Ferreira Rui, Pereira Andreia, Rossi Renata, Teixeira Ana, Nunes Manuela, Menezes Isabel, Anjos Rui, Martins Fernando Maymone
Serviço de Cardiologia Pediátrica, Hospital de Santa Cruz, Carnaxide, Portugal.
Rev Port Cardiol. 2009 Mar;28(3):291-301.
Closure of ventricular septal defects (VSDs) with significant shunt is indicated due to the risks associated with increased pulmonary flow leading to left chamber dilatation, the possibility of cardiac dysfunction and arrhythmias, and the risk of bacterial endocarditis. Percutaneous VSD closure is an effective and safe alternative to surgery in selected patients. However, perimembranous VSD (PMVSD) constitutes a special case since the technique for percutaneous closure is more complex and hence warrants individual evaluation.
To assess the efficacy and safety of percutaneous closure of PMVSD based on the initial experience of our center, the first to use this technique in Portugal.
Five patients, aged between 5 and 23 years, with PMVSD of a suitable size for percutaneous closure, were selected since they showed evidence of a significant left-to-right shunt together with left chamber dilatation. The procedure was performed under general anesthesia, guided by fluoroscopy and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). A femoro-femoral arteriovenous loop was established and an Amplatzer occluder implanted, the characteristics and dimensions of which were chosen according to the angiographic and TEE findings. Besides therapeutic efficacy and complications during the procedure and follow-up, left ventricular dimensions and function and degree of mitral, aortic and tricuspid regurgitation were also assessed pre- and post-procedure, during a follow-up of 5 to 23 months.
All patients had a Qp:Qs ratio of > 2:1. In one case, the procedure was abandoned as the VSD diameter was over 17 mm, and the patient was referred for surgical closure. In the other four patients, two membranous (8 and 16 mm) and two muscular (6 and 12 mm) VSD occluders were used. On final angiographic assessment, no residual shunt was observed in any patient. One patient presented a transient junctional rhythm during the procedure. During follow-up, there was no prolongation of the PQ interval or de novo aortic regurgitation in any patient. Catheterization time ranged between 90 and 176 minutes and fluoroscopy time between 10 and 17 minutes.
由于存在与肺血流量增加相关的风险,包括导致左心室扩张、心脏功能障碍和心律失常的可能性以及细菌性心内膜炎的风险,因此对于有明显分流的室间隔缺损(VSD)进行封堵是必要的。对于部分患者,经皮封堵VSD是一种有效且安全的手术替代方案。然而,膜周部室间隔缺损(PMVSD)是一种特殊情况,因为经皮封堵技术更为复杂,因此需要进行个体化评估。
基于我们中心(葡萄牙首个使用该技术)的初步经验,评估经皮封堵PMVSD的疗效和安全性。
选择了5例年龄在5至23岁之间、PMVSD大小适合经皮封堵的患者,因为他们显示出明显的左向右分流以及左心室扩张的证据。手术在全身麻醉下进行,由荧光透视和经食管超声心动图(TEE)引导。建立股-股动静脉环路并植入Amplatzer封堵器,其特性和尺寸根据血管造影和TEE结果选择。除了手术过程中和随访期间的治疗效果和并发症外,还在术前、术后以及5至23个月的随访期间评估了左心室大小和功能以及二尖瓣、主动脉瓣和三尖瓣反流程度。
所有患者的Qp:Qs比值均>2:1。1例患者因VSD直径超过17mm而放弃手术,该患者被转至外科进行封堵。在其他4例患者中,使用了2个膜周部(8mm和16mm)和2个肌部(6mm和12mm)VSD封堵器。在最终血管造影评估中,未观察到任何患者有残余分流。1例患者在手术过程中出现短暂的交界性心律。在随访期间,任何患者均未出现PQ间期延长或新发主动脉瓣反流。导管插入时间在90至176分钟之间,荧光透视时间在10至17分钟之间。
1)经皮封堵PMVSD对于部分患者是一种有效且安全的治疗方法。2)这是一个复杂的手术,但在具备适当资质的中心可能会得到改进并应用于更多患者。