Karapinar-Carkit Fatma, Borgsteede Sander D, Zoer Jan, Smit Henk J, Egberts Antoine C G, van den Bemt Patricia M L A
Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Sint Lucas Andreas Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Ann Pharmacother. 2009 Jun;43(6):1001-10. doi: 10.1345/aph.1L597. Epub 2009 Jun 2.
Hospital admissions are a risk factor for the occurrence of unintended medication discrepancies between drugs used before admission and after discharge. To diminish such discrepancies and improve quality of care, medication reconciliation has been developed. The exact contribution of patient counseling to the medication reconciliation process is unknown, especially not when compared with community pharmacy medication records, which are considered reliable in the Netherlands.
To examine the effect of medication reconciliation with and without patient counseling among patients at the time of hospital discharge on the number and type of interventions aimed at preventing drug-related problems.
A prospective observational study in a general teaching hospital was performed. Patients discharged from the pulmonology department were included. A pharmacy team assessed the interventions with and without patient counseling on discharge medications for each patient.
Two hundred sixty-two patients were included. Medication reconciliation without patient counseling was responsible for at least one intervention in 87% of patients (mean 2.7 interventions/patient). After patient counseling, at least one intervention (mean 5.3 interventions/patient) was performed in 97% of patients. After patient counseling, discharge prescriptions were frequently adjusted due to discrepancies in use or need of drug therapy. Most interventions led to the start of medication due to omission and dose changes due to incorrect dosages being prescribed. Patients also addressed their problems/concerns with use of the drug, which were discussed before discharge.
Significantly more interventions were identified after patient counseling. Therefore, patient information is essential in medication reconciliation.
住院是入院前和出院后所使用药物之间出现意外用药差异的一个风险因素。为减少此类差异并提高护理质量,已开展了用药核对工作。患者咨询对用药核对过程的确切贡献尚不清楚,尤其是与荷兰被认为可靠的社区药房用药记录相比时。
研究出院时对患者进行或不进行患者咨询的用药核对,对旨在预防药物相关问题的干预措施的数量和类型的影响。
在一家普通教学医院进行了一项前瞻性观察研究。纳入了从肺病科出院的患者。一个药房团队评估了对每位患者出院用药进行或不进行患者咨询的干预措施。
纳入了262名患者。未进行患者咨询的用药核对导致87%的患者至少有一项干预措施(平均每位患者2.7项干预措施)。进行患者咨询后,97%的患者至少有一项干预措施(平均每位患者5.3项干预措施)。进行患者咨询后,由于药物治疗使用或需求方面的差异,出院处方经常被调整。大多数干预措施导致因遗漏而开始用药,以及因处方剂量不正确而改变剂量。患者还提出了他们在药物使用方面的问题/担忧,并在出院前进行了讨论。
进行患者咨询后发现的干预措施明显更多。因此,患者信息在用药核对中至关重要。