Knight D H
Department of Clinical Studies, University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine, Philadelphia.
Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 1991 Sep;21(5):879-904. doi: 10.1016/s0195-5616(91)50101-7.
The clinical literature on the subject of inotropic therapy of heart failure, particularly use of digitalis glycosides, is full of contradictions. Most of this disparity can be accounted for if not reconciled by taking the methodology of the clinical trials into consideration. Because drug interventions may produce subtle effects requiring a subjective determination, the questions being asked in these studies cannot be answered without removing as many sources of bias as possible from the patient management and data analysis. If a study has not been adequately randomized, double-blinded, and placebo-controlled, the clinical findings will be inconclusive at best. Systolic myocardial dysfunction plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of CHF in many patients and is a prerequisite for the use of cardiotonic drugs. Although the clinical signs of heart failure may be relieved initially by diuretics and vasodilators, compensation may require the addition of a positive inotrope, particularly in advanced cases. In veterinary medicine, the choice of positive inotrope is limited to digoxin, digitoxin, dobutamine, or amrinone. Digoxin possesses superior pharmacokinetics and is the cardiac glycoside of choice for use in the dog. Dobutamine and amrinone are more potent inotropes, but since they must be administered by continuous intravenous infusion, their use is limited to critical care therapy. At the present time, only digoxin can be administered orally for sustained long-term maintenance therapy. Milrinone, a more potent derivative of amrinone, also offers this option, but it has not been available since its brief trial debut as an investigational drug. None of the nonglycoside alternatives couples the benefits of positive inotropic and negative chronotropic effects. Consequently, digoxin remains the mainstay for chronic inotropic support of the heart. Atrial fibrillation with a rapid ventricular response rate is the prime indication for digoxin. In the last few years, evidence from methodologically sound clinical trials on humans has also restored faith in the efficacy of digoxin for treating heart failure in patients with normal sinus rhythm. From these studies, the profile of a digitalis responsive heart failure patient has emerged. Digoxin is most likely to be efficacious when heart failure is associated with chronic, severe ventricular systolic dysfunction, which has resulted in ventricular dilatation. The most reliable clinical marker is the presence of a third heart sound (gallop rhythm). Although the patients in the worst heart failure generally have the shortest survival time, they may also have the most dramatic short-term clinical benefit. However, once cardiac reserve is exhausted in the terminal stages of failure, cardiotonic stimulation ceases to be effective.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
关于心力衰竭的强心治疗,尤其是洋地黄苷类药物的使用,临床文献中充满了矛盾之处。如果考虑临床试验的方法,大部分这种差异即使不能完全消除也能得到解释。由于药物干预可能产生需要主观判断的细微效果,若不尽可能消除患者管理和数据分析中的偏差来源,这些研究中提出的问题就无法得到解答。如果一项研究没有进行充分的随机化、双盲和安慰剂对照,其临床结果充其量也只是不确定的。收缩性心肌功能障碍在许多患者的慢性心力衰竭发病机制中起关键作用,是使用强心药物的前提条件。虽然心力衰竭的临床症状最初可能通过利尿剂和血管扩张剂得到缓解,但代偿可能需要加用正性肌力药物,尤其是在晚期病例中。在兽医学中,正性肌力药物的选择仅限于地高辛、洋地黄毒苷、多巴酚丁胺或氨力农。地高辛具有优越的药代动力学特性,是犬类使用的首选强心苷。多巴酚丁胺和氨力农是更强效的正性肌力药物,但由于它们必须通过持续静脉输注给药,其使用仅限于重症监护治疗。目前,只有地高辛可以口服用于长期维持治疗。米力农是氨力农的一种更强效衍生物,也有这种选择,但自其作为研究药物短暂试用以来就无法获得。非苷类替代药物都没有兼具正性肌力和负性变时作用的优点。因此,地高辛仍然是心脏慢性强心支持的主要药物。快速心室反应率的心房颤动是地高辛的主要适应证。在过去几年中,来自方法学合理的人体临床试验的证据也恢复了人们对地高辛治疗窦性心律正常患者心力衰竭疗效的信心。从这些研究中,已出现了对洋地黄有反应的心力衰竭患者的特征。当心力衰竭与慢性、严重的心室收缩功能障碍相关并导致心室扩张时,地高辛最有可能有效。最可靠的临床指标是第三心音(奔马律)的存在。虽然心力衰竭最严重的患者通常生存时间最短,但他们也可能有最显著的短期临床获益。然而,一旦在心力衰竭终末期心脏储备耗尽,强心刺激就不再有效。(摘要截选至400词)