• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将右心室心尖部起搏的起搏器患者升级为右心室间隔部起搏可改善左心室功能和功能容量。

Upgrading pacemaker patients with right ventricular apical pacing to right ventricular septal pacing improves left ventricular performance and functional capacity.

机构信息

Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009 Aug;20(8):901-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01470.x. Epub 2009 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01470.x
PMID:19490265
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Right ventricular (RV) apical pacing results in abnormal left ventricular (LV) electrical and mechanical activation and is associated with an increased risk of developing heart failure. Chronic RV septal pacing has been shown to be superior to RV apical pacing in newly implanted patients. However, whether RV septal pacing can reverse deleterious effects of RV apical pacing remain unclear.

METHODS

We evaluated the effects of RV septal pacing on LV performance and functional capacity before and at 18 months after device replacement in 12 patients with previously permanent RV apical pacing and in 12 control patients that continued RV apical pacing. All patients underwent radionuclide ventriculography and 6-minute hallwalk (6-MHW) test before replacement (baseline) and at 18 months afterward to determine changes in LV performance and functional capacity, respectively.

RESULTS

After RV septal upgraded, there was a significant decrease in paced QRS duration (171.2 +/- 3.9 ms to 160.4 +/- 3.5 ms, P = 0.0016), increase in LV ejection fraction (55.2 +/- 2.6% vs 60.4 +/- 2.9%, P = 0.0002), the peak ventricular filling rate (2.60 +/- 0.13 s(-1) vs 3.01 +/- 0.14 s(-1), P = 0.046), and 6-MHW (308.2 +/- 31.6 m vs 355.5 +/- 34.2 m, P = 0.015) at 18 months compared with baseline. No changes in these parameters were observed in the control group (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

RV septal pacing upgraded improves LV systolic and diastolic function and functional capacity in patients with previously permanent RV apical pacing. These findings suggest that RV septal pacing can reverse the deleterious effects of RV apical pacing in patients who required permanent ventricular pacing.

摘要

背景

右心室(RV)心尖部起搏导致左心室(LV)电和机械激活异常,并与心力衰竭风险增加相关。与新植入患者相比,慢性 RV 间隔部起搏已被证明优于 RV 心尖部起搏。然而,RV 间隔部起搏是否可以逆转 RV 心尖部起搏的有害影响尚不清楚。

方法

我们评估了 12 例先前接受永久性 RV 心尖部起搏的患者和 12 例继续接受 RV 心尖部起搏的对照患者在更换设备前后 18 个月时 RV 间隔部起搏对 LV 性能和功能能力的影响。所有患者在更换前(基线)和更换后 18 个月时均接受放射性核素心室造影和 6 分钟步行(6-MHW)试验,以分别确定 LV 性能和功能能力的变化。

结果

RV 间隔部升级后,起搏 QRS 持续时间明显缩短(171.2 +/- 3.9 ms 至 160.4 +/- 3.5 ms,P = 0.0016),LV 射血分数增加(55.2 +/- 2.6% 至 60.4 +/- 2.9%,P = 0.0002),峰值心室充盈率(2.60 +/- 0.13 s(-1)至 3.01 +/- 0.14 s(-1),P = 0.046)和 6-MHW(308.2 +/- 31.6 m 至 355.5 +/- 34.2 m,P = 0.015)在 18 个月时与基线相比。对照组这些参数无变化(P > 0.05)。

结论

RV 间隔部起搏升级可改善先前接受永久性 RV 心尖部起搏的患者的 LV 收缩和舒张功能以及功能能力。这些发现表明,在需要永久性心室起搏的患者中,RV 间隔部起搏可以逆转 RV 心尖部起搏的有害影响。

