• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国儿童创伤护理的可及性。

Access to pediatric trauma care in the United States.

作者信息

Nance Michael L, Carr Brendan G, Branas Charles C

机构信息

Department of Surgery, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th and Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

出版信息

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Jun;163(6):512-8. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.65.

DOI:10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.65
PMID:19487606
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To catalog trauma center resources and estimate access to age-specific trauma care for children younger than 15 years in the United States.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study collating information from national, state, and local trauma systems authorities to create a catalog of verified pediatric trauma centers (PTCs) and self-designated "candidate" trauma centers. Access-to-care calculations were estimated using all US block groups and prior validated methods.

SETTING

United States.

PATIENTS

Children in the US younger than 15 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The PTC statuses of hospitals in the United States. Percentages of pediatric populations (by state and population density) having access (by ground or air) within 60 minutes to a PTC.

RESULTS

A total of 170 verified PTCs were identified in 41 states (including the District of Columbia). An estimated 71.5% of pediatric patients were within 60 minutes of a verified PTC by air or ground transport, 43% if ground transportation only was considered. An estimated 17.4 million children did not have access to a PTC within 60 minutes. Access ranged from 22.9% of the population in the most rural areas of the United States to 93.5% in the most urban. The addition of 24 candidate centers increased coverage to 77.4% of the pediatric population being within 60 minutes of a PTC.

CONCLUSIONS

Current pediatric trauma resources vary greatly by state and population density, with many children, particularly in rural areas, underserved. A thorough standardized catalog of verified PTCs is necessary to accurately assess pediatric trauma needs now and to optimize future trauma system planning for children.

摘要

目的

梳理美国创伤中心资源,并评估15岁以下儿童获得特定年龄段创伤护理的情况。

设计

横断面研究,整理来自国家、州和地方创伤系统管理部门的信息,以创建经核实的儿科创伤中心(PTC)和自行指定的“候选”创伤中心目录。使用美国所有普查街区组和先前经验证的方法估算获得护理的情况。

地点

美国

患者

美国15岁以下儿童

主要观察指标

美国医院的PTC状态。(按州和人口密度划分)在60分钟内可通过地面或空中交通到达PTC的儿科人群百分比。

结果

在41个州(包括哥伦比亚特区)共确定了170个经核实的PTC。估计71.5%的儿科患者可通过空中或地面交通在60分钟内到达经核实的PTC;若仅考虑地面交通,则为43%。估计有1740万儿童在60分钟内无法获得PTC的服务。获得服务的比例范围从美国最偏远农村地区的22.9%到最城市化地区的93.5%。增加24个候选中心后,覆盖率提高到77.4%的儿科人群可在60分钟内到达PTC。

结论

目前儿科创伤资源因州和人口密度而异,许多儿童,尤其是农村地区的儿童,服务不足。需要一份全面的经核实的PTC标准化目录,以准确评估当前儿科创伤需求,并优化未来儿童创伤系统规划。

