Finestone Hillel M, Marshall Shawn C, Rozenberg Dmitry, Moussa Raffy C, Hunt Lynn, Greene-Finestone Linda S
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Elisabeth Bruyère Hospital, Bruyère Continuing Care, Ontario, Canada.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Nov;88(11):904-23. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181aa001e.
To determine the demographic, medical, and transportation use characteristics of stroke survivors wanting to drive who resumed or did not resume driving and compare the driving habits of those who drove with those of a nonstroke control group.
One hundred and six stroke survivors who underwent a driving evaluation at a rehabilitation center in Ottawa, Canada, between 1995 and 2003, participated in a structured telephone interview 4-5 yrs after the evaluation. Information on driving history and transportation use before the driving assessment was obtained from the driving assessment client database. The nonstroke control group was derived from the literature.
After stroke, 66% of subjects had resumed driving. Prestroke driving history was similar for drivers and nondrivers. Drivers were younger than nondrivers (mean age +/- SD, 62.7 +/- 12.7 yrs vs. 69.2 +/- 13.4 yrs; P = 0.02), had less medical comorbidity (mean modified Cumulative Illness Rating Scale score, 3.7 +/- 1.97 vs. 5.0 +/- 2.89; P = 0.01), and were less likely to rely on a walker (1.4% vs. 19.4%, P < 0.001). Self-imposed restrictions were reported by 35.7% of drivers. More nondrivers than drivers relied on family/friends (94.4% vs. 41.4%), public transportation (60.7% vs. 35.3%), or taxis (27.8% vs. 2.9%) (all P < 0.05). Drivers reported fewer driving difficulties (e.g., skill, weather, or traffic related; <or=20% for each) than the nonstroke group. Five of 12 licensed patients with stroke who drove to their first assessment failed it.
In a sample of stroke survivors who had similar driving histories before their stroke and who were deemed to have the potential to drive, those who resumed driving after their stroke were younger, had fewer medical problems, and were less disabled than those who did not return to driving. Self-imposed driving restrictions were common. Compared with drivers, nondrivers relied more on friends, family, public transportation, and taxis.
确定希望恢复驾驶的中风幸存者恢复或未恢复驾驶的人口统计学、医学和交通使用特征,并比较恢复驾驶的中风幸存者与非中风对照组的驾驶习惯。
1995年至2003年间在加拿大渥太华一家康复中心接受驾驶评估的106名中风幸存者,在评估后4至5年参加了一次结构化电话访谈。驾驶评估前的驾驶历史和交通使用信息从驾驶评估客户数据库中获取。非中风对照组来自文献。
中风后,66%的受试者恢复了驾驶。中风前,驾驶者和非驾驶者的驾驶历史相似。驾驶者比非驾驶者年轻(平均年龄±标准差,62.7±12.7岁对69.2±13.4岁;P = 0.02),合并症较少(平均改良累积疾病评定量表评分,3.7±1.97对5.0±2.89;P = 0.01),且使用助行器的可能性较小(1.4%对19.4%,P < 0.001)。35.7%的驾驶者报告有自我施加的限制。依赖家人/朋友(94.4%对41.4%)、公共交通(60.7%对35.3%)或出租车(27.8%对2.9%)的非驾驶者比驾驶者更多(所有P < 0.05)。与非中风组相比,驾驶者报告的驾驶困难较少(例如,技能、天气或交通相关;每项<或=20%)。12名有驾照的中风患者中,有5名在首次评估时开车前往,但未通过评估。
在中风前有相似驾驶历史且被认为有驾驶潜力的中风幸存者样本中,中风后恢复驾驶的人比未恢复驾驶的人更年轻,医疗问题更少,残疾程度更低。自我施加的驾驶限制很常见。与驾驶者相比,非驾驶者更多地依赖朋友、家人、公共交通和出租车。