Kenning Tyler J, Gandhi Ravi H, German John W
Division of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York 12208, USA.
Neurosurg Focus. 2009 Jun;26(6):E6. doi: 10.3171/2009.4.FOCUS0960.
Hinge craniotomy (HC) has recently been described as an alternative to decompressive craniectomy (DC). Although HC may obviate the need for cranial reconstruction, an analysis comparing HC to DC has not yet been published.
A retrospective review was conducted of 50 patients who underwent cranial decompression (20 with HC, 30 with DC). Baseline demographics, neurological examination results, and underlying pathology were reviewed. Clinical outcome was assessed by length of ventilatory support, length of intensive care unit stay, and survival at discharge. Control of intracranial hypertension was assessed by average daily intracranial pressure (ICP) for the duration of ICP monitoring and an ICP therapeutic intensity index. Radiographic outcomes were assessed by comparing preoperative and postoperative CT scans for: 1) Rotterdam score; 2) postoperative volume of cerebral expansion; 3) presence of uncal herniation; 4) intracerebral hemorrhage; and 5) extraaxial hematoma. Postoperative CT scans were analyzed for the size of the craniotomy/craniectomy and magnitude of extracranial herniation.
No significant differences were identified in baseline demographics, neurological examination results, or Rotterdam score between the HC and DC groups. Both HC and DC resulted in adequate control of ICP, as reflected in the average ICP for each group of patients (HC = 12.0 +/- 5.6 mm Hg, DC = 12.7 +/- 4.4 mm Hg; p > 0.05) at the same average therapeutic intensity index (HC = 1.2 +/- 0.3, DC = 1.2 +/- 0.4; p > 0.05). The need for reoperation (3 [15%] of 20 patients in the HC group, 3 [10%] of 30 patients in the DC group; p > 0.05), hospital survival (15 [75%] of 20 in the HC group, 21 [70%] of 30 in the DC group; p > 0.05), and mean duration of both mechanical ventilation (9.0 +/- 7.2 days in the HC group, 11.7 +/- 12.0 days in the DC group; p > 0.05) and intensive care unit stay (11.6 +/- 7.7 days in the HC group, 15.6 +/- 15.3 days in the DC group; p > 0.05) were similar. The difference in operative time for the two procedures was not statistically significant (130.4 +/- 71.9 minutes in the HC group, 124.9 +/- 63.3 minutes in the DC group; p > 0.05). The size of the cranial defect was comparable between the 2 groups. Postoperative imaging characteristics, including Rotterdam score, also did not differ significantly. Although a smaller volume of cerebral expansion was associated with HC (77.5 +/- 54.1 ml) than DC (105.1 +/- 65.1 ml), this difference was not statistically significant.
Hinge craniotomy appears to be at least as good as DC in providing postoperative ICP control and results in equivalent early clinical outcomes.
最近有研究报道了一种开颅减压术(HC)作为去骨瓣减压术(DC)的替代方法。尽管HC可能无需进行颅骨重建,但尚未有关于HC与DC对比分析的文献发表。
回顾性分析50例行颅骨减压术的患者(20例行HC,30例行DC)。对患者的基线人口统计学资料、神经学检查结果及潜在病理情况进行评估。通过通气支持时间、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间及出院生存率评估临床疗效。通过ICP监测期间的平均每日颅内压(ICP)及ICP治疗强度指数评估颅内高压的控制情况。通过比较术前及术后CT扫描评估影像学结果,包括:1)鹿特丹评分;2)术后脑膨出体积;3)钩回疝的存在情况;4)脑出血;5)轴外血肿。分析术后CT扫描结果,评估开颅/去骨瓣大小及颅外疝的程度。
HC组与DC组在基线人口统计学资料、神经学检查结果或鹿特丹评分方面未发现显著差异。HC和DC均能有效控制ICP,两组患者的平均ICP(HC = 12.0 +/- 5.6 mmHg,DC = 12.7 +/- 4.4 mmHg;p > 0.05)及平均治疗强度指数(HC = 1.2 +/- 0.3,DC = 1.2 +/- 0.4;p > 0.05)相近。再次手术的需求(HC组20例中有3例[15%],DC组30例中有3例[10%];p > 0.05)、住院生存率(HC组20例中有15例[75%],DC组30例中有21例[70%];p > 0.05)以及机械通气平均时长(HC组为9.0 +/- 7.2天,DC组为11.7 +/- 12.0天;p > 0.05)和ICU住院平均时长(HC组为11.6 +/- 7.7天,DC组为15.6 +/- 15.3天;p > 0.05)均相似。两种手术的手术时间差异无统计学意义(HC组为130.4 +/- 71.9分钟,DC组为124.9 +/- 63.3分钟;p > 0.05)。两组颅骨缺损大小相当。术后影像学特征,包括鹿特丹评分,也无显著差异。尽管HC术后脑膨出体积(77.5 +/- 54.1 ml)小于DC(105.1 +/- 65.1 ml),但差异无统计学意义。
在术后ICP控制方面,开颅减压术似乎至少与去骨瓣减压术效果相当,且早期临床疗效相当。