• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

觅食群体中的个体在评估自身对反捕食警惕的需求时可能会使用声音线索。

Individuals in foraging groups may use vocal cues when assessing their need for anti-predator vigilance.

作者信息

Radford Andrew N, Ridley Amanda R

机构信息

School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, UK.

出版信息

Biol Lett. 2007 Jun 22;3(3):249-52. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0110.

DOI:10.1098/rsbl.2007.0110
PMID:17426006
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2464705/
Abstract

Many studies of social species have reported variation in the anti-predator vigilance behaviour of foraging individuals depending on the presence and relative position of other group members. However, little attention has focused on how foragers assess these variables. It is commonly assumed that they do so visually, but many social species produce frequent calls while foraging, and these 'close' calls might provide valuable spatial information. Here, we show that foraging pied babblers (Turdoides bicolor) are less vigilant when in larger groups, in the centre of a group and in closer proximity to another group member. We then show that foragers are less vigilant during playbacks of close calling by more individuals and individuals on either side of them when compared with calls of fewer individuals and calls on one side of them. These results suggest that foragers can use vocal cues to gain information on group size and their spatial position within a group. Future studies of anti-predator vigilance should consider the relative importance of both visual and vocal monitoring of group members.

摘要

许多关于群居物种的研究报告称,觅食个体的反捕食警惕行为会因其他群体成员的存在和相对位置而有所不同。然而,很少有研究关注觅食者如何评估这些变量。人们通常认为它们是通过视觉来评估的,但许多群居物种在觅食时会频繁发出叫声,而这些“近距离”叫声可能会提供有价值的空间信息。在这里,我们表明,觅食的双色蚁鵙在群体规模较大、处于群体中心以及与另一个群体成员距离更近时,警惕性会降低。然后我们表明,与较少个体的叫声以及一侧的叫声相比,当更多个体以及两侧的个体发出近距离叫声时,觅食者在回放这些叫声时的警惕性会降低。这些结果表明,觅食者可以利用声音线索来获取关于群体规模及其在群体中空间位置的信息。未来关于反捕食警惕性的研究应考虑对群体成员进行视觉和声音监测的相对重要性。

相似文献

1
Individuals in foraging groups may use vocal cues when assessing their need for anti-predator vigilance.觅食群体中的个体在评估自身对反捕食警惕的需求时可能会使用声音线索。
Biol Lett. 2007 Jun 22;3(3):249-52. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0110.
2
The higher the better: sentinel height influences foraging success in a social bird.越高越好:哨兵高度对群居鸟类觅食成功的影响
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jul 7;276(1666):2437-42. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0187. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
3
The value of constant surveillance in a risky environment.在危险环境中持续监测的价值。
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Aug 22;276(1669):2997-3005. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0276. Epub 2009 Jun 3.
4
Behavioural responses of Eastern grey squirrels, Sciurus carolinensis, to cues of risk while foraging.东部灰松鼠(Sciurus carolinensis)在觅食时对风险线索的行为反应。
Behav Processes. 2015 Jul;116:53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.05.002. Epub 2015 May 6.
5
Cooperative sentinel calling? Foragers gain increased biomass intake.合作式哨兵鸣叫?觅食者的生物量摄入量增加。
Curr Biol. 2008 Apr 22;18(8):576-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.02.078.
6
Interspecific audience effects on the alarm-calling behaviour of a kleptoparasitic bird.种间观众效应 对 一种盗寄生鸟类报警行为的影响
Biol Lett. 2007 Dec 22;3(6):589-91. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0325.
7
Titmouse calling and foraging are affected by head and body orientation of cat predator models and possible experience with real cats.簇山雀的鸣叫和觅食行为受到猫捕食者模型的头部和身体朝向以及与真实猫咪的可能经历的影响。
Anim Cogn. 2015 Sep;18(5):1155-64. doi: 10.1007/s10071-015-0888-7. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
8
The presence of an avian co-forager reduces vigilance in a cooperative mammal.有禽类共同觅食者的存在会降低合作哺乳动物的警戒性。
Biol Lett. 2010 Aug 23;6(4):475-7. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.1016. Epub 2010 Feb 3.
9
Meaningful call combinations and compositional processing in the southern pied babbler.南部大斑蚁鵙中有意义的叫声组合与成分处理
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 May 24;113(21):5976-81. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1600970113. Epub 2016 May 6.
10
Anthropogenic noise disrupts use of vocal information about predation risk.人为噪音干扰了对捕食风险的声音信息的利用。
Environ Pollut. 2016 Nov;218:988-995. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.08.049. Epub 2016 Aug 29.

