Truc Phan T H, Kim Tae-Seong, Lee Sungyoung, Lee Young-Koo
Department of Computer Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
J Digit Imaging. 2010 Dec;23(6):793-805. doi: 10.1007/s10278-009-9210-z. Epub 2009 Jun 4.
Automatic bone segmentation of computed tomography (CT) images is an important step in image-guided surgery that requires both high accuracy and minimal user interaction. Previous attempts include global thresholding, region growing, region competition, watershed segmentation, and parametric active contour (AC) approaches, but none claim fully satisfactory performance. Recently, geometric or level-set-based AC models have been developed and appear to have characteristics suitable for automatic bone segmentation such as initialization insensitivity and topology adaptability. In this study, we have tested the feasibility of five level-set-based AC approaches for automatic CT bone segmentation with both synthetic and real CT images: namely, the geometric AC, geodesic AC, gradient vector flow fast geometric AC, Chan-Vese (CV) AC, and our proposed density distance augmented CV AC (Aug. CV AC). Qualitative and quantitative evaluations have been made in comparison with the segmentation results from standard commercial software and a medical expert. The first three models showed their robustness to various image contrasts, but their performances decreased much when noise level increased. On the contrary, the CV AC's performance was more robust to noise, yet dependent on image contrast. On the other hand, the Aug. CV AC demonstrated its robustness to both noise and contrast levels and yielded improved performances on a set of real CT data compared with the commercial software, proving its suitability for automatic bone segmentation from CT images.
计算机断层扫描(CT)图像的自动骨分割是图像引导手术中的重要步骤,这需要高精度和最少的用户交互。以往的尝试包括全局阈值化、区域生长、区域竞争、分水岭分割和参数主动轮廓(AC)方法,但都没有声称具有完全令人满意的性能。最近,基于几何或水平集的AC模型已经被开发出来,并且似乎具有适合自动骨分割的特性,如初始化不敏感性和拓扑适应性。在本研究中,我们用合成CT图像和真实CT图像测试了五种基于水平集的AC方法用于自动CT骨分割的可行性:即几何AC、测地线AC、梯度向量流快速几何AC、Chan-Vese(CV)AC以及我们提出的密度距离增强CV AC(Aug. CV AC)。与标准商业软件和医学专家的分割结果相比,我们进行了定性和定量评估。前三种模型对各种图像对比度显示出鲁棒性,但当噪声水平增加时,它们的性能大幅下降。相反,CV AC的性能对噪声更鲁棒,但依赖于图像对比度。另一方面,Aug. CV AC对噪声和对比度水平都表现出鲁棒性,并且与商业软件相比,在一组真实CT数据上表现出更好的性能,证明了其适用于从CT图像中进行自动骨分割。