Suppr超能文献

在急性单纯性心房颤动患者中,静脉注射地尔硫䓬在实现心室率控制方面优于静脉注射胺碘酮或地高辛。

Intravenous diltiazem is superior to intravenous amiodarone or digoxin for achieving ventricular rate control in patients with acute uncomplicated atrial fibrillation.

作者信息

Siu Chung-Wah, Lau Chu-Pak, Lee Wai-Luen, Lam Kwok-Fai, Tse Hung-Fat

机构信息

Department of Medicine, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2009 Jul;37(7):2174-9; quiz 2180. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a02f56.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the clinical efficacy of intravenous diltiazem, digoxin, and amiodarone for acute ventricular rate (VR) control in patients with acute symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) necessitating hospitalization.

DESIGN

Randomized control trial.

SETTING

Acute emergency medical admission unit in a regional teaching hospital in Hong Kong.

PATIENTS

One hundred fifty adult patients with acute AF and rapid VR (>120 bpm).

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned in 1:1:1 ratio to receive intravenous diltiazem, digoxin, or amiodarone for VR control.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary end point was sustained VR control (<90 bpm) within 24 hours; the secondary end points included AF symptom improvement and length of hospitalization. At 24 hours, VR control was achieved in 119 of 150 patients (79%). The time to VR control was significantly shorter among patients in the diltiazem group (log-rank test, p < 0.0001) with the percentage of patients who achieved VR control being higher in the diltiazem group (90%) than the digoxin group (74%) and the amiodarone group (74%). The median time to VR control was significantly shorter in the diltiazem group (3 hours, 1-21 hours) compared with the digoxin (6 hours, 3-15 hours, p < 0.001) and amiodarone groups (7 hours, 1-18 hours, p = 0.003). Furthermore, patients in the diltiazem group persistently had the lowest mean VR after the first hour of drug administration compared with the other two groups (p < 0.05). The diltiazem group had the largest reduction in AF symptom frequency score and severity score (p < 0.0001). In addition, length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the diltiazem group (3.9 +/- 1.6 days) compared with digoxin (4.7 +/- 2.1 days, p = 0.023) and amiodarone groups (4.7 +/- 2.2 days, p = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

As compared with digoxin and amiodarone, intravenous diltiazem was safe and effective in achieving VR control to improve symptoms and to reduce hospital stay in patients with acute AF.

摘要

目的

比较静脉注射地尔硫䓬、地高辛和胺碘酮对因急性症状性心房颤动(AF)需住院治疗患者的急性心室率(VR)控制的临床疗效。

设计

随机对照试验。

地点

香港一家地区教学医院的急性急诊医学收治单元。

患者

150例急性AF且心室率快速(>120次/分钟)的成年患者。

干预措施

患者按1:1:1比例随机分配,接受静脉注射地尔硫䓬、地高辛或胺碘酮以控制VR。

测量指标及主要结果

主要终点为24小时内实现持续性VR控制(<90次/分钟);次要终点包括AF症状改善及住院时间。24小时时,150例患者中有119例(79%)实现了VR控制。地尔硫䓬组患者达到VR控制的时间显著更短(对数秩检验,p<0.0001),地尔硫䓬组实现VR控制的患者百分比(90%)高于地高辛组(74%)和胺碘酮组(74%)。与地高辛组(6小时,3 - 15小时,p<0.001)和胺碘酮组(7小时,1 - 18小时,p = 0.003)相比,地尔硫䓬组达到VR控制的中位时间显著更短(3小时,1 - 21小时)。此外,与其他两组相比,地尔硫䓬组患者在给药后第一小时后的平均VR持续最低(p<0.05)。地尔硫䓬组AF症状频率评分和严重程度评分降低幅度最大(p<0.0001)。此外,与地高辛组(4.7±2.1天,p = 0.023)和胺碘酮组(4.7±2.2天,p = 0.038)相比,地尔硫䓬组的住院时间显著更短(3.9±1.6天)。

结论

与地高辛和胺碘酮相比,静脉注射地尔硫䓬在实现VR控制以改善症状和缩短急性AF患者住院时间方面安全有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验