Jonas U, Kramer A E
Department of Urology, Medical School Hannover, FRG.
Urol Int. 1991;47 Suppl 1:9-15. doi: 10.1159/000282240.
The use of computers in urodynamics must be based preferably on the structure of the urodynamic investigation itself. This enables implementation of computerized systems in the urodynamic laboratory in the most natural way and provides transparency of urodynamic software for the investigators. Additionally, the algorithms of the urodynamic software then can provide for a urodynamic investigation following a logical path based on the patient's history and clinical data and (automatically interpreted) results from earlier steps in the urodynamics. As an extension of this structured logical reasoning, the computer use in urodynamics can be extended to include validation and decision rules, comprising measurement data and rules for interpretation and combination of history, clinical and measurement data. Conclusions will be presented then in the form of a preliminary differential diagnosis, including the odds for each of the possible diagnoses. These kinds of computerized interpretation systems will be validated by comparison with the classical clinical diagnoses and are generally known as expert systems. These systems rely on logical branching-as opposed to systems that are statistical in nature and use large data bases to classify individual data into known groups. Data bases will remain for the purpose of documentation, based on individual patients and comprising all patient data-comparable to the existing patient files in the hospital's archives. The computer files have to include also the original data from functional studies like urodynamics-and not just the abstracted conclusions-and from imaging techniques. Intelligent compression of data prevents the data bases from exploding. Digital imaging techniques combined with computerized urodynamic investigations open possibilities for dynamic analysis of morphologic data and combination thereof with urodynamic measurement data.
在尿动力学中使用计算机最好应基于尿动力学检查本身的结构。这能以最自然的方式在尿动力学实验室中实现计算机系统,并为研究人员提供尿动力学软件的透明度。此外,尿动力学软件的算法随后可以根据患者病史和临床数据以及尿动力学早期步骤(自动解释)的结果,按照逻辑路径进行尿动力学检查。作为这种结构化逻辑推理的扩展,尿动力学中的计算机应用可以扩展到包括验证和决策规则,涵盖测量数据以及病史、临床和测量数据的解释与组合规则。然后结论将以初步鉴别诊断的形式呈现,包括每种可能诊断的可能性。这类计算机化解释系统将通过与经典临床诊断进行比较来验证,通常被称为专家系统。这些系统依赖于逻辑分支——这与本质上是统计性的、使用大型数据库将个体数据分类到已知组别的系统不同。基于个体患者并包含所有患者数据的数据库将保留用于文档记录——类似于医院档案中现有的患者文件。计算机文件还必须包括来自尿动力学等功能研究的原始数据——而不仅仅是抽象的结论——以及来自成像技术的数据。数据的智能压缩可防止数据库膨胀。数字成像技术与计算机化尿动力学检查相结合,为形态学数据的动态分析及其与尿动力学测量数据的组合开辟了可能性。