Rapport Lisa J, Bryer Renee Coleman, Hanks Robin A
Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 May;89(5):922-30. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.01.009.
To examine resumption of driving after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and its relation to community integration.
Cross-sectional cohort study; survey and cognitive data.
Inpatient rehabilitation hospital of the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems and community.
Persons (N=261) ranging from 3 months to 15 years postinjury.
Not applicable.
Barriers to Driving Questionnaire, Driver Survey, Community Integration Measure, and Craig Hospital Assessment and Reporting Technique.
Forty-four percent of survivors had resumed driving; of nondrivers, 48% reported a strong desire to resume driving. Nondriver survivors who sought to resume driving generally rated themselves as currently fit to drive, viewed themselves as having physical and cognitive profiles like those of survivor drivers, and reported their greatest barriers to driving as social and resource related. However, cognitive functioning was similar to nondriver survivors who did not seek to resume driving and significantly worse than survivors who were currently driving. Nondrivers showed poorer community integration than did drivers, even after accounting for injury severity, social support, negative affectivity, and use of alternative transportation. Use of alternative transportation was common among nondrivers, but it was unrelated to community integration outcomes. Cognitive functioning moderated risk of adverse incident: among survivors with low cognitive functioning and high self-estimates of driving ability, which is indicative of unawareness of deficit, adverse incidents showed positive relation to amount of driving and inverse relation to cognitive functioning.
Driving status has unique and independent association with post-TBI community integration. Additional research is needed to evaluate transportation barriers that undermine full engagement in community living after TBI and to determine which barriers to driving reflect valid risk to survivors and the public.
研究创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后恢复驾驶的情况及其与社区融入的关系。
横断面队列研究;调查和认知数据。
创伤性脑损伤模型系统的住院康复医院及社区。
受伤后3个月至15年的人员(N = 261)。
不适用。
驾驶障碍问卷、驾驶员调查、社区融入测量以及克雷格医院评估与报告技术。
44%的幸存者已恢复驾驶;在未恢复驾驶的人中,48%表示强烈希望恢复驾驶。试图恢复驾驶的未驾驶幸存者普遍认为自己目前适合驾驶,认为自己的身体和认知状况与已恢复驾驶的幸存者相似,并报告他们恢复驾驶的最大障碍与社会和资源相关。然而,其认知功能与未试图恢复驾驶的未驾驶幸存者相似,且明显比目前正在驾驶的幸存者差。即使在考虑损伤严重程度、社会支持、负面情绪和替代交通方式的使用后,未驾驶幸存者的社区融入情况仍比驾驶者差。替代交通方式在未驾驶幸存者中很常见,但与社区融入结果无关。认知功能调节了不良事件的风险:在认知功能低且自我驾驶能力估计高(这表明对缺陷缺乏认识)的幸存者中,不良事件与驾驶量呈正相关,与认知功能呈负相关。
驾驶状态与创伤性脑损伤后的社区融入有着独特且独立的关联。需要进一步研究以评估破坏创伤性脑损伤后充分融入社区生活的交通障碍,并确定哪些驾驶障碍对幸存者和公众构成有效风险。