Bender Genevieve, Hummel Thomas, Negoias Simona, Small Dana M
John B. Pierce Laboratory, New Haven, CT 06519, USA.
Behav Neurosci. 2009 Jun;123(3):481-9. doi: 10.1037/a0015065.
There is a controversy concerning whether smelling via the nose (ortho-nasally) or the mouth (retro-nasally) represent two routes to the same modality or two distinct submodalities. Since olfactory coding is dependent upon experience, and since food odors are experienced retro-nasally, the authors tested the hypothesis that whether an odor represents a food may influence whether sensation via the two routes leads to separable responses. The authors demonstrate that salivary response to food odors decrease with repeated presentation and show that this response rebounds upon presentation of a novel food odor via the same route and upon presentation of the same food odor via a novel route. This finding indicates that the novel odor and the novel route represent distinct sensory signals. This effect is specific, in that it does not depend on differences in odor intensity or pleasantness and is selective, in that it occurs for food odors but not for equally pleasant and intense nonfood odors. These results demonstrate that separable signals are generated for the same food odor depending upon route and support the existence of category-specific processing.
关于通过鼻子(经鼻)或嘴巴(经口)闻气味是代表通向同一感觉方式的两条途径还是两种不同的子感觉方式,存在争议。由于嗅觉编码依赖于经验,且食物气味是经口体验到的,作者们测试了这样一个假设:一种气味是否代表食物可能会影响通过这两条途径产生的感觉是否会导致可分离的反应。作者们证明,对食物气味的唾液反应会随着重复呈现而降低,并表明这种反应会在通过相同途径呈现新的食物气味以及通过新途径呈现相同的食物气味时出现反弹。这一发现表明,新气味和新途径代表着不同的感官信号。这种效应是特定的,因为它不依赖于气味强度或愉悦度的差异;它也是有选择性的,因为它只在食物气味的情况下出现,而在同样愉悦且强烈的非食物气味情况下则不会出现。这些结果表明,对于相同的食物气味,根据途径会产生可分离的信号,并支持了类别特异性加工的存在。