Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich Grosshadern, Ludwig Maximilians University, D 81377 Munich, Germany.
Eur Urol. 2010 Apr;57(4):693-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.05.031. Epub 2009 May 26.
Laser vaporisation of the prostate has had a considerable impact in recent years. In an attempt to achieve tissue vaporisation with bipolar high-frequency generators, plasma vaporisation was recently introduced.
To provide the first clinical information on bipolar plasma vaporisation of the prostate for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to bladder outlet obstruction (BOO).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Thirty patients were included in this prospective bicentre study.
All patients underwent bipolar plasma vaporisation with a novel electrode (Olympus Winter & Ibe GmbH, Hamburg, Germany).
International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), bother score, maximum flow rate (Q(max)), and postvoid residual were evaluated at baseline and at the time of discharge as well as at 1, 3, and 6 mo after the intervention.
Mean preoperative prostate volume was 59±32 ml (range: 30-170), and mean operating time was 61±26 min (range: 20-140). Besides one reoperation (conventional transurethral prostatectomy) due to persistent obstruction, no major complication occurred intra- or postoperatively and no blood transfusion was required. Catheterisation time averaged 41±35 h (range: 18-192). Transient mild to moderate dysuria was noted in four patients (13%). At 1, 3, and 6 mo, Q(max) increased from 6.6±2.7 ml/s preoperative to 17.3±4.7 ml/s (p<0.01), 18.5±4.6 ml/s (p<0.01), and 18.1±5.0 ml/s (p<0.01), respectively. The IPSS decreased from 20.8±3.6 to 10.4±3.5 (p<0.01), 8.2±2.9 (p<0.01), and 8.1±3.1 (p<0.01), respectively. These data represent a small nonrandomised study cohort with limited follow-up.
Our initial experience indicates that bipolar plasma vaporisation might be a safe and effective treatment option for patients with LUTS due to BOO. To define the potential role of this novel technique, randomised trials with longer follow-up are mandatory.
近年来,前列腺激光汽化术有了很大的发展。为了实现双极高频发生器的组织汽化,最近引入了等离子体汽化。
为因膀胱出口梗阻(BOO)而出现下尿路症状(LUTS)的患者提供双极等离子体前列腺汽化的初步临床信息。
设计、地点和参与者:这项前瞻性的双中心研究纳入了 30 名患者。
所有患者均接受了一种新型电极(奥林巴斯 Winter & Ibe GmbH,德国汉堡)的双极等离子体汽化治疗。
国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、困扰评分、最大尿流率(Qmax)和残余尿量在基线和出院时以及干预后 1、3 和 6 个月进行评估。
术前前列腺体积平均为 59±32ml(范围:30-170),手术时间平均为 61±26min(范围:20-140)。除了 1 例因持续梗阻而再次手术(传统经尿道前列腺切除术)外,术中或术后均无重大并发症发生,也无需输血。导尿管留置时间平均为 41±35h(范围:18-192)。4 名患者(13%)出现短暂的轻度至中度尿痛。在 1、3 和 6 个月时,Qmax 从术前的 6.6±2.7ml/s 增加到 17.3±4.7ml/s(p<0.01)、18.5±4.6ml/s(p<0.01)和 18.1±5.0ml/s(p<0.01)。IPSS 从 20.8±3.6 降至 10.4±3.5(p<0.01)、8.2±2.9(p<0.01)和 8.1±3.1(p<0.01)。这些数据代表了一个随访时间有限的小的非随机研究队列。
我们的初步经验表明,双极等离子体汽化术可能是治疗因 BOO 而出现 LUTS 的患者的一种安全有效的治疗选择。为了确定这项新技术的潜在作用,需要进行具有更长随访时间的随机试验。