Division of Psychology in Education, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-0611, USA.
Pediatr Diabetes. 2009 Dec;10(8):554-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2009.00532.x. Epub 2009 Jun 3.
Children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) are at risk for a variety of problems at school. Well-controlled studies using data collected in schools, however, are limited. The purposes of this study are to determine whether selected school problems are associated with T1DM and to investigate an association between these problems and medical variables. Teachers rated 95 diabetic students (M = 11.8; SD = 3.0 yr old) and 95 of their siblings (M = 12.1; SD = 3.0 yr old) regarding academic skills, work completion, day-to-day variability, and classroom attention. Medical and school records also were accessed. The T1DM group had lower academic skills ratings overall (p < 0.02), especially in writing (p < 0.01), a trend toward poorer classroom attention (p < 0.08), and many more missed school days (p < 0.001). Diabetics on intensive therapy protocols had better academic ratings overall (p < 0.02), including in math (p < 0.03) and fewer missed school days (p < 0.03), but they unexpectedly were rated as having more classroom behaviors that jeopardize work completion (p < 0.05) than counterparts on conventional therapy. Among all diabetics, glycated hemoglobin (HbA(lc)) levels were moderately related to each academic skill rating (r = -0.34 to -0.37; p < 0.01) and strongly related to classroom attention (r = 0.53; p = 0.000). T1DM itself appears to be a relatively minor influence to several important aspects of school. Furthermore, although intensive therapy alone may well promote school success, meticulous glycemic control, however achieved, appears more important in mitigating prospective classroom attention and academic problems.
儿童和青少年 1 型糖尿病(T1DM)在学校存在多种问题的风险。然而,使用在校内收集的数据进行的对照研究非常有限。本研究旨在确定特定的学校问题是否与 T1DM 相关,并研究这些问题与医疗变量之间的关联。教师对 95 名糖尿病学生(M=11.8;SD=3.0 岁)及其 95 名兄弟姐妹(M=12.1;SD=3.0 岁)的学术技能、作业完成情况、日常变化和课堂注意力进行了评估。还查阅了医疗和学校记录。T1DM 组的整体学术技能评分较低(p<0.02),尤其是在写作方面(p<0.01),课堂注意力也存在较差的趋势(p<0.08),且缺课天数较多(p<0.001)。接受强化治疗方案的糖尿病患者整体学术评分较好(p<0.02),包括在数学方面(p<0.03)和缺课天数较少(p<0.03),但他们在课堂上完成作业的行为却出乎意料地被评为更多(p<0.05),而传统治疗的对照组则更少。在所有糖尿病患者中,糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平与每个学术技能评分中等相关(r=-0.34 至-0.37;p<0.01),与课堂注意力高度相关(r=0.53;p=0.000)。T1DM 本身似乎对学校的几个重要方面影响相对较小。此外,尽管强化治疗本身可能会促进学业成功,但无论如何实现的精细血糖控制,对于减轻潜在的课堂注意力和学术问题似乎更为重要。