Fahmy Nadia Z, El Guindy Jylan, Zamzam Mohamed
Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, October 6 University, Cairo, Egypt.
J Prosthodont. 2009 Jun;18(4):324-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00448.x. Epub 2009 Mar 26.
This study evaluated the effect of artificial saliva storage on the hardness, crack length, and fracture toughness of a glazed, polished, and bleached hydrothermal low-fusing glass-ceramic (Duceram LFC).
Forty ceramic discs were constructed. The discs were assigned to four groups (n = 10) according to their surface finish: Gp1 -- Autoglaze, Gp2 -- Autoglaze/ground/diamond-polished, Gp3 -- Overglaze, Gp4 -- Overglaze/ground/diamond-polished. Each group was further divided into two subgroups forming eight total subgroups (n = 5). Subgroup A was unbleached; Subgroup B was bleached. Testing was performed before and after 21 days of artificial saliva storage. Data were presented as means and standard deviation (SD). ANOVA was used, along with Duncan's post hoc test for pairwise comparison between the means when ANOVA test was found significant (p< or = 0.05).
Surface treatments such as glazing, polishing, and bleaching, saliva storage, and the interaction between these variables had a statistically significant effect on mean values of microhardness, crack length, and fracture toughness of the specimens. There was a statistically significant increase in microhardness and fracture toughness mean values, while crack length values decreased after saliva storage. Polished specimens recorded the smallest crack lengths and fracture toughness, and highest hardness values before and after saliva storage. No difference in fracture toughness values was evident between glazed and polished specimens. Mean crack lengths decreased after saliva storage in all the tested specimens. Hardness values increased after saliva storage. The autoglazed group showed significantly higher fracture toughness, lower crack length, and microhardness than the overglazed group.
Surface finishing procedures and artificial saliva storage had a statistically significant effect on mean values of microhardness, crack length, and fracture toughness. This in vitro study suggests that fracture toughness of ceramics may be affected by different surface treatments such as glazing, polishing, bleaching, or a combination; however, in this study Duceram LFC proved its self-healing property after 3-week storage in artificial saliva.
本研究评估了人工唾液储存对一种釉面、抛光和漂白的水热低熔微晶玻璃(Duceram LFC)的硬度、裂纹长度和断裂韧性的影响。
制作了40个陶瓷圆盘。根据表面处理方式将圆盘分为四组(n = 10):Gp1——自动上釉,Gp2——自动上釉/研磨/金刚石抛光,Gp3——釉上彩,Gp4——釉上彩/研磨/金刚石抛光。每组再进一步分为两个亚组,共形成八个亚组(n = 5)。A亚组未漂白;B亚组经过漂白。在人工唾液储存21天前后进行测试。数据以均值和标准差(SD)表示。使用方差分析(ANOVA),当方差分析测试结果显著(p≤0.05)时,采用邓肯事后检验进行均值间的两两比较。
釉面处理、抛光、漂白、唾液储存以及这些变量之间的相互作用对试样的显微硬度、裂纹长度和断裂韧性的均值有统计学显著影响。唾液储存后,显微硬度和断裂韧性均值有统计学显著增加,而裂纹长度值减小。抛光试样在唾液储存前后记录的裂纹长度最小、断裂韧性最低且硬度最高。釉面和抛光试样的断裂韧性值没有明显差异。所有测试试样在唾液储存后平均裂纹长度均减小。唾液储存后硬度值增加。自动上釉组的断裂韧性显著高于釉上彩组,裂纹长度和显微硬度则低于釉上彩组。
表面处理程序和人工唾液储存对显微硬度、裂纹长度和断裂韧性的均值有统计学显著影响。这项体外研究表明,陶瓷的断裂韧性可能会受到不同表面处理方式(如釉面处理、抛光、漂白或组合)的影响;然而,在本研究中,Duceram LFC在人工唾液中储存3周后证明了其自愈性能。