相似文献

1
Upgrading pacemaker patients with right ventricular apical pacing to right ventricular septal pacing improves left ventricular performance and functional capacity.将右心室心尖部起搏的起搏器患者升级为右心室间隔部起搏可改善左心室功能和功能容量。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009 Aug;20(8):901-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01470.x. Epub 2009 Apr 10.
2
Comparison of acute changes in left ventricular volume, systolic and diastolic functions, and intraventricular synchronicity after biventricular and right ventricular pacing for heart failure.双心室起搏与右心室起搏治疗心力衰竭后左心室容积、收缩和舒张功能及心室内同步性的急性变化比较
Am Heart J. 2003 May;145(5):E18. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00071-1.
3
Left ventricular septal and left ventricular apical pacing chronically maintain cardiac contractile coordination, pump function and efficiency.左心室间隔部起搏和左心室心尖部起搏可长期维持心脏收缩协调性、泵功能及效率。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009 Oct;2(5):571-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.109.882910. Epub 2009 Aug 25.
4
New-onset heart failure after permanent right ventricular apical pacing in patients with acquired high-grade atrioventricular block and normal left ventricular function.获得性高度房室传导阻滞且左心室功能正常的患者在永久性右心室心尖部起搏后新发心力衰竭
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008 Feb;19(2):136-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.01014.x. Epub 2007 Nov 12.
5
Long-term impact of right ventricular septal versus apical pacing on left ventricular synchrony and function in patients with second- or third-degree heart block.右心室间隔部起搏与心尖部起搏对二度或三度房室传导阻滞患者左心室同步性及功能的长期影响
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Apr 15;103(8):1096-101. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.12.029. Epub 2009 Feb 21.
6
Effect of long-term resynchronization therapy on left ventricular remodeling in pacemaker patients upgraded to biventricular devices.长期再同步治疗对升级为双心室起搏器患者左心室重构的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2009 May 1;103(9):1280-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.01.023.
7
A randomized comparison of permanent septal versus apical right ventricular pacing: short-term results.永久性间隔与右心室心尖部起搏的随机对照研究:短期结果
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006 Mar;17(3):238-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00358.x.
8
Septal pacing preserving better left ventricular mechanical performance and contractile synchronism than apical pacing in patients implanted with an atrioventricular sequential dual chamber pacemaker.对于植入房室顺序双腔起搏器的患者,与心尖部起搏相比,间隔部起搏能更好地保留左心室机械性能和收缩同步性。
Int J Cardiol. 2007 May 16;118(1):97-106. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.03.087. Epub 2006 Sep 8.
9
Long-term nonoutflow septal versus apical right ventricular pacing: relation to left ventricular dyssynchrony.长期非流出道间隔与右心室心尖部起搏:与左心室不同步的关系。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009 Mar;32(3):354-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.02244.x.
10
Search for the optimal right ventricular pacing site: design and implementation of three randomized multicenter clinical trials.寻找最佳右心室起搏部位:三项随机多中心临床试验的设计与实施
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009 Apr;32(4):426-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02301.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidence of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy in pacemaker-dependent patients is lower with leadless pacemakers compared to transvenous pacemakers.与经静脉起搏器相比,无导线起搏器用于依赖起搏器的患者时,起搏诱导性心肌病的发生率较低。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Feb;32(2):477-483. doi: 10.1111/jce.14814. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
2
Midrange ejection fraction as a risk factor for deterioration of cardiofunction after permanent pacemaker implantation.中等射血分数作为永久起搏器植入后心功能恶化的危险因素。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2019 Aug;55(2):213-224. doi: 10.1007/s10840-019-00513-2. Epub 2019 Feb 9.
3
Right Ventricular Versus Biventricular Pacing for Heart Failure and Atrioventricular Block.
右心室起搏与双心室起搏治疗心力衰竭和房室传导阻滞
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2016 Oct;13(5):230-236. doi: 10.1007/s11897-016-0299-3.
4
Endomyocardial implantation of autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells in advanced ischemic heart failure: a randomized placebo-controlled trial (END-HF).晚期缺血性心力衰竭患者自体骨髓单个核细胞心内膜心肌植入:一项随机安慰剂对照试验(END-HF)
J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2014 Aug;7(6):545-52. doi: 10.1007/s12265-014-9580-6. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
5
Separated right and left ventricular excitation during right ventricular septal pacing in a patient with narrow QRS wave: a case report.窄QRS波患者右心室间隔起搏时左右心室激动分离:一例报告
J Med Case Rep. 2014 May 21;8:158. doi: 10.1186/1752-1947-8-158.
6
Acute left ventricular dysfunction secondary to right ventricular septal pacing in a woman with initial preserved contractility: a case report.一名初始收缩功能正常的女性患者因右心室间隔起搏继发急性左心室功能障碍:病例报告
J Med Case Rep. 2011 Oct 25;5:524. doi: 10.1186/1752-1947-5-524.
7
AV Interval Optimization - A Step Towards Physiological Pacing in Patients with Normal Left Ventricular Function.房室间期优化——迈向左心室功能正常患者生理性起搏的一步。
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2010 Sep 5;10(9):379-82.