Greene Charles S, Goddard Greg, Macaluso Guido M, Mauro Giovanni
Department of Orthodontics, University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Dentistry, USA.
J Orofac Pain. 2009 Spring;23(2):93-107.
This article presents a comprehensive review of the topic of placebos, with a special focus on placebo analgesia. It includes a discussion of how placebos work (the placebo effect) and how patients react to them (the placebo response). A literature search was performed to identify relevant literature and publications related to the topic, and a qualitative assessment of papers was undertaken based on accepted rules for scientific evidence. The major finding from this review was that concepts about placebo effects and responses have changed dramatically over the years, especially in more recent years. This has occurred primarily as a result of more sophisticated experimental protocols using placebos in clinical studies of patients in pain, as well as various studies involving normal subjects. Our understanding of the biological and psychological mechanisms underlying placebo effects has expanded significantly due to recent developments in the technology of brain imaging. Based on findings from brain-imaging analyses, we now know that placebo analgesia is definitely a real (i.e., biologically measurable) phenomenon. It can be pharmacologically blocked and behaviorally enhanced, and these responses have been demonstrated to be similar to those elicited by administration of "real" analgesic substances. Psychological mechanisms involved in placebo analgesia include expectancy, meaning response, and classical conditioning. This article concludes with an emphasis on understanding therapeutic responses to various treatments for temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Acupuncture and splint therapy can be good examples of powerful placebos in the field of TMD, and both of these are discussed in detail. Present knowledge suggests that every treatment for pain contains a placebo component, which sometimes is as powerful as the so-called "active" counterpart. While the deceptive use of placebos must be considered unethical, every health provider who is treating pain patients must be aware of this important phenomenon in order to harness its huge potential.
本文对安慰剂这一主题进行了全面综述,特别关注安慰剂镇痛。它讨论了安慰剂的作用方式(安慰剂效应)以及患者对它们的反应(安慰剂反应)。进行了文献检索以识别与该主题相关的文献和出版物,并根据科学证据的公认规则对论文进行了定性评估。本次综述的主要发现是,多年来,尤其是近年来,关于安慰剂效应和反应的概念发生了巨大变化。这主要是由于在疼痛患者的临床研究中使用安慰剂的实验方案更加复杂,以及涉及正常受试者的各种研究。由于脑成像技术的最新发展,我们对安慰剂效应背后的生物学和心理机制的理解有了显著扩展。基于脑成像分析的结果,我们现在知道安慰剂镇痛绝对是一种真实的(即生物学上可测量的)现象。它可以被药理学阻断并通过行为增强,并且这些反应已被证明与给予“真正的”镇痛物质所引发的反应相似。安慰剂镇痛涉及的心理机制包括期望、意义反应和经典条件作用。本文最后强调了理解对颞下颌关节紊乱症(TMD)各种治疗的治疗反应。针灸和夹板疗法可以是TMD领域中强效安慰剂的很好例子,并且对这两者都进行了详细讨论。目前的知识表明,每种疼痛治疗都包含一个安慰剂成分,有时它与所谓的“活性”对应成分一样强大。虽然使用安慰剂进行欺骗必须被视为不道德,但每位治疗疼痛患者的医疗服务提供者都必须意识到这一重要现象,以便利用其巨大潜力。