植后丙型肝炎病毒复发:一个尚未解决的棘手问题。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Aug 28;20(32):11095-115. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i32.11095.
10
Donor Risk Index for African American liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C virus.非裔美国丙型肝炎病毒肝移植受者的供者风险指数。
Hepatology. 2013 Oct;58(4):1263-9. doi: 10.1002/hep.26478. Epub 2013 Aug 6.