Bell M B V, Radford A N, Rose R, Wade H M, Ridley A R
Large Animal Research Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Aug 22;276(1669):2997-3005. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0276. Epub 2009 Jun 3.
In risky environments, where threats are unpredictable and the quality of information about threats is variable, all individuals face two fundamental challenges: balancing vigilance against other activities, and determining when to respond to warning signals. The solution to both is to obtain continuous estimates of background risk, enabling vigilance to be concentrated during the riskiest periods and informing about the likely cost of ignoring warnings. Human surveillance organizations routinely produce such estimates, frequently derived from indirect cues. Here we show that vigilant individuals in an animal society (the pied babbler, Turdoides bicolor) perform a similar role. We ask (i) whether, in the absence of direct predator threats, pied babbler sentinels react to indirect information associated with increased risk and whether they communicate this information to group mates; (ii) whether group mates use this information to adjust their own vigilance, and whether this influences foraging success; and (iii) whether information provided by sentinels reduces the likelihood of inappropriate responses to alarm calls. Using playback experiments, we show that: (i) sentinels reacted to indirect predator cues (in the form of heterospecific alarm calls) by giving graded surveillance calls; (ii) foragers adjusted their vigilance in reaction to changes in surveillance calls, with substantial effects on foraging success; and (iii) foragers reduced their probability of responding to alarm calls when surveillance calls indicated lowered risk. These results demonstrate that identifying attacks as they occur is only part of vigilance: equally important is continuous surveillance providing information necessary for individuals to make decisions about their own vigilance and evasive action. Moreover, they suggest that a major benefit of group living is not only the increased likelihood of detecting threats, but a marked improvement in the quality of information available to each individual.
在危险环境中,威胁不可预测且有关威胁的信息质量参差不齐,所有个体都面临两个基本挑战:在保持警惕与开展其他活动之间进行平衡,以及确定何时对警告信号做出反应。解决这两个问题的方法是持续评估背景风险,以便在风险最高的时期集中保持警惕,并告知忽视警告可能带来的代价。人类监视组织经常进行这样的评估,这些评估通常来自间接线索。在此我们表明,动物群体(双色姬鹟,Turdoides bicolor)中的警惕个体也发挥着类似作用。我们探究:(i)在没有直接捕食者威胁的情况下,双色姬鹟哨兵是否会对与风险增加相关的间接信息做出反应,以及它们是否会将此信息传达给群体中的同伴;(ii)群体中的同伴是否利用这些信息来调整自身的警惕性,以及这是否会影响觅食成功率;(iii)哨兵提供的信息是否会降低对警报叫声做出不适当反应的可能性。通过回放实验,我们发现:(i)哨兵通过发出分级监视叫声对间接捕食者线索(以异种警报叫声的形式)做出反应;(ii)觅食者根据监视叫声的变化调整自身警惕性,这对觅食成功率有显著影响;(iii)当监视叫声表明风险降低时,觅食者对警报叫声做出反应的概率降低。这些结果表明,在攻击发生时识别攻击只是警惕行为的一部分:同样重要的是持续监视,它为个体做出关于自身警惕性和规避行动的决策提供必要信息。此外,这些结果表明群居生活的一个主要好处不仅在于发现威胁的可能性增加,还在于每个个体可获得的信息质量有显著提高。