Radmanesh Farid, Nejat Farideh, El Khashab Mostafa, Ghodsi Syed Mohammad, Ardebili Hasan Eftekhar
Department of Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital Medical Center, and Department of Biostatistics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2009 Jun;3(6):516-20. doi: 10.3171/2009.2.PEDS08476.
OBJECT There has been controversy over whether CSF shunt insertion simultaneously with repair of myelomeningocele (MMC) might increase shunt-related complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate shunt complication rates in patients who underwent concurrent MMC surgery and shunt placement and compare them to the rates in patients treated with shunt placement in a separate procedure. METHODS The authors retrospectively reviewed the outcome of shunt placement in 127 patients with MMC who were followed up for >or=1 year after shunt surgery. In 65 patients shunt surgery was performed in a second operation after MMC repair and in 46 the 2 procedures were performed concurrently. In 7 patients shunt placement was the initial surgery, and in 9 it was the only procedure performed. The patients were evaluated for shunt complications. RESULTS There was no statistically significant between-groups difference in age at which patients underwent shunt placement. The overall rates of shunt infection and shunt malfunction were 16.5 and 39.4%, respectively. There was a high rate of shunt infection and mortality in those patients treated with CSF shunting only. There was no statistically significant difference between complication rates in patients in whom the 2 procedures were performed concurrently and those who underwent separate operations. CONCLUSIONS The order in which myelomeningocele repair and shunt placement were carried out did not have a significant effect on the rate of shunt complications. Thus, when indicated these procedures can be performed concurrently with a level of risk comparable to that associated with delayed shunt placement.
关于在脊髓脊膜膨出(MMC)修复术同时进行脑脊液分流管置入是否会增加分流管相关并发症一直存在争议。本研究的目的是评估同时接受MMC手术和分流管置入的患者的分流管并发症发生率,并将其与在单独手术中接受分流管置入治疗的患者的发生率进行比较。方法:作者回顾性分析了127例MMC患者分流管置入的结果,这些患者在分流管手术后随访≥1年。65例患者在MMC修复术后的第二次手术中进行了分流管手术,46例患者同时进行了这两种手术。7例患者分流管置入是初次手术,9例患者这是唯一进行的手术。对患者进行分流管并发症评估。结果:患者接受分流管置入时的年龄在组间无统计学显著差异。分流管感染和分流管故障的总体发生率分别为16.5%和39.4%。仅接受脑脊液分流治疗的患者中分流管感染和死亡率较高。同时进行这两种手术的患者与接受单独手术的患者的并发症发生率之间无统计学显著差异。结论:脊髓脊膜膨出修复术和分流管置入的顺序对分流管并发症发生率没有显著影响。因此,在有指征时,这些手术可以同时进行,风险水平与延迟分流管置入相当。