• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对性教育干预对军队人群中焚烧垃圾致伤发生率的影响。

Effect of a targeted education intervention on the incidence of waste-burning injuries in a military population.

作者信息

Kauvar David S, Baer David G

机构信息

United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, Texas 78234, USA.

出版信息

J Burn Care Res. 2009 Jul-Aug;30(4):700-4. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181ac0190.

DOI:10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181ac0190
PMID:19506492
Abstract

The burning of waste is a common cause of accidental injury on the battlefield. This study was devised to determine the incidence of burns incurred while burning waste during U.S. military operations prior to and following an intervention targeted at reducing such injuries. The intervention consisted of memoranda outlining potential dangers and suggesting improved safety procedures. It was distributed to the combat theater (Iraq and Afghanistan) in March 2004. We reviewed military burn center records from March 2003 to March 2005. Demographics, injury data, and outcomes were recorded and compared between those casualties injured prior to and following the initiative. Twenty-four patients were injured while burning waste, 10% of military casualties admitted to the burn center during the study period. From March 2003 to March 2004, 20 patients were admitted with such injuries. The incidence of 1.67 per month was significantly (P<.05) higher than that seen the year after the intervention (four patients, 0.33 per month). TBSA burned was not different between the two time periods (9.8+/-8% before vs 6.3+/-7% after, P=.43). There were no deaths, and only one patient had an associated nonburn injury. Only 54% of patients returned to military duty. The initiative was followed by a significant decrease in the incidence of waste-burning injuries. We conclude that the initiative was successful and highlights the importance of continued military burn surveillance and prevention efforts.

摘要

焚烧垃圾是战场上意外伤害的常见原因。本研究旨在确定在一项旨在减少此类伤害的干预措施实施前后,美国军事行动中焚烧垃圾时所导致烧伤的发生率。该干预措施包括概述潜在危险并建议改进安全程序的备忘录。它于2004年3月分发给作战区域(伊拉克和阿富汗)。我们回顾了2003年3月至2005年3月军事烧伤中心的记录。记录了人口统计学、损伤数据和结果,并对该倡议实施前后受伤的伤亡人员进行了比较。24名患者在焚烧垃圾时受伤,占研究期间入住烧伤中心的军事伤亡人员的10%。2003年3月至2004年3月,有20名此类受伤患者入院。每月1.67例的发生率显著高于干预措施实施后的第二年(4例患者,每月0.33例)(P<0.05)。两个时间段的烧伤总面积无差异(干预前为9.8±8%,干预后为6.3±7%,P = 0.43)。无死亡病例,只有1名患者伴有非烧伤损伤。只有54%的患者重返军事岗位。该倡议实施后,焚烧垃圾导致的受伤发生率显著下降。我们得出结论,该倡议是成功的,并突出了持续进行军事烧伤监测和预防工作的重要性。

相似文献

1
Effect of a targeted education intervention on the incidence of waste-burning injuries in a military population.针对性教育干预对军队人群中焚烧垃圾致伤发生率的影响。
J Burn Care Res. 2009 Jul-Aug;30(4):700-4. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181ac0190.
2
Burn hazards of the deployed environment in wartime: epidemiology of noncombat burns from ongoing United States military operations.战时部署环境中的烧伤风险:美国正在进行的军事行动中非战斗烧伤的流行病学情况
J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Oct;209(4):453-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.06.367. Epub 2009 Aug 8.
3
Comparison of combat and non-combat burns from ongoing U.S. military operations.美国正在进行的军事行动中战斗烧伤与非战斗烧伤的比较。
J Surg Res. 2006 May 15;132(2):195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2006.02.043. Epub 2006 Mar 31.
4
Burns sustained in combat explosions in Operations Iraqi and Enduring Freedom (OIF/OEF explosion burns).在伊拉克自由行动和持久自由行动(OIF/OEF)的战斗爆炸中遭受的烧伤(OIF/OEF爆炸烧伤)
Burns. 2006 Nov;32(7):853-7. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2006.03.008. Epub 2006 Aug 8.
5
Joint Theater Trauma System implementation of burn resuscitation guidelines improves outcomes in severely burned military casualties.联合战区创伤系统实施烧伤复苏指南可改善重度烧伤军事伤员的治疗效果。
J Trauma. 2008 Feb;64(2 Suppl):S146-51; discussion S151-2. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318160b44c.
6
Epidemiology of U.K. Military Burns 2008-2013.2008 - 2013年英国军队烧伤流行病学
J Burn Care Res. 2017 Jan/Feb;38(1):e269-e276. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000370.
7
Comparison of military and civilian burn patients admitted to a single center during 12 years of war.12年战争期间收治于单一中心的军队烧伤患者与平民烧伤患者的比较。
Burns. 2019 Feb;45(1):199-204. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.08.026. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
8
Burns to the genitalia, perineum, and buttocks increase the risk of death among U.S. service members sustaining combat-related burns in Iraq and Afghanistan.美国军人在伊拉克和阿富汗遭受与战斗相关的烧伤时,生殖器、会阴和臀部烧伤会增加死亡风险。
Burns. 2017 Aug;43(5):1120-1128. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.01.018. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
9
Comparison between civilian burns and combat burns from Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom.伊拉克自由行动和持久自由行动中平民烧伤与战斗烧伤的比较。
Ann Surg. 2006 Jun;243(6):786-92; discussion 792-5. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000219645.88867.b7.
10
Association of AKI with adverse outcomes in burned military casualties.烧伤军人的急性肾损伤与不良预后的相关性。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012 Feb;7(2):199-206. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04420511. Epub 2011 Dec 8.