Suppr超能文献

低分子量肝素的体外抗凝监测

In vitro anticoagulation monitoring of low-molecular-weight heparin.

作者信息

Wang Jian-qi, Shi Xu-bo, Yang Jin-gang, Hu Da-yi

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Chin Med J (Engl). 2009 May 20;122(10):1199-202.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although low-molecular-weight heparin has replaced unfractionated heparin to become the primary anticoagulation drug for treatment of acute coronary syndrome, there is no convenient bedside monitoring method. We explored the best laboratory monitoring method of low-molecular-weight heparins (enoxaparin, dalteparin, and nadroparin) by use of the Sonoclot coagulation analyzer to monitor the activated clotting time.

METHODS

A total of 20 healthy volunteers were selected and 15 ml of fasting venous blood samples were collected and incubated. Four coagulants, kaolin, diatomite, glass bead, and magnetic stick, were used to determine the activated clotting time of the low-molecular-weight heparins at different in vitro anti-Xa factor concentrations. A correlation analysis was made to obtain the regression equation. The activated clotting time of the different low-molecular-weight heparins with the same anti-Xa factor concentration was monitored when the coagulant glass beads were applied.

RESULTS

The activated clotting time measured using the glass beads, diatomite, kaolin, and magnetic stick showed a linear correlation with the concentration of nadroparin (r = 0.964, 0.966, 0.970, and 0.947, respectively). The regression equation showed that the linear slopes of different coagulants were significantly different (glass beads 230.03 s/IU, diatomite 89.91 s/IU, kaolin 50.87 s/IU, magnetic stick could not be calculated). When the concentration of the anti-Xa factor was the same for different low-molecular-weight heparins, the measured activated clotting time was different after the application of the glass bead coagulant.

CONCLUSIONS

The glass bead coagulant is most feasible for monitoring the in vitro anticoagulation activity of nadroparin. The different effects of different low-molecular-weight heparins on the activated clotting time may be related to the different anti-IIa activities.

摘要

背景

尽管低分子量肝素已取代普通肝素成为治疗急性冠状动脉综合征的主要抗凝药物,但尚无便捷的床旁监测方法。我们利用Sonoclot凝血分析仪监测活化凝血时间,探索低分子量肝素(依诺肝素、达肝素和那屈肝素)的最佳实验室监测方法。

方法

选取20名健康志愿者,采集15 ml空腹静脉血样本并进行孵育。使用高岭土、硅藻土、玻璃珠和磁棒四种促凝剂,测定不同体外抗Xa因子浓度下低分子量肝素的活化凝血时间。进行相关性分析以获得回归方程。应用促凝剂玻璃珠时,监测相同抗Xa因子浓度下不同低分子量肝素的活化凝血时间。

结果

使用玻璃珠、硅藻土、高岭土和磁棒测得的活化凝血时间与那屈肝素浓度呈线性相关(r分别为0.964、0.966、0.970和0.947)。回归方程显示不同促凝剂的线性斜率差异显著(玻璃珠230.03 s/IU,硅藻土89.91 s/IU,高岭土50.87 s/IU,磁棒无法计算)。不同低分子量肝素抗Xa因子浓度相同时,应用玻璃珠促凝剂后测得的活化凝血时间不同。

结论

玻璃珠促凝剂最适合监测那屈肝素的体外抗凝活性。不同低分子量肝素对活化凝血时间的不同影响可能与不同的抗IIa活性有关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验