• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

米索前列醇经口腔与经阴道用于孕中期终止妊娠的比较。

Comparison of oral versus vaginal misoprostol for mid-trimester pregnancy termination.

作者信息

Khawaja Nuzhat Parveen, Rehman Rakhshanda

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecoloyg, Fatima Jinnah Medical College/Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Lahore.

出版信息

J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2009 Jun;19(6):359-62.

PMID:19486574
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of oral versus vaginal administration of misoprostol for second trimester pregnancy termination.

STUDY DESIGN

Interventional, quasi experimental study.

PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY

The Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit-II, Fatima Jinnah Medical College/Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Lahore, from August, 2003 to October, 2004.

METHODOLOGY

Sixty pregnant women at second trimester of gestation who were candidates for therapeutic termination of pregnancy were recruited for the study. Grandmultipara, women who had scarred uterus and history of hypersensitivity to prostaglandins were excluded. The subjects were assigned into two groups. Group 1 (n=30) had misoprostol orally, while the group 2 (n=30) received the drug by the vaginal route. Dosage regimen was similar in both groups that was 200 microg 4 hours apart till expulsion of fetus or maximum of upto 5 doses. Main outcome measures of the study were induction-expulsion interval, need for surgical evacuation and maternal complications.

RESULTS

The mean induction-expulsion interval in the group 1 and 2 was 11.8+/-8.3 and 12.8+/-8.5 hours respectively, which was not different statistically. The process of expulsion was complete in 53.3% of subjects in both groups by misoprostol only, while 36.6% required surgical evacuation in oral group versus 33.3% in vaginal group. The rate of failed induction in groups 1 and 2 was 10% and 13.3% respectively. There was no reported case of nausea, diarrhea, headache, dizziness, shivering, pyrexia and hyperstimulation in both the groups. However, a case of vomiting (3.3%) was observed in the vaginal group.

摘要

目的

比较米索前列醇口服与阴道给药用于中期妊娠终止的疗效和安全性。

研究设计

干预性、准实验性研究。

研究地点和时间

2003年8月至2004年10月,拉合尔市法蒂玛·真纳医学院/甘加·拉姆爵士医院妇产科第二单元。

方法

招募60名中期妊娠且适合治疗性终止妊娠的孕妇进行研究。排除多产妇、子宫有瘢痕及对前列腺素过敏史的妇女。将受试者分为两组。第1组(n = 30)口服米索前列醇,第2组(n = 30)经阴道给药。两组给药方案相似,即每4小时服用200微克,直至胎儿排出或最多服用5剂。本研究的主要观察指标为引产至排出间隔时间、手术清宫需求及母体并发症。

结果

第1组和第2组的平均引产至排出间隔时间分别为11.8±8.3小时和12.8±8.5小时,差异无统计学意义。两组中仅使用米索前列醇的情况下,53.3%的受试者排出过程完整,口服组36.6%需要手术清宫,阴道组为33.3%。第1组和第2组的引产失败率分别为10%和13.3%。两组均未报告恶心、腹泻、头痛、头晕、寒战、发热及过度刺激的病例。然而,阴道组观察到1例呕吐(3.3%)。

相似文献

1
Comparison of oral versus vaginal misoprostol for mid-trimester pregnancy termination.米索前列醇经口腔与经阴道用于孕中期终止妊娠的比较。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2009 Jun;19(6):359-62.
2
Therapeutic termination of second trimester pregnancies with low dose misoprostol.用低剂量米索前列醇治疗终止中期妊娠
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2006 Jul;16(7):464-7.
3
Vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin and vaginal PGE2 for second-trimester labor induction.米索前列醇阴道给药与缩宫素浓缩液及前列腺素E2阴道给药用于孕中期引产的比较
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jul;104(1):138-45. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000128947.31887.94.
4
[Oxytocin and misoprostol administered intravaginally for termination of pregnancy at 13 to 29 weeks of amenorrhea. A prospective randomized trial].[阴道内给予缩宫素和米索前列醇用于终止闭经13至29周妊娠。一项前瞻性随机试验]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2001 Sep;30(5):439-43.
5
Medical abortion in late second trimester--a comparative study with misoprostol through vaginal versus oral followed by vaginal route.孕中期晚期药物流产——米索前列醇经阴道与口服后经阴道途径的对比研究
J Indian Med Assoc. 2006 Feb;104(2):81-2, 84.
6
A comparative study on sublingual versus oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol for late first and early second trimester abortion.米索前列醇舌下含服、口服及阴道给药用于孕早期末和孕中期初流产的比较研究
J Indian Med Assoc. 2010 May;108(5):283-4, 286.
7
A prospective randomised comparison of sublingual and vaginal misoprostol in second trimester termination of pregnancy.孕中期终止妊娠时舌下含服与阴道用米索前列醇的前瞻性随机对照研究。
BJOG. 2004 Sep;111(9):1001-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00222.x.
8
Randomised controlled trial comparing the efficacy of same-day administration of mifepristone and misoprostol for termination of pregnancy with the standard 36 to 48 hour protocol.一项随机对照试验,比较米非司酮与米索前列醇同日给药用于终止妊娠的疗效与标准的36至48小时方案。
BJOG. 2007 Feb;114(2):207-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01179.x.
9
Therapeutic termination of second trimester pregnancy with vaginal misoprostol.
J Med Assoc Thai. 2001 Apr;84(4):515-9.
10
Vaginal misoprostol compared with oral misoprostol in termination of second-trimester pregnancy.阴道用米索前列醇与口服米索前列醇用于终止中期妊娠的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Nov;90(5):735-8. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00419-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Methods for managing miscarriage: a network meta-analysis.流产管理方法:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 1;6(6):CD012602. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012602.pub2.
2
Medical treatment for early fetal death (less than 24 weeks).早期胎儿死亡(小于24周)的医学治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 17;6(6):CD002253. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002253.pub4.
3
Comparative Study of Misoprostol in First and Second Trimester Abortions by Oral, Sublingual, and Vaginal Routes.米索前列醇经口服、舌下含服及阴道途径用于孕早期和孕中期流产的比较研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2015 Jul;65(4):246-50. doi: 10.1007/s13224-014-0587-3. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
4
Contraceptive utilization and pregnancy termination among female sex workers in Afghanistan.阿富汗性工作者中的避孕措施利用和妊娠终止情况。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010 Nov;19(11):2057-62. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2010.1947. Epub 2010 Sep 29.
5
Medical treatment for early fetal death (less than 24 weeks).早期胎儿死亡(小于24周)的医学治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3):CD002253. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002253.pub3.