引用本文的文献

1
The relative contribution of acoustic signals versus movement cues in group coordination and collective decision-making.声信号与运动线索在群体协调和集体决策中的相对贡献。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Jul 8;379(1905):20230184. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0184. Epub 2024 May 20.
2
Foraging ecology drives social information reliance in an avian eavesdropping community.觅食生态驱动鸟类窃听群落对社会信息的依赖。
Ecol Evol. 2019 Sep 14;9(20):11584-11597. doi: 10.1002/ece3.5561. eCollection 2019 Oct.
3
Eavesdropping grey squirrels infer safety from bird chatter. eavesdropping 灰松鼠从鸟鸣中推断出安全信息。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 4;14(9):e0221279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221279. eCollection 2019.
4
Group association and vocal behaviour during foraging trips in Gentoo penguins.在觅食过程中,群体关联和叫声行为在巴布亚企鹅中存在。
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 17;7(1):7570. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07900-7.
5
The sentinel behaviour of Arabian babbler floaters.阿拉伯鸫鹛游荡者的哨兵行为。
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Feb 8;4(2):160738. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160738. eCollection 2017 Feb.
6
Discrete call types referring to predation risk enhance the efficiency of the meerkat sentinel system.离散的报警类型与捕食风险相关,提高了猫鼬放哨系统的效率。
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 17;7:44436. doi: 10.1038/srep44436.
7
Validation of trophic and anthropic underwater noise as settlement trigger in blue mussels.验证营养和人为水下噪声作为贻贝附着的触发因素。
Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 20;6:33829. doi: 10.1038/srep33829.
8
Meaningful call combinations and compositional processing in the southern pied babbler.南部大斑蚁鵙中有意义的叫声组合与成分处理
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 May 24;113(21):5976-81. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1600970113. Epub 2016 May 6.
9
Communication about social status.关于社会地位的交流。
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2014 Oct;28:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2014.04.004. Epub 2014 May 6.
10
Negotiating a stable solution for vigilance behaviour.为警惕行为协商出一个稳定的解决方案。
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Sep 22;279(1743):3633-4. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1210. Epub 2012 Jul 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Individual voice recognition in birds.鸟类的个体声音识别
Trends Ecol Evol. 1992 Jun;7(6):178-9. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(92)90068-M.
2
Recruitment calling: a novel form of extended parental care in an altricial species.招募鸣叫:一种晚成雏物种中亲代抚育延长的新形式。
Curr Biol. 2006 Sep 5;16(17):1700-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.06.053.
3
Visual perception and social foraging in birds.鸟类的视觉感知与社会觅食
Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Jan;19(1):25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2003.10.003.
4
Group-size effects on vigilance: a search for mechanisms.群体规模对警觉性的影响:机制探寻
Behav Processes. 2003 Jul 31;63(3):111-121. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(03)00002-0.
5
Theory and method in studies of vigilance and aggregation.警惕性与聚集性研究中的理论与方法。
Anim Behav. 2000 Dec;60(6):711-722. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1528.
6
On the advantages of flocking.论植绒的优点。
J Theor Biol. 1973 Feb;38(2):419-22. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(73)90184-7.