Suppr超能文献

患者龋病风险评估。

Patient caries risk assessment.

作者信息

Twetman Svante, Fontana Margherita

出版信息

Monogr Oral Sci. 2009;21:91-101. doi: 10.1159/000224214. Epub 2009 Jun 3.

Abstract

Risk assessment is an essential component in the decision-making process for the correct prevention and management of dental caries. Multiple risk factors and indicators have been proposed as targets in the assessment of risk of future disease, varying sometimes based on the age group at which they are targeted. Multiple reviews and systematic reviews are available in the literature on this topic. This chapter focusses primarily on results of reviews based on longitudinal studies required to establish the accuracy of caries risk assessment. These findings demonstrate that there is a strong body of evidence to support that caries experience is still, unfortunately, the single best predictor for future caries development. In young children, prediction models which include a variety of risk factors seem to increase the accuracy of the prediction, while the usefulness of additional risk factors for prediction purposes, as measured until now in the literature, is at best questionable in schoolchildren, adolescents and adults. That is not to say these additional factors should not be assessed to help understand the strength of their associations with the disease experience in a particular patient, and aid in the development of an individualized and targeted preventive and management plan.

摘要

风险评估是正确预防和管理龋齿的决策过程中的一个重要组成部分。多种风险因素和指标已被提出作为未来疾病风险评估的目标,有时会根据其针对的年龄组而有所不同。关于这个主题,文献中有多项综述和系统评价。本章主要关注基于纵向研究的综述结果,这些研究对于确定龋齿风险评估的准确性是必需的。这些发现表明,不幸的是,仍有大量证据支持龋齿经历仍然是未来龋齿发展的最佳单一预测指标。在幼儿中,包含多种风险因素的预测模型似乎可以提高预测的准确性,而从目前文献中衡量的情况来看,额外风险因素在学龄儿童、青少年和成年人中的预测用途充其量是值得怀疑的。这并不是说不应该评估这些额外因素,以帮助了解它们与特定患者疾病经历的关联强度,并有助于制定个性化和有针对性的预防及管理计划。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验