• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

后路腰丛阻滞用于全髋关节置换术后镇痛:0.5%布比卡因加肾上腺素与0.5%罗哌卡因的比较研究

Posterior lumbar plexus block in postoperative analgesia for total hip arthroplasty: a comparative study between 0.5% Bupivacaine with Epinephrine and 0.5% Ropivacaine.

作者信息

Duarte Leonardo Teixeira Domingues, Paes Franklin Cespedes, Fernandes Maria do Carmo Barreto C, Saraiva Renato Angelo

机构信息

Departamento de Anestesiologia Rede SARAH de Hospitais de Reabilitação SMHS 501, Conjunto A, Asa Sul70330-150 Brasília DF.

出版信息

Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2009 May-Jun;59(3):273-85. doi: 10.1590/s0034-70942009000300002.

DOI:10.1590/s0034-70942009000300002
PMID:19488540
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Posterior lumbar plexus block promotes effective postoperative analgesia in total knee arthroplasty. Ropivacaine and bupivacaine do not show differences in analgesic efficacy when used in different peripheral nerve blocks. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of postoperative analgesia resulting from the administration of a single dose of 0.5% bupivacaine or 0.5% ropivacaine in posterior lumbar plexus block for total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients were randomly divided in two groups according to the local anesthetic used: Group B - 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine; or group R - 0.5% ropivacaine. During the postoperative period, pain scores and morphine consumption in patient controlled analgesia were compared between groups. Bleeding during surgery and the incidence of side effects and complications were also compared.

RESULTS

Although pain scores were lower in Group R 8 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours after the blockade, these differences were not clinically significant. Multiple linear regression identified the local anesthetic as an independent variable. Differences in morphine consumption, intraoperative bleeding, and the incidence of complications and side effects were not observed between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

0.5% Bupivacaine and 0.5% ropivacaine produced effective and prolonged postoperative pain relief after total hip arthroplasty, without clinical differences, when equivalent doses were administered for posterior lumbar plexus block.

摘要

背景与目的

腰丛后路阻滞可促进全膝关节置换术后的有效镇痛。罗哌卡因和布比卡因用于不同的周围神经阻滞时,镇痛效果无差异。本研究的目的是比较在全髋关节置换术的腰丛后路阻滞中,单次给予0.5%布比卡因或0.5%罗哌卡因后的术后镇痛效果。

方法

37例患者根据所用局部麻醉药随机分为两组:B组——0.5%布比卡因加1:200,000肾上腺素;R组——0.5%罗哌卡因。术后比较两组患者的疼痛评分及患者自控镇痛中的吗啡用量。同时比较手术中的出血量以及副作用和并发症的发生率。

结果

尽管在阻滞后8小时、12小时和24小时R组的疼痛评分较低,但这些差异无临床意义。多元线性回归将局部麻醉药确定为一个自变量。两组之间在吗啡用量、术中出血以及并发症和副作用的发生率方面未观察到差异。

结论

在腰丛后路阻滞给予等效剂量时,0.5%布比卡因和0.5%罗哌卡因在全髋关节置换术后均产生了有效且持久的术后疼痛缓解,无临床差异。

相似文献

1
Posterior lumbar plexus block in postoperative analgesia for total hip arthroplasty: a comparative study between 0.5% Bupivacaine with Epinephrine and 0.5% Ropivacaine.后路腰丛阻滞用于全髋关节置换术后镇痛:0.5%布比卡因加肾上腺素与0.5%罗哌卡因的比较研究
Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2009 May-Jun;59(3):273-85. doi: 10.1590/s0034-70942009000300002.
2
Posterior lumbar plexus block in postoperative analgesia for total hip arthroplasty. A comparative study between 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine and 0.5% ropivacaine.后路腰丛阻滞用于全髋关节置换术后镇痛:0.5%布比卡因加肾上腺素与0.5%罗哌卡因的比较研究
Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2010 Mar-Apr;60(2):215-6, 124-5.
3
Continuous Posterior Lumbar Plexus Nerve Block Versus Periarticular Injection with Ropivacaine or Liposomal Bupivacaine for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Three-Arm Randomized Clinical Trial.连续后路腰丛神经阻滞与罗哌卡因或脂质体布比卡因关节周围注射用于全髋关节置换术:一项三臂随机临床试验。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Nov 1;99(21):1836-1845. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01305.
4
Lumbar plexus and sciatic nerve block for knee arthroplasty: comparison of ropivacaine and bupivacaine.用于膝关节置换术的腰丛和坐骨神经阻滞:罗哌卡因与布比卡因的比较
Can J Anaesth. 1998 Nov;45(11):1094-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03012398.
5
Continuous femoral versus posterior lumbar plexus nerve blocks for analgesia after hip arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled study.连续股神经阻滞与后路腰丛神经阻滞用于髋关节置换术后镇痛的随机对照研究。
Anesth Analg. 2011 Oct;113(4):897-903. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318212495b. Epub 2011 Apr 5.
6
Ropivacaine 0.25% is as effective as bupivacaine 0.25% in providing surgical anaesthesia for lumbar plexus and sciatic nerve block in high-risk patients: preliminary report.0.25%罗哌卡因在为高危患者进行腰丛和坐骨神经阻滞提供手术麻醉方面与0.25%布比卡因效果相当:初步报告。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007 Aug;35(4):510-4. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0703500408.
7
A clinical comparison of equal concentration and volume of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for interscalene brachial plexus anesthesia and analgesia in shoulder surgery.等浓度、等体积的罗哌卡因和布比卡因用于肩部手术肌间沟臂丛神经麻醉和镇痛的临床比较
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2004 Nov-Dec;29(6):539-43. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2004.07.224.
8
The efficacy of levobupivacaine, ropivacaine, and bupivacaine for combined psoas compartment-sciatic nerve block in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.左旋布比卡因、罗哌卡因和布比卡因用于全髋关节置换术患者腰大肌间隙-坐骨神经联合阻滞的疗效。
Pain Pract. 2008 Jul-Aug;8(4):241-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2008.00209.x. Epub 2008 May 23.
9
Single-injection femoral nerve block with 0.25% ropivacaine or 0.25% bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia after total knee replacement or anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.采用0.25%罗哌卡因或0.25%布比卡因单次注射股神经阻滞用于全膝关节置换或前交叉韧带重建术后镇痛。
J Clin Anesth. 2008 Nov;20(7):521-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.05.016. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
10
Relative Contributions of Adductor Canal Block and Intrathecal Morphine to Analgesia and Functional Recovery After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.股神经阻滞联合鞘内吗啡对全膝关节置换术后镇痛和功能恢复的相对作用:一项随机对照试验。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Feb;43(2):154-160. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000724.

引用本文的文献

1
Combined lumbar plexus and sciatic nerve block for hip fracture surgery in a patient with severe aortic stenosis.严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者髋部骨折手术的腰丛联合坐骨神经阻滞
J Anesth. 2011 Oct;25(5):784-5. doi: 10.1007/s00540-011-1179-3. Epub 2011 Jun 10.