Triggle David J
School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, State University of New York, 126 Cooke, SUNY at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260-1608, USA.
Biochem Pharmacol. 2009 Aug 1;78(3):217-23. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2009.02.015. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
Chemical space whether defined by small molecules or large proteins is larger than can be usefully explored. One of the challenges of drug discovery is thus the definition of the overlap between chemical space, biologically useful space and pharmacological space and how this may be employed in the discovery of new small molecule drugs. Despite the decrease in drug discovery productivity in recent years there is no shortage of targets for small molecule intervention, including stroke, pain, neurodegenerative diseases, inflammation and bacterial and viral infections. Only an extremely small fraction of available chemical space has thus far been explored and it is likely that prior synthetic constraints and bias to existing frameworks and scaffolds have contributed to this. Several approaches are being employed to explore more fruitful paths to discovery. These include recognition that existing therapeutic entities already occupy validated pharmacological space and thus are good leads, the use of molecular fragments that permits a broader exploration of chemical space, and the role of templates that permit fragments to combine to generate active species. Finally, a new focus on natural product-like scaffolds from both synthetic methodologies and the genetic reengineering of biosynthetic pathways is likely to prove valuable. However the exploration of chemical space will alone not solve the current deficit in drug discovery productivity. It is necessary to recognize that cellular environments are not the dilute homogeneous solutions of many screening systems and that a more integrated systems approach will serve to maximize any success of chemical space exploration.
化学空间,无论由小分子还是大蛋白质定义,都超出了可有效探索的范围。因此,药物发现的挑战之一在于定义化学空间、生物学有用空间和药理学空间之间的重叠,以及如何将其应用于新小分子药物的发现。尽管近年来药物发现的生产力有所下降,但小分子干预的靶点并不匮乏,包括中风、疼痛、神经退行性疾病、炎症以及细菌和病毒感染。到目前为止,仅探索了可用化学空间的极小一部分,这可能是由于先前的合成限制以及对现有框架和支架的偏向性造成的。目前正在采用多种方法来探索更有效的发现途径。这些方法包括认识到现有治疗实体已经占据了经过验证的药理学空间,因此是很好的先导物;使用分子片段以更广泛地探索化学空间;以及模板的作用,即允许片段组合以产生活性物质。最后,从合成方法和生物合成途径的基因改造两方面对类天然产物支架的新关注可能会被证明是有价值的。然而,仅探索化学空间并不能解决当前药物发现生产力的不足。必须认识到细胞环境并非许多筛选系统中的稀溶液,更综合的系统方法将有助于最大化化学空间探索的任何成功。