Berger Jill, Topp Robert, Davis Linda, Jones Jeffrey, Stewart Lynne
Kosair Children's Hospital, 231 E. Chestnut St., Box N-38, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
J Nurses Staff Dev. 2009 May-Jun;25(3):127-32; quiz 133-4. doi: 10.1097/NND.0b013e3181a56ba0.
The authors examined education records of 1,661 registered nurses from four affiliated hospitals who attended either a 1-hr face-to-face instructor-led training program, an instructor-facilitated Web-based training program, or an independent Web-based training program to fulfill a training requirement concerning patient education. The authors compared post-test results, course evaluation results, and costs and also developed a demographic profile of nurses' preferences for Web-based and face-to-face learning options. There was no significant difference in course effectiveness or satisfaction between the training methods studied; however, because of the large number of nurses who selected Web-based training, it was the most cost-effective alternative.
作者检查了来自四家附属医院的1661名注册护士的教育记录，这些护士参加了为期1小时的面对面教员主导培训项目、教员辅助的基于网络的培训项目或独立的基于网络的培训项目，以满足有关患者教育的培训要求。作者比较了测试后结果、课程评估结果和成本，并绘制了护士对基于网络和面对面学习方式偏好的人口统计学概况。在所研究的培训方法之间，课程效果或满意度没有显著差异；然而，由于选择基于网络培训的护士数量众多，它是最具成本效益的选择。