相似文献

1
Access to pediatric trauma care in the United States.美国儿童创伤护理的可及性。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Jun;163(6):512-8. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.65.
2
Access to trauma centers in the United States.美国创伤中心的可及性。
JAMA. 2005 Jun 1;293(21):2626-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.21.2626.
3
Assessing access to paediatric trauma centres in Canada, and the impact of the golden hour on length of stay at the hospital: an observational study.评估加拿大儿科创伤中心的可及性,以及黄金一小时对住院时长的影响:一项观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 8;6(1):e010274. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010274.
4
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Access to Pediatric Trauma Centers in the United States: A Geographic Information Systems Analysis.美国儿科创伤中心就医机会中的种族和族裔差异:一项地理信息系统分析。
Ann Emerg Med. 2023 Mar;81(3):325-333. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.08.454. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
5
Injury-based Geographic Access to Trauma Centers.基于损伤的创伤中心地理可达性。
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Feb;26(2):192-204. doi: 10.1111/acem.13518. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
6
Access to pediatric trauma care: alignment of providers and health systems.儿科创伤救治的可及性:提供者和卫生系统的协调。
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2010 Jun;22(3):326-31. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e3283392a48.
7
Mapping US pediatric hospitals and subspecialty critical care for public health preparedness and disaster response, 2008.绘制美国儿科医院和亚专科危重病救治资源图,以用于公共卫生应急准备和灾害应对,2008 年。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2012 Jun;6(2):117-25. doi: 10.1001/dmp.2012.28.
8
Possible geographical barriers to trauma center access for vulnerable patients in the United States: an analysis of urban and rural communities.美国弱势患者获得创伤中心治疗可能面临的地理障碍:城乡社区分析
Arch Surg. 2011 Jan;146(1):46-52. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.299.
9
Closing the gap: Improving access to trauma care in New Mexico (2007-2017).弥合差距:改善新墨西哥州创伤护理的可及性(2007-2017 年)。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Nov;37(11):2028-2034. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.02.030. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
10
Helicopter interfacility transport of pediatric trauma patients: Are we overusing a costly resource?儿科创伤患者的直升机机构间转运:我们是否在过度使用一种昂贵的资源?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Feb;80(2):313-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000904.

引用本文的文献

1
Pediatric Readiness and Trauma Center Access for Children.儿童的儿科准备情况及创伤中心就医机会
JAMA Pediatr. 2025 Apr 1;179(4):455-462. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.6058.
2
Racial & ethnic disparities in geographic access to critical care in the United States: A geographic information systems analysis.美国关键医疗资源地理可及性的种族和民族差异:地理信息系统分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 1;18(11):e0287720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287720. eCollection 2023.
3
Does Trauma Center Volume Account for the Association Between Trauma Center Verification Level and In-Hospital Mortality among Children Injured by Firearms in California?
创伤中心容量是否可以解释加利福尼亚州因枪支受伤儿童的创伤中心验证级别与院内死亡率之间的关系?
J Am Coll Surg. 2023 Nov 1;237(5):738-749. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000818. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
4
Health Inequities in Pediatric Trauma.儿科创伤中的健康不平等现象
Children (Basel). 2023 Feb 9;10(2):343. doi: 10.3390/children10020343.
5
Measuring the impact of a "Virtual Pediatric Trauma Center" (VPTC) model of care using telemedicine for acutely injured children versus the standard of care: study protocol for a prospective stepped-wedge trial.使用远程医疗评估“虚拟儿科创伤中心”(VPTC)模式对急性创伤儿童的护理效果与标准护理的影响:一项前瞻性阶梯式试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Dec 27;23(1):1051. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06996-1.
6
National guideline for the field triage of injured patients: Recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage, 2021.国家受伤患者现场分类指南:国家现场分类专家小组 2021 年的建议。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022 Aug 1;93(2):e49-e60. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003627. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
7
Association between pediatric TBI mortality and median family income in the United States: A retrospective cohort study.美国儿童创伤性脑损伤死亡率与家庭收入中位数之间的关联:一项回顾性队列研究。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 Jan;5. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2021.100164. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
8
Disconnection in Information Exchange During Pediatric Trauma Transfers: A Qualitative Study.儿科创伤转运过程中信息交流的脱节:一项定性研究
J Patient Exp. 2021 Nov 26;8:23743735211056513. doi: 10.1177/23743735211056513. eCollection 2021.
9
Interest in Improving Access to Pediatric Trauma Care Through Telemedicine.通过远程医疗提高儿科创伤护理可及性的兴趣。
J Med Syst. 2021 Nov 9;45(12):108. doi: 10.1007/s10916-021-01789-6.
10
Pediatric trauma primary survey performance among surgical and non-surgical pediatric providers in a Brazilian trauma center.巴西一家创伤中心外科与非外科儿科医护人员的儿科创伤初级评估表现
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2020 Jul 21;5(1):e000451. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2020-000451. eCollection 2